| Literature DB >> 31109048 |
Yuxin Cai1, Linwen Yu2,3,4, Yong Yang5, Yang Gao6, Changhui Yang7,8.
Abstract
Drying shrinkage of alkali-activated slag concrete (AASC) is significantly greater than that of concrete made with ordinary Portland cement (OPC). It limits the large-scale application of AASC in field engineering. This study investigates the effect of early age-curing methods, including water curing, curing in elevated-temperature water, and CO2 curing, on drying shrinkage of AASC. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetric (TG-DTG), and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) were carried out to analyze the composition and microstructure of hydration products, to provide deeper understanding of drying shrinkage of AASC. The results show that water curing decreased drying shrinkage of both C30 and C50 AASC moderately compared to air curing, while it was more effective for C30 AASC. Curing in water of elevated temperature and CO2 curing were very beneficial to mitigate drying shrinkage of AASC. Heat curing decreased drying shrinkage of AASC up to 80%. SEM and TG-DTG results show that denser microstructure formed because of the accelerated hydration, resulting in lower porosity and lower proportion of pores smaller than 25 nm that contributed to the reduction of drying shrinkage. In addition, under high-temperature curing, most autogenous shrinkage of AASC occurred in the first few days because hydration was accelerated. After measurement of drying shrinkage was started, recorded autogenous shrinkage of AASC cured in elevated-temperature water should be much less than that of AASC cured at normal temperature. It is another important reason for the reduction of drying shrinkage. Carbonation occurring in the CO2 curing period led to the decalcification of C-(A)-S-H gel; it coarsened the pore-size distribution and decreased the total porosity. Therefore, drying shrinkage of C30 and C50 AASC was declined by 49% and 53% respectively.Entities:
Keywords: alkali-activated slag concrete (AASC); curing; drying shrinkage; pore structure
Year: 2019 PMID: 31109048 PMCID: PMC6566924 DOI: 10.3390/ma12101633
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Chemical compositions of GGBFS (wt.%).
| SiO2 | Fe2O3 | Al2O3 | TiO2 | CaO | MgO | MnO | SO3 | K2O | Na2O | Loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32.70 | 0.50 | 14.03 | 2.13 | 39.00 | 8.99 | 0.40 | 0.20 | 0.41 | 0.25 | 0.78 |
Physical properties and chemical compositions of water glass.
| W(SiO2) (%) | W(Na2O) (%) | W(water) (%) | Baume Degree (°Bé) | Density (g/cm3) | Modulus |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28.13 | 11.09 | 49.72 | 44 | 1.452 | 2.62 |
The basic performance of manufactured sand.
| Apparent Density (kg/m3) | Bulk Density (kg/m3) | Void Ratio (%) | Powder Content (%) | Fineness Modulus | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loose | Tight | Loose | Tight | |||
| 2680 | 1300 | 1540 | 51.0 | 43.0 | 5.8 | 2.9 |
Chemical compositions of crushed limestone (wt.%).
| SiO2 | CaO | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | SO3 | MgO | Na2O | Loss on Ignition |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.50 | 54.03 | 0.60 | 0.36 | 0.01 | 0.54 | 0.08 | 36.60 |
The basic performance of crushed limestone.
| Particle Sizes (mm) | Apparent Density (kg/m3) | Bulk Density (kg/m3) | Void Ratio (%) | Clay Content (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loose | Tight | Loose | Tight | |||
| 5-10 | 2670 | 1380 | 1470 | 48.3 | 44.9 | 0.7 |
| 10-20 | 2670 | 1400 | 1520 | 47.6 | 43.1 | 0.5 |
Figure 1Particles size distribution of sand and crushed limestone.
Mixture proportion of AASC (kg/m3).
| Group | w/b | Slag | Sand | Gravel | Water | Water Glass | NaOH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C30 | 0.50 | 400.0 | 734.8 | 1102.2 | 148.6 | 103.4 | 11.0 |
| C50 | 0.42 | 400.0 | 785.0 | 1084.0 | 116.6 | 103.4 | 11.0 |
The early age-curing methods.
| Group | Temperature (°C) | RH (%) | Time (h) | Curing Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 | 100 | 48 | Water curing |
| 2 | 40 | 100 | 48 | Water curing |
| 3 | 60 | 100 | 48 | Water curing |
| 4 | 20 | 80 | 48 | Air curing |
| 5 | 20 | 60 | 48 | Air curing |
| 6 | 20 | 80 | 48 | CO2 curing |
| 7 | 20 | 60 | 48 | CO2 curing |
Figure 2Effect of early age curing on compressive strength of AASC.
Figure 3Effect of early age curing on drying shrinkage of AASC.
Figure 4Effect of early age curing on moisture loss of AASC.
Figure 5XRD analysis of AAS pastes.
Figure 6TG-DTG analysis of AAS pastes.
Figure 7SEM images of AAS pastes: (a) 20 °C water; (b) 60 °C water; (c) air, 20 °C/60%RH; (d) CO2, 20 °C/60%RH.
Figure 8Effect of early curing on pore structure of AAS pastes.
Effect of early age curing on pore structure of AAS pastes.
| Group | Total Porosity (%) | Average Pore Diameter (nm) | Median Pore Diameter (nm) | Pore-Size Distribution (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <25 nm | 25–5000 nm | >5000 nm | ||||
| 1 | 23.01 | 7.2 | 7.0 | 88.68 | 5.30 | 6.02 |
| 3 | 18.63 | 6.1 | 5.2 | 85.72 | 10.69 | 3.59 |
| 5 | 28.78 | 7.3 | 7.2 | 92.10 | 3.34 | 4.56 |
| 7 | 21.31 | 12.2 | 14.3 | 73.42 | 18.95 | 7.63 |
Figure 9Correlation between drying shrinkage rate and moisture loss of AASC.
Correlation analysis results between drying shrinkage rate and moisture loss of AASC.
| Group | C30-1 | C30-3 | C30-5 | C30-7 | C50-1 | C50-3 | C50-5 | C50-7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slope | 563.35660 ± 30.33916 | 132.56786 ± 4.36318 | 929.33223 ± 20.83994 | 536.21887 ± 15.43849 | 585.73686 ± 35.86805 | 90.89841 ± 5.61508 | 1075.27965 ± 53.27048 | 835.91454 ± 22.87730 |
| R2 | 0.98290 | 0.99354 | 0.99699 | 0.99505 | 0.97800 | 0.97762 | 0.98549 | 0.99553 |