| Literature DB >> 31108967 |
Shiyong Sun1, Hui Sun2,3, Deshun Zhang4, Jianfeng Zhang5, Zeyu Cai6, Guanghua Qin7, Yumin Song8.
Abstract
Vegetation restoration is an available way to ameliorate degraded lands. In order to study the response of soil microbes to vegetation restoration in coal mining subsidence areas, the composition and distribution of soil microbes were discussed through three plots: unsubsided area (CA), new subsided area (NSA), and old subsided area (OSA) with different vegetation restoration time in Huabei coal mine. Meanwhile, changes in soil catalase and urease activity were explored and the correlation between soil bacteria, fungi, and environmental factors was analysed. The results demonstrated that Nitrospira was the dominant bacteria in all areas sampled. Microorganisms in the 0-20 cm and 40-60 cm soil layers of OSA had the highest Simpson index, whereas the index in NSA was lowest (at all soil depths). The catalase activity in NSA was significantly higher than that in CA, and there was no significant difference in catalase activity with soil depth, while the urease activity declined gradually with increasing soil depth. The urease activity in the 20-60 cm soil layer of NSA and OSA was significantly higher than that of CA. Furthermore, the distribution of bacteria was mainly affected by soil organic matter, available potassium, available phosphorus, and alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen, whereas pH and catalase activity mainly affected fungal distribution. These results implied that soil catalase activity in NSA and urease activity in the 20-40 cm soil layer of NSA and OSA were significantly enhanced after vegetation restoration, and that long-term plant restoration could improve soil fertility and soil microbial community diversity in coal mining areas.Entities:
Keywords: coal mine; soil enzyme activity; soil microbes; subsidence area; vegetation restoration
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31108967 PMCID: PMC6572236 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16101757
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
The main vegetation species and basic overview of different sample plots in the study area.
| Sample plots | Altitude (m) | Vegetation Restoration Time (years) | Canopy Density | Main Tree Species | Tree Height (m) | DBH (cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA① | 36 | 10 | 0.5 | 3–5 | 4–6 | |
| NSA② | 32 | 5 | 0.7 | 5–8 | 6–10 | |
| OSA③ | 30 | 20 | 0.8 | 8–15 | 16–24 |
Note: ① CA: Control Area. ② NSA: New Subsidence Area. ③ OSA: Old Subsidence Area. DBH: Diameter at breast height.
Soil properties at different depths and different sample plots.
| Sample Plots | Depth (cm) | pH | SOM | TN | AN | AP | AK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA1 | 0–20 | 8.18 ± 0.11aA | 11.08 ± 5.55aA | 0.42 ± 0.01aC | 62.71 ± 5.22aA | 5.76 ± 0.23aB | 186.58 ± 1.65aB |
| CA2 | 20–40 | 8.22 ± 0.04aB | 9.23 ± 3.31aA | 0.22 ± 0.01bC | 17.10 ± 0.00cB | 0.34 ± 0.30bC | 50.61 ± 0.38cC |
| CA3 | 40–60 | 8.19 ± 0.02aC | 7.02 ± 1.47aA | 0.20 ± 0.00cC | 26.22 ± 3.95bB | 0.40 ± 0.20bB | 54.21 ± 0.77bC |
| NSA1 | 0–20 | 8.30 ± 0.04abA | 15.33 ± 2.42aA | 0.62 ± 0.01aB | 71.83 ± 12.33aA | 8.18 ± 0.30bA | 192.55 ± 1.30aA |
| NSA2 | 20–40 | 8.25 ± 0.02bB | 9.78 ± 3.37bA | 0.45 ± 0.01cA | 33.06 ± 3.95bA | 4.45 ± 0.12cA | 127.11 ± 0.98cA |
| NSA3 | 40–60 | 8.35 ± 0.07aB | 7.19 ± 0.84bA | 0.51 ± 0.01bA | 30.78 ± 0.00bB | 13.80 ± 0.12aA | 150.86 ± 0.21bA |
| OSA1 | 0–20 | 8.30 ± 0.05cA | 9.60 ± 3.13aA | 0.87 ± 0.01aA | 68.41 ± 3.42aA | 1.97 ± 0.20aC | 119.83 ± 1.03aC |
| OSA2 | 20–40 | 8.38 ± 0.02bA | 6.65 ± 1.76aA | 0.33 ± 0.01bB | 34.21 ± 3.43cA | 0.93 ± 0.30bB | 68.52 ± 0.08bB |
| OSA3 | 40–60 | 8.48 ± 0.01aA | 8.31 ± 2.22aA | 0.27 ± 0.00cB | 41.19 ± 3.95bA | 0.47 ± 0.30bB | 63.79 ± 0.44cB |
Note: lowercase letters represent the significance of differences between soil layers within a sample plot; where the letters are different, there is a significant difference (p < 0.05). Uppercase letters represent the significance of differences between sample plots for the same soil layer; where the letters are different, there is a significant difference (p < 0.05).
Figure 1The main genera of bacteria.
Figure 2The main genera of fungi.
Figure 3Rank–abundance distribution curves. Note: (a) Rank–abundance distribution curves of bacteria, (b) Rank–abundance distribution curves of fungi.
Alpha diversity indices of bacteria and fungi in soils at different depths and different sample plots.
| Sample Plots | Chao1 | Shannon | Ace | Simpson | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacteria | Fungi | Bacteria | Fungi | Bacteria | Fungi | Bacteria | Fungi | |
| CA1 | 11,479.21 | 810.99 | 11.17 | 6.79 | 12,373.23 | 807.25 | 0.9983 | 0.9646 |
| CA2 | 12,022.88 | 546.42 | 11.23 | 6.35 | 12,858.34 | 563.21 | 0.9986 | 0.9666 |
| CA3 | 11,893.88 | 460.43 | 11.08 | 5.60 | 12,664.56 | 461.89 | 0.9981 | 0.9081 |
| NSA1 | 13,652.12 | 1006.68 | 10.36 | 6.61 | 15,137.37 | 1006.85 | 0.9938 | 0.9548 |
| NSA2 | 15,436.82 | 538.33 | 10.76 | 4.48 | 16,585.60 | 538.22 | 0.9967 | 0.7751 |
| NSA3 | 12,449.85 | 508.02 | 10.40 | 5.04 | 13,351.64 | 516.77 | 0.9949 | 0.8117 |
| OSA1 | 13,877.33 | 909.98 | 11.23 | 6.76 | 15,230.25 | 906.49 | 0.9986 | 0.9713 |
| OSA2 | 11,348.95 | 415.34 | 10.53 | 5.53 | 12,326.90 | 415.62 | 0.9967 | 0.9247 |
| OSA3 | 13,806.82 | 553.11 | 11.04 | 6.76 | 14,967.82 | 562.23 | 0.9981 | 0.9735 |
Figure 4Catalase activities and urease activities in soil layers of different sample plots. Note: lowercase letters represent the significance of differences between soil layers within a sample plot; where the letters are different, there is a significant difference (p < 0.05). Uppercase letters represent the significance of differences between sample plots for the same soil layer; where the letters are different, there is a significant difference (p < 0.05).
Figure 5Canonical correlation analysis (CCA) ordination of bacteria community with the environmental factors in the soils.
Figure 6CCA ordination of fungal community with the environmental factors in the soils.