Literature DB >> 31106977

Vertebroplasty for acute painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: An update.

Anthony Lamanna1, Julian Maingard2, Hong Kuan Kok3, Dinesh Ranatunga1, Seamus T Looby4,5, Paul Brennan4,5, Michelle Chua2, Andrew Owen1, Duncan Mark Brooks1,6, Ronil V Chandra2,7, Hamed Asadi1,2,6,7,8.   

Abstract

Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are a common cause of back pain and disability and are usually osteoporotic in nature. Therapy aims to adequately control pain and allow early mobilisation and return of function while preventing additional fractures. A proportion of patients do not achieve adequate pain relief using conservative measures alone. Unwanted adverse effects from medications may also ensue. Vertebroplasty represents an alternative treatment option for VCFs. Patients with acute VCFs (≤6 weeks old) may gain the most benefit from vertebroplasty as healed fractures are not as amenable to cement injection. High-quality studies have reported conflicting results regarding the use of vertebroplasty in the treatment of acute VCFs. Despite high-quality evidence, varying study designs and heterogenous patient cohorts make interpretation of this data difficult. Only one sham-controlled randomised controlled trial (RCT) has evaluated vertebroplasty exclusively in patients with acute VCFs, reporting favourable results. Pooled data from RCTs also suggest vertebroplasty to be safe. This article provides a concise and critical review of the current literature regarding vertebroplasty for the treatment of acute VCFs.
© 2