PROBLEM: Strategies assisting healthcare professionals to make evidence-based decisions are crucial for quality patient care and outcomes. To date, there is one systematic review (Albrecht et al., 2016) examining knowledge translation (KT) efforts in child health settings. This systematic review aims to provide an update on current evidence identifying KT interventions implementing research into child health settings. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Nine electronic databases were searched, restricted by date (2011-2018) and language (English). Eligibility included: 1) randomized controlled trials (RCT), controlled clinical trials (CCT), or controlled before-and-after (CBA) studies; 2) interventions implementing research into child health practice; and 3) outcomes were measured at the healthcare professional/process, patient, or economic level. SAMPLE: Health care professionals working in child health settings. RESULTS: 48 studies (38 RCT, 7 CBA, 3 CCT) were included. Studies employed single (n = 34) and multiple (n = 14) interventions. The methodological quality of studies was moderate (n = 18), strong (n = 16) and weak (n = 14). Studies showing significant, positive effects included (n = 9) RCTs, (n = 3) CBAs and (n = 2) CCTs. These studies employed (n = 11) single KT interventions and (n = 3) multiple KT interventions. Interventions included educational (n = 6), reminders (n = 3), computerized decision supports (n = 2), multidisciplinary teams (n = 2) and financial and educational interventions combined (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Effective KT strategies used by health care professionals in child health settings were found to be online education curriculums and computerized decision supports or reminders. IMPLICATIONS: This review update serves as an up-to-date 'state of the science' on KT strategies used in pediatric health professionals' clinical practice, assessed by the most rigorous research designs.
PROBLEM: Strategies assisting healthcare professionals to make evidence-based decisions are crucial for quality patient care and outcomes. To date, there is one systematic review (Albrecht et al., 2016) examining knowledge translation (KT) efforts in child health settings. This systematic review aims to provide an update on current evidence identifying KT interventions implementing research into child health settings. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Nine electronic databases were searched, restricted by date (2011-2018) and language (English). Eligibility included: 1) randomized controlled trials (RCT), controlled clinical trials (CCT), or controlled before-and-after (CBA) studies; 2) interventions implementing research into child health practice; and 3) outcomes were measured at the healthcare professional/process, patient, or economic level. SAMPLE: Health care professionals working in child health settings. RESULTS: 48 studies (38 RCT, 7 CBA, 3 CCT) were included. Studies employed single (n = 34) and multiple (n = 14) interventions. The methodological quality of studies was moderate (n = 18), strong (n = 16) and weak (n = 14). Studies showing significant, positive effects included (n = 9) RCTs, (n = 3) CBAs and (n = 2) CCTs. These studies employed (n = 11) single KT interventions and (n = 3) multiple KT interventions. Interventions included educational (n = 6), reminders (n = 3), computerized decision supports (n = 2), multidisciplinary teams (n = 2) and financial and educational interventions combined (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Effective KT strategies used by health care professionals in child health settings were found to be online education curriculums and computerized decision supports or reminders. IMPLICATIONS: This review update serves as an up-to-date 'state of the science' on KT strategies used in pediatric health professionals' clinical practice, assessed by the most rigorous research designs.
Authors: Claude Bernard Uwizeye; Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun; André Bussières; Aliki Thomas; Dahlia Kairy; José Massougbodji; Nathalie Rheault; Sébastien Tchoubi; Leonel Philibert; Serigne Abib Gaye; Lobna Khadraoui; Ali Ben Charif; Ella Diendéré; Léa Langlois; Michèle Dugas; France Légaré Journal: Interact J Med Res Date: 2022-07-11
Authors: Alison Brown; Courtney Barnes; Judith Byaruhanga; Matthew McLaughlin; Rebecca K Hodder; Debbie Booth; Nicole Nathan; Rachel Sutherland; Luke Wolfenden Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-07-31 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Libby Haskell; Emma J Tavender; Catherine L Wilson; Sharon O'Brien; Franz E Babl; Meredith L Borland; Elizabeth Cotterell; Nicolette Sheridan; Ed Oakley; Stuart R Dalziel Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2021-08-03 Impact factor: 2.655