Literature DB >> 31107299

Virologic Failure Among People Living With HIV Initiating Dolutegravir-Based Versus Other Recommended Regimens in Real-World Clinical Care Settings.

Robin M Nance1, Vani Vannappagari2, Kimberly Smith2, Catherine B Johannes3, Brian Calingaert4, Catherine W Saltus4, Kenneth H Mayer5, Bridget M Whitney1, Benigno Rodriguez6, Richard D Moore7, Joseph J Eron8, Elvin Geng9, William Christopher Mathews10, Michael J Mugavero11, Michael S Saag11, Mari M Kitahata12, Joseph A C Delaney1, Heidi M Crane12.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for initial antiretroviral treatment (ART) regimens have evolved, with integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) increasingly prominent. Research on virologic failure (VF) with INSTI therapy is predominantly from clinical trials not care settings, especially for recently approved medications including dolutegravir. We compared outcomes among people living with HIV (PLWH) who initiated recommended regimens in clinical care across the United States.
SETTING: We examined 2 groups of PLWH at 8 clinics who initiated ART regimens (August 1, 2013-March 31, 2017): those ART treatment-naive at initiation, and those treatment-experienced.
METHODS: The outcome in this longitudinal cohort study was VF, defined as a viral load of ≥400 copies/mL ≥6 months after ART initiation. We examined the proportion of individuals who remained on, switched, or discontinued the regimen. Associations between regimens and outcomes were examined with adjusted Cox proportional hazards models.
RESULTS: Among 5177 PLWH, a lower proportion experienced VF on dolutegravir- versus other INSTI- or darunavir-based regimens for previously treatment-naive (7% vs. 12% vs. 28%) and treatment-experienced PLWH (6% vs. 10% vs. 21%). In adjusted analyses, hazard ratios were similar across regimens for the combined outcome of regimen discontinuation or treatment switch. The hazard ratios for VF comparing dolutegravir- to darunavir-based regimens was 0.30 (95% CI: 0.2 to 0.6) among previously treatment-naive PLWH and was 0.60 (95% CI: 0.4 to 0.8) among treatment-experienced PLWH.
CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of previously treatment-naive PLWH remaining on recommended ART regimens did not differ by regimen. The likelihood of VF was lower with dolutegravir- than darunavir-based regimens for previously treatment-naive and treatment-experienced PLWH.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31107299      PMCID: PMC6649666          DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr        ISSN: 1525-4135            Impact factor:   3.731


  34 in total

1.  Correcting for noncompliance and dependent censoring in an AIDS Clinical Trial with inverse probability of censoring weighted (IPCW) log-rank tests.

Authors:  J M Robins; D M Finkelstein
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Once daily dolutegravir (S/GSK1349572) in combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV: planned interim 48 week results from SPRING-1, a dose-ranging, randomised, phase 2b trial.

Authors:  Jan van Lunzen; Franco Maggiolo; José R Arribas; Aza Rakhmanova; Patrick Yeni; Benjamin Young; Jürgen K Rockstroh; Steve Almond; Ivy Song; Cindy Brothers; Sherene Min
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 25.071

3.  Dolutegravir for treatment of HIV: SPRING forwards?

Authors:  Laura J Waters; Tristan J Barber
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Durable efficacy and safety of raltegravir versus efavirenz when combined with tenofovir/emtricitabine in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients: final 5-year results from STARTMRK.

Authors:  Jürgen K Rockstroh; Edwin DeJesus; Jeffrey L Lennox; Yazdan Yazdanpanah; Michael S Saag; Hong Wan; Anthony J Rodgers; Monica L Walker; Michael Miller; Mark J DiNubile; Bach-Yen Nguyen; Hedy Teppler; Randi Leavitt; Peter Sklar
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.731

5.  Activity of elvitegravir, a once-daily integrase inhibitor, against resistant HIV Type 1: results of a phase 2, randomized, controlled, dose-ranging clinical trial.

