| Literature DB >> 31109122 |
Mohammad Alibakhshikenari1, Bal Singh Virdee2, Chan H See3,4, Raed A Abd-Alhameed5, Francisco Falcone6, Ernesto Limiti7.
Abstract
A feasibility study of a novel configuration for a super-wide impedance planar antenna is presented based on a 2 × 2 microstrip patch antenna (MPA) using CST Microwave Studio. The antenna comprises a symmetrical arrangement of four-square patches that are interconnected to each other with cross-shaped high impedance microstrip lines. The antenna array is excited through a single feedline connected to one of the patches. The proposed antenna array configuration overcomes the main drawback of conventional MPA with a narrow bandwidth that is typically <5%. The antenna exhibits a super-wide frequency bandwidth from 20 GHz to 120 GHz for S11 < -15 dB, which corresponds to a fractional bandwidth of 142.85%. The antenna's performance of bandwidth, impedance match, and radiation gain were enhanced by etching slots on the patches. With the inclusion of the slot, the maximum radiation gain and efficiency of the MPA increased to 15.11 dBi and 85.79% at 80 GHz, which showed an improvement of 2.58 dBi and 12.54%, respectively. The dimension of each patch antenna was 4.3 × 5.3 mm2. The results showed that the proposed MPA is useful for various existing and emerging communication systems such as ultra-wideband (UWB) communications, RFID systems, massive multiple-output multiple-input (MIMO) for 5G, and radar systems.Entities:
Keywords: array antenna; microstrip patch antenna (MPA); millimeter-wave band; multiple-output multiple-input (MIMO); radar; radio frequency identification (RFID) systems; simplified composite right/left-handed metamaterial (SCRLH MTM); slot antenna
Year: 2019 PMID: 31109122 PMCID: PMC6566751 DOI: 10.3390/s19102306
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1The proposed microstrip antenna array.
Antenna structural parameters.
| L1 | 14.7 mm | W1 | 17.5 mm |
| L2 | 4.3 mm | W2 | 5.3 mm |
| L3 | 4.5 mm (λ0/4) | W3 | 0.3 mm (50 Ω) |
| L4 | 4.3 mm (0.52 × L2) | W4 | 0.52 mm (0.1 × W2) |
| L5 | 2.4 mm (λ0/4) | W5 | 0.3 mm (50 Ω) |
| L6 | 2.4 mm (λ0/4) | W6 | 0.32 mm (0.6 × W2) |
Figure 2Reflection-coefficient (S11 < −10 dB) response of the microstrip antenna array “without” slots and “with” slots using two different commercially available 3D full wave electromagnetics simulation tools (CST Microwave Studio® and HFSS™).
Figure 3Configuration of the proposed microstrip antenna array with a ground-plane.
Figure 4Gain response for both cases “with no” slots and “with” slots using two different commercially available 3D full wave electromagnetics simulation tools (CST Microwave Studio® and HFSS™).
Figure 5Radiation efficiency response for both cases “before applying” the slots and “after applying” the slots using two different commercially available 3D full wave electromagnetics simulation tools (CST Microwave Studio® and HFSS™).
Radiation performance parameters.
|
| ||
| Minimum | Maximum | Average |
| 5.75 dBi | 12.53 dBi | 8 dBi |
|
| ||
| 7.88 dBi | 15.11 dBi | 12 dBi |
|
| ||
| 2.13 dBi | 2.58 dBi | 4 dBi |
|
| ||
| Minimum | Maximum | Average |
| 60.82% | 73.25% | 66% |
|
| ||
| 67.41% | 85.79% | 78% |
|
| ||
| 6.95% | 12.54% | 12% |
Figure 6Co- and cross-radiation patterns of the proposed microstrip antenna arrays “with” slots in the E- and H-planes at spot frequencies over its operating band.
Figure 7Surface current distributions at the spot frequency of 80 GHz, (a) “without” slots, and (b) “with” slots.
Comparison with recently reported antennas.
| Refs. | Technique | Antenna Size (mm3) | Dielectric Constant | Operating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | CPW-fed antenna | 24 × 30.5 × 1.5 | 3.38 | 3.1–10.6 |
| [ | Inverted L-resonator & circular slotted GND | 40 × 30 × 1.2 | 4.4 | 3.1–10.6 |
| [ | Annular slot | 26 × 24 × 1.6 | 4.6 | 3–10.6 |
| [ | Rectangular slots | 16 × 14 × 1 | 4.4 | 3.2–10 |
| [ | Circular slots | 30 × 26 × 1.6 | 4.4 | 2.5–11 |
| [ | Inverted U-strip | 45 × 50 × 1.27 | 6.0 | 3.1–10.6 |
| [ | Split ring resonators | 30 × 26 × 1.6 | 3.5 | 2.4–10.1 |
| [ | lamp shaped antenna | 28×15× 1.6 | 4.4 | 2.7–14 |
| [ | Cap. Integrated antenna | 30.5 × 24 × 1.5 | 3.3 | 3.1–10.6 |
| [ | L-shaped stub | 46 × 42 × 1 | 4.4 | 3.1–10.6 |
| [ | Loading quarter wavelength resonating strip | 38 × 30 × 1.6 | 4.4 | 3.1–10.6 |
| [ | Loading TL-MTM within UWB antenna | 38.5 × 46.4 × 1.6 | 4.4 | 3.1–10.6 |
| [ | Half elliptical ring with a U-shaped slot | 32 × 32.6 × 1.6 | 4.4 | 3.1–10.6 |
| [ | Loading quarter wavelength resonating strip at the center of the patch | 50 × 24 × 1.6 | 4.4 | 3.1–11.4 |
| [ | Loading parasitic strip | 46 × 20 × 1.0 | 2.4 | 3.1–10.6 |
| [ | Loading quarter wavelength resonating strip at the center of the patch | 42 × 24 × 1.6 | 4.4 | 3.1–12.0 |
| [ | Loading strip-line to the patch | 45 × 32 × 1.0 | 4.4 | 3.1–10.6 |
| [ | Capacitors loaded miniaturized resonator in | 30 × 31 × 1.5 | 3.38 | 3.1–10.6 |
| [ | Band-pass filter integration with combination of GCPW, grounded reflector, and CPW feed line | 35 × 24.4 × 2 | 3.38 | 2.8–6 |
| [ | Dielectric loading | 61 × 61 × 8 | ~4.0 | 1.6–12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|