Oriol Sibila1,2, Elena Laserna3, Amelia Shoemark4, Holly R Keir4, Simon Finch4, Ana Rodrigo-Troyano1,2, Lidia Perea2, Mike Lonergan4, Pieter C Goeminne5,6, James D Chalmers4. 1. 1 Respiratory Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain. 2. 2 Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain. 3. 3 Hospital Comarcal de Mollet, Mollet del Vallés, Spain. 4. 4 Scottish Centre for Respiratory Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom. 5. 5 Department of Respiratory Medicine, AZ Nikolaas, Sint-Niklaas, Belgium; and. 6. 6 Department of Respiratory Medicine, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Abstract
Rationale: The principal underlying inhaled antibiotic treatment in bronchiectasis is that airway bacterial load drives inflammation, and therefore antibiotic treatment will reduce symptoms. Objectives: To determine the relationship between bacterial load and clinical outcomes, assess the stability of bacterial load over time, and test the hypothesis that response to inhaled antibiotics would be predicted by baseline bacterial load. Methods: We performed three studies. Studies 1 and 2 were prospective studies including adults with bronchiectasis. Study 3 was a post hoc analysis of a randomized trial of inhaled aztreonam. A priori patients were divided into low (<105 cfu/g), moderate (105-106 cfu/g), and high bacterial load (≥107 cfu/g) using quantitative sputum culture. Measurements and Main Results: Bacterial load was a stable trait associated with worse quality of life and more airway inflammation in studies 1, 2, and 3. In study 3, patients with high bacterial load showed an improvement in the primary endpoint (Quality of Life-Bronchiectasis-Respiratory Symptoms Score at Week 4) in favor of aztreonam (mean difference of 9.7 points; 95% confidence interval, 3.4-16.0; P = 0.003). The proportion of patients who achieved an increase above the minimum clinically important difference was higher in the aztreonam group at Week 4 (63% vs. 37%; P = 0.01) and at Week 12 (62% vs. 38%; P = 0.01) only in high bacterial load patients. Conclusions: Improvement of quality of life with inhaled aztreonam was only evident in patients with high bacterial load. Bacterial load may be a useful biomarker of severity of disease and treatment response.
RCT Entities:
Rationale: The principal underlying inhaled antibiotic treatment in bronchiectasis is that airway bacterial load drives inflammation, and therefore antibiotic treatment will reduce symptoms. Objectives: To determine the relationship between bacterial load and clinical outcomes, assess the stability of bacterial load over time, and test the hypothesis that response to inhaled antibiotics would be predicted by baseline bacterial load. Methods: We performed three studies. Studies 1 and 2 were prospective studies including adults with bronchiectasis. Study 3 was a post hoc analysis of a randomized trial of inhaled aztreonam. A priori patients were divided into low (<105 cfu/g), moderate (105-106 cfu/g), and high bacterial load (≥107 cfu/g) using quantitative sputum culture. Measurements and Main Results: Bacterial load was a stable trait associated with worse quality of life and more airway inflammation in studies 1, 2, and 3. In study 3, patients with high bacterial load showed an improvement in the primary endpoint (Quality of Life-Bronchiectasis-Respiratory Symptoms Score at Week 4) in favor of aztreonam (mean difference of 9.7 points; 95% confidence interval, 3.4-16.0; P = 0.003). The proportion of patients who achieved an increase above the minimum clinically important difference was higher in the aztreonam group at Week 4 (63% vs. 37%; P = 0.01) and at Week 12 (62% vs. 38%; P = 0.01) only in high bacterial load patients. Conclusions: Improvement of quality of life with inhaled aztreonam was only evident in patients with high bacterial load. Bacterial load may be a useful biomarker of severity of disease and treatment response.
Entities:
Keywords:
QoL-B; airway inflammation; inhaled aztreonam; quality of life
Authors: Micheál Mac Aogáin; Jayanth Kumar Narayana; Pei Yee Tiew; Nur A'tikah Binte Mohamed Ali; Valerie Fei Lee Yong; Tavleen Kaur Jaggi; Albert Yick Hou Lim; Holly R Keir; Alison J Dicker; Kai Xian Thng; Akina Tsang; Fransiskus Xaverius Ivan; Mau Ern Poh; Martina Oriano; Stefano Aliberti; Francesco Blasi; Teck Boon Low; Thun How Ong; Brian Oliver; Yan Hui Giam; Augustine Tee; Mariko Siyue Koh; John Arputhan Abisheganaden; Krasimira Tsaneva-Atanasova; James D Chalmers; Sanjay H Chotirmall Journal: Nat Med Date: 2021-04-05 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Sally Spencer; Tim Donovan; James D Chalmers; Alexander G Mathioudakis; Melissa J McDonnell; Anthony Tsang; Peter Leadbetter Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2022-01-05
Authors: Robert P Dickson; Marcus J Schultz; Tom van der Poll; Laura R Schouten; Nicole R Falkowski; Jenna E Luth; Michael W Sjoding; Christopher A Brown; Rishi Chanderraj; Gary B Huffnagle; Lieuwe D J Bos Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2020-03-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Michael P Combs; David S Wheeler; Jenna E Luth; Nicole R Falkowski; Natalie M Walker; John R Erb-Downward; Vibha N Lama; Robert P Dickson Journal: Lancet Respir Med Date: 2021-01-15 Impact factor: 30.700
Authors: Rachele Invernizzi; Joseph Barnett; Bhavin Rawal; Arjun Nair; Poonam Ghai; Shaun Kingston; Felix Chua; Zhe Wu; Athol U Wells; Elizabeth R Renzoni; Andrew G Nicholson; Alexandra Rice; Clare M Lloyd; Adam J Byrne; Toby M Maher; Anand Devaraj; Philip L Molyneaux Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2020-04-03 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Micheál Mac Aogáin; Kenny J X Lau; Zhao Cai; Jayanth Kumar Narayana; Rikky W Purbojati; Daniela I Drautz-Moses; Nicolas E Gaultier; Tavleen K Jaggi; Pei Yee Tiew; Thun How Ong; Mariko Siyue Koh; Albert Lim Yick Hou; John A Abisheganaden; Krasimira Tsaneva-Atanasova; Stephan C Schuster; Sanjay H Chotirmall Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Martina Oriano; Francesco Amati; Andrea Gramegna; Anthony De Soyza; Marco Mantero; Oriol Sibila; Sanjay H Chotirmall; Antonio Voza; Paola Marchisio; Francesco Blasi; Stefano Aliberti Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 5.923