Literature DB >> 31108762

Temporal sweetness and side tastes profiles of 16 sweeteners using temporal check-all-that-apply (TCATA).

Vicki Wei Kee Tan1, May Sui Mei Wee1, Oliver Tomic2, Ciaran G Forde3.   

Abstract

An increase in consumer awareness around the negative health impacts of consuming excess added sugars has led to a rise in the replacement of sucrose in foods and beverages. This replacement is often through the use of low or no calorie sweeteners to reduce total calories while maintaining sweetness and palatability. There are a wide variety of sweeteners with diverse physical and caloric compositions which can be used at concentrations estimated to be equi-sweet to sucrose in food products. However, many of the available sweeteners are known to differ in their temporal profiles and may have other side and aftertastes alongside sweetness that need to be considered when comparing their suitability as potential sucrose substitutes. The objective of the current study was to profile and compare the temporal sweetness and qualitative differences of 15 sweeteners to sucrose across nutritive saccharide (sucrose, dextrose, fructose, allulose (D-psicose), palatinose (isomaltulose), sucrose-allulose mixture), nutritive polyol (maltitol, erythritol, mannitol, xylitol, sorbitol) and non-nutritive (acesulfame-k, aspartame, sucralose, stevia (rebaudioside-A or rebA), luo han guo (monk fruit extract or mogroside)) groups, at equi-sweet intensity to 10% w/v sucrose based on a previous psychophysical dose-response study. Using the Temporal Check-all-that-Apply (TCATA) method, 20 participants evaluated a set of 17 sweetener samples (including a sucrose duplicate) in triplicates across three 1-h sessions for the occurrence of six attributes (sweetness, bitterness, metallic taste, chemical taste, honey taste and mouth-drying) over a 60 s period. Sucrose was characterised by a rapid sweetness onset (within first 10 s) to peak citation, and subsequent decay of sweetness with minimal side tastes noted. Acesulfame-K, stevia (rebA) and luo han guo had prominent and long-lasting citations of the undesirable bitter, metallic and chemical side tastes and significantly lower sweetness citations. Allulose, erythritol, sorbitol, aspartame and sucralose were perceived to have bitter, metallic and chemical side tastes, but retained a largely sweet taste profile, with longer residual sweetness for aspartame and sucralose. Nutritive sweeteners dextrose, fructose, maltitol, mannitol, sucrose-allulose mixture, palatinose and xylitol had the most similar temporal and qualitative taste profiles when compared to sucrose, in terms of their sweetness onset, peak sweetness citations, sweetness decay, and side taste profiles.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sucrose reduction; Sugar; Sweeteners; Temporal check-all-that-apply; Temporal profile; Time-intensity

Year:  2019        PMID: 31108762     DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.03.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Res Int        ISSN: 0963-9969            Impact factor:   6.475


  10 in total

Review 1.  Sugar reduction methods and their application in confections: a review.

Authors:  Elle McKenzie; Soo-Yeun Lee
Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 2.391

2.  Limited cheese intake reduces HPA axis and behavioral stress responses in male rats.

Authors:  Sarah Fourman; Dana Buesing; Sean Girvin; Houda Nashawi; Yvonne M Ulrich-Lai
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2021-10-01

3.  The Role of Non-Caloric Sweeteners in Sensory Characteristics of Pastry Products.

Authors:  Vilma Quitral; Juanita Valdés; Valeska Umaña; Nicol Gallardo; María José Alcaino; Carolina Araya; Marcos Flores
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2019-08-08

4.  Sweetness profiles of glycosylated rebaudioside A and its binary mixtures with allulose and maltitol.

Authors:  Jinsil Jung; SooHyun Kim; Sunghee Park; Jae-Hee Hong
Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 2.391

5.  Impact of lactisole on the time-intensity profile of selected sweeteners in dependence of the binding site.

Authors:  Corinna M Deck; Maik Behrens; Martin Wendelin; Jakob P Ley; Gerhard E Krammer; Barbara Lieder
Journal:  Food Chem X       Date:  2022-09-16

6.  Changes in temporal sensory profile, liking, satiety, and postconsumption attributes of yogurt with natural sweeteners.

Authors:  Diksha Chadha; Nazimah Hamid; Kevin Kantono; Manon Marsan
Journal:  J Food Sci       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.693

7.  Sensory Characterization and Acceptability of a New Lulo (Solanum quitoense Lam.) Powder-Based Soluble Beverage Using Rapid Evaluation Techniques with Consumers.

Authors:  María Remedios Marín-Arroyo; Sofía Marcela González-Bonilla
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-10-08

Review 8.  Effects of gastrointestinal delivery of non-caloric tastants on energy intake: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tim Klaassen; Daniel Keszthelyi; Freddy J Troost; Aalt Bast; Adrian A M Masclee
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 5.614

9.  Descriptive Sensory Profile and Consumer Study Impact of Different Nutritive and Non-Nutritive Sweeteners on the Descriptive, Temporal Profile, and Consumer Acceptance in a Peach Juice Matrix.

Authors:  Alessandra Medeiros; Elson Tavares; Helena Maria Andre Bolini
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-01-17

10.  Rare sugars: metabolic impacts and mechanisms of action: a scoping review.

Authors:  Alison Smith; Amanda Avery; Rebecca Ford; Qian Yang; Aurélie Goux; Indraneil Mukherjee; David C A Neville; Preeti Jethwa
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 4.125

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.