Authors:  Andrew R Zolopa; Daniel S Berger; Harry Lampiris; Lijie Zhong; Steven L Chuck; Jeffrey V Enejosa; Brian P Kearney; Andrew K Cheng
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Dolutegravir (S/GSK1349572) exhibits significantly slower dissociation than raltegravir and elvitegravir from wild-type and integrase inhibitor-resistant HIV-1 integrase-DNA complexes.

Authors:  Kendra E Hightower; Ruolan Wang; Felix Deanda; Brian A Johns; Kurt Weaver; Yingnian Shen; Ginger H Tomberlin; H Luke Carter; Timothy Broderick; Scott Sigethy; Takahiro Seki; Masanori Kobayashi; Mark R Underwood
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Efficacy of raltegravir versus efavirenz when combined with tenofovir/emtricitabine in treatment-naïve HIV-1-infected patients: week-192 overall and subgroup analyses from STARTMRK.

Authors:  Edwin DeJesus; Jürgen K Rockstroh; Jeffrey L Lennox; Michael S Saag; Adriano Lazzarin; Jing Zhao; Hong Wan; Anthony J Rodgers; Monica L Walker; Michael Miller; Mark J DiNubile; Bach-Yen Nguyen; Hedy Teppler; Randi Leavitt; Peter Sklar
Journal:  HIV Clin Trials       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug

8.  A randomized double-blind comparison of coformulated elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: analysis of week 96 results.

Authors:  Andrew Zolopa; Paul E Sax; Edwin DeJesus; Anthony Mills; Calvin Cohen; David Wohl; Joel E Gallant; Hui C Liu; Andrew Plummer; Kirsten L White; Andrew K Cheng; Martin S Rhee; Javier Szwarcberg
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.731

9.  Once-daily dolutegravir versus raltegravir in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV-1 infection: 48 week results from the randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority SPRING-2 study.

Authors:  Francois Raffi; Anita Rachlis; Hans-Jürgen Stellbrink; W David Hardy; Carlo Torti; Chloe Orkin; Mark Bloch; Daniel Podzamczer; Vadim Pokrovsky; Federico Pulido; Steve Almond; David Margolis; Clare Brennan; Sherene Min
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Cohort profile: the Centers for AIDS Research Network of Integrated Clinical Systems.

Authors:  Mari M Kitahata; Benigno Rodriguez; Richard Haubrich; Stephen Boswell; W Christopher Mathews; Michael M Lederman; William B Lober; Stephen E Van Rompaey; Heidi M Crane; Richard D Moore; Michael Bertram; James O Kahn; Michael S Saag
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 7.196

View more
  4 in total

1.  Virologic failure after 48 weeks of raltegravir-based regimen in low HIV-1 incidence setting.

Authors:  Wassim Chehadeh; Osama Albaksami; Shaikhah Al-Shammari
Journal:  Antivir Chem Chemother       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec

Review 2.  HIV-1 subtype C predicted co-receptor tropism in Africa: an individual sequence level meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nontokozo D Matume; Denis M Tebit; Pascal O Bessong
Journal:  AIDS Res Ther       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 2.250

3.  Virologic Outcomes Among People Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus With High Pretherapy Viral Load Burden Initiating on Common Core Agents.

Authors:  Anthony M Mills; Kathy L Schulman; Jennifer S Fusco; Michael B Wohlfeiler; Julie L Priest; Alan Oglesby; Laurence Brunet; Philip C Lackey; Gregory P Fusco
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 3.835

4.  Substantial decline in heavily treated therapy-experienced persons with HIV with limited antiretroviral treatment options.

Authors:  Kristina L Bajema; Robin M Nance; Joseph A C Delaney; Ellen Eaton; Thibaut Davy-Mendez; Maile Y Karris; Richard D Moore; Joseph J Eron; Benigno Rodriguez; Kenneth H Mayer; Elvin Geng; Cindy Garris; Michael S Saag; Heidi M Crane; Mari M Kitahata
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2020-11-15       Impact factor: 4.632

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.