| Literature DB >> 31109234 |
Angelika Edyta Charkiewicz1, Wioleta Justyna Omeljaniuk2, Karolina Orywal3, Małgorzata Czygier3, Maciej Szmitkowski3, Barbara Mroczko4,5, Dominik Maślach1, Andrzej Szpak6,7.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to show that some elements have a proven antioxidative effect and are essential for the proper development and functioning of the human body. The study also assessed the concentration of selected elements and total antioxidant status (TAS) in a group of male inhabitants of Białystok, Poland, who are professionally active in the metal industry. The study group comprised 163 men aged 55-64 years. The concentration of the analyzed elements was determined using flame (Zn and Cu) and electrothermal (Se, Cd, and Pb) atomic absorption spectrometry. Spectrophotometric test kits were used to assay the TAS and glutathione reductase (GR) activity in serum. The results suggested the mean concentration of Se in serum was 54.04 ± 12.10 μg/L, which was below the reference range. A significant negative correlation was observed between the concentration of Se in the serum and Pb and Cd concentrations in the whole blood of the studied men. The concentrations of the other elements, antioxidant potential, and GR activity were within the reference range. A statistically significant positive correlation was observed between Pb and Cd, indicating combined exposure and a considerable negative correlation between lead and selenium as well as between lead and TAS. Selenium and TAS are likely to modify the adverse effects of Pb in the bodies of the studied men. The results indicate that it is necessary to constantly monitor men who are occupationally exposed to heavy metals, maintain a healthy lifestyle, and introduce effective preventive measures at a local level.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant elements; antioxidant potential; heavy metals; metal industry
Year: 2019 PMID: 31109234 PMCID: PMC6537257 DOI: 10.1177/1557988319851954
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Mens Health ISSN: 1557-9883
The Average Concentrations of the Analyzed Elements and the Antioxidant Potential in the Blood of the Men Working in the Metal Industry (n = 163).
| Evaluated parameter | Reference range[ | X ± | Me | Min–Max |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A) Zn | 0.6–1.2 | 1.109 | 1.062 | 0.728–1.770 |
|
| B) Cu | 0.8–1.2 | 1.000 | 0.980 | 0.680–1.480 |
|
| C) Se | 70–140 | 54.04 | 53.18 | 28.44–98.78 | |
| D) TAS (mmol/L) | 1.30–1.77 | 1.742 | 1.740 | 1.270–2.420 | |
| E) GR | 33–73 | 60.97 ± 12.33 | 59.12 | 40.37–151.7 |
|
| F) Pb | to 270 | 29.39 ± 17.05 | 26.17 | 3.13–107.33 | |
| G) Cd | to 2.7 | 0.58 ± 0.46 | 0.52 | 0.02–2.53 |
Note. X = mean; SD = standard deviation; Me = median; Min = minimum; Max = maximum.
Neumeister & Böhm, 2015. bPearson linear correlation coefficient.
The Reference Ranges of the Zn, Cu, Se, Pb, Cd, TAS, and GR Activity, and the Number of Subjects Classified as Above, Below, or Within the Reference Range (n = 163).
| Evaluated parameter | Reference range[ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A) | 0.6–1.2 | 0 | 117 | 46 |
| B) | 0.8–1.2 | 18 | 126 | 19 |
| C) | 70–140 | 149 | 14 | 0 |
| D) | 1.30–1.77 | 1 | 94 | 68 |
| E) | 33–73 | 0 | 145 | 18 |
| F) | to 270 | 163 | 0 | 0 |
| G) | to 2.7 | 29 | 132 | 2 |
Note. GR = glutathione reductase; TAS = total antioxidant status.
Neumeister & Böhm, 2015.
Multiple Regression Analysis of the Effects of Food Consumption Frequency on the Concentrations in Serum and Blood of Selected Elements and Antioxidant Potential in the Studied Group.
| Food products | β factor | Significance | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
|
| 0.182 (0.08) |
| 0.14 |
|
| 0.173 (0.08) |
| |
|
| 0.151 (0.08) |
| |
|
| −0.295 (0.09) |
| |
| Fish | 0.108 (0.08) | .181 | |
| Sausages | 0.107 (0.075) | .155 | |
| Offal | 0.090 (0.07) | .244 | |
| Heated lard | 0.172 (0.08) | .051 | |
| Pastries | 0.112 (0.70) | .147 | |
| Meat preserves | 0.165 (0.12) | .164 | |
|
| |||
|
| 0.182 (0.08) |
| 0.11 |
|
| 0.172 (0.07) |
| |
|
| −0.159 (0.07) |
| |
| Flour-based meals | 0.148 (0.70) | .056 | |
| Meat | 0.137 (0.70) | .072 | |
| Bacon | −0.122 (0.80) | .164 | |
| Meat preserves | 0.089 (0.70) | .264 | |
| Sweet drinks | 0.080 (0.70) | .303 | |
|
| |||
|
| −0.230 (0.08) |
| 0.13 |
|
| −0.209 (0.08) |
| |
| Fresh vegetables | 0.109 (0.08) | .152 | |
| Products from pulses | 0.086 (0.08) | .268 | |
| Pastries | −0.140 (0.08) | .074 | |
| Lard | −0.136 (0.08) | .085 | |
| Bacon | −0.094 (0.08) | .233 | |
|
| |||
|
| 0.205 (0.08) |
| 0.11 |
|
| 0.216 (0.09) |
| |
|
| −0.198 (0.08) |
| |
| Fish | 0.077 (0.09) | .430 | |
| Fresh vegetables | 0.098 (0.08) | .234 | |
| Boiled vegetables | 0.076 (0.09) | .377 | |
| Wholemeal bread | 0.032 (0.09) | .737 | |
| Cereal and rice | 0.042 (0.09) | .658 | |
| Bacon | −0.134 (0.09) | .161 | |
| Fish preserves | −0.144 (0.09) | .111 | |
| Lard | −0.033 (0.10) | .741 | |
| Sweet drinks | −0.134 (0.08) | .105 | |
|
| |||
|
| 0.243 (0.08) |
| 0.09 |
|
| 0.179 (0.08) |
| |
|
| −0.224 (0.08) |
| |
| Wholemeal bread | 0.194 (0.09) | .841 | |
| Poultry | 0.005 (0.09) | .953 | |
| Fish | 0.070 (0.09) | .480 | |
| Butter | 0.160 (0.09) | .097 | |
| Fresh vegetables | 0.004 (0.80) | .952 | |
| Sweet bread | −0.177 (0.09) | .062 | |
| Meat preserves | −0.176 (0.11) | .106 | |
| Lard | 0.044 (0.10) | .664 | |
|
| |||
|
| 0.248 (0.09) |
| 0.03 |
|
| 0.207 (0.08) |
| |
|
| −0.221 (0.09) |
| |
| Wholemeal bread | 0.166 (0.09) | .098 | |
| Meat | 0.147 (0.09) | .100 | |
| Fruit | −0.058 (0.09) | .513 | |
| Fresh vegetables | −0.020 (0.09) | .811 | |
| Sugar | −0.022 (0.10) | .824 | |
|
| |||
|
| 0.234 (0.09) |
| 0.19 |
|
| 0.188 (0.08) |
| |
|
| −0.117 (0.09) |
| |
| Wholemeal bread | 0.063 (0.11) | .553 | |
| Products from pulses | 0.059 (0.09) | .530 | |
| Meat preserves | 0.030 (0.11) | .802 | |
| Butter | −0.019 (0.10) | .858 | |
| Fruit | −0.042 (0.09) | .656 | |
| Fresh vegetables | −0.143 (0.09) | .117 | |
Note. GR = glutathione reductase; TAS = total antioxidant status; β factor = standard error; p = significance level; R2 = multiple regression.
Correlation Between Some Elements From Dietary Intake and Concentration of Zn, Cu, Se, TAS, GR Activity in Serum, and of Pb and Cd in Blood in the Studied Group (n = 163).
| Evaluated parameter | Zn[ | Cu[ | Se[ | TAS[ | GR[ | Pb[ | Cd[ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −0.021 | −0.042 | −0.020 | −0.150 | 0.035 | 0.077 | −0.074 | |
| −0.040 | −0.091 | 0.047 | −0.121 | −0.012 | 0.019 | −0.112 | |
| −0.079 | −0.061 | 0.055 | 0.015 | 0.043 | −0.018 | −0.071 | |
| −0.079 | −0.030 | 0.051 | −0.004 | −0.100 | −0.040 | −0.075 | |
| −0.114 | −0.055 | 0.026 | −0.082 | −0.001 | 0.102 | −0.073 | |
| −0.027 | 0.060 | −0.050 | 0.080 | −0.004 | −0.023 | 0.062 | |
| −0.046 | −0.104 | 0.061 | −0.136 | −0.072 | 0.080 | −0.052 | |
| −0.065 | −0.015 | 0.061 | −0.007 | 0.017 | −0.067 | −0.096 | |
| 0.152 | −0.147 | 0.012 | −0.016 | −0.048 | −0.073 | −0.037 | |
| −0.002 | −0.050 | 0.066 |
| −0.027 | 0.041 | −0.092 | |
| −0.085 | −0.080 | 0.016 | −0.007 | 0.045 | 0.013 | −0.028 | |
| 0.003 | 0.042 | 0.117 | 0.061 | 0.001 | −0.087 | −0.127 | |
| −0.032 | −0.108 | 0.068 | 0.078 |
|
| −0.079 | |
| 0.012 | −0.035 | 0.005 | −0.076 | 0.025 | −0.067 | −0.034 | |
| −0.110 | −0.031 | −0.021 | −0.008 | 0.018 | −0.043 | 0.005 | |
| −0.084 | 0.069 | 0.048 |
| 0.053 | −0.032 | −0.010 | |
| −0.051 | −0.008 | 0.049 | 0.040 | 0.013 | −0.040 | −0.034 | |
| −0.060 | −0.018 | −0.064 | −0.038 | 0.046 | 0.002 | −0.044 | |
| −0.069 | −0.030 | 0.200 p < .011 | −0.056 | −0.030 | 0.053 | −0.087 | |
| −0.019 | 0.016 |
| 0.019 | −0.039 | −0.030 | −0.084 |
Note. p = significance level (Pearson linear correlation coefficient).
Concentration in blood serum. bConcentration in whole blood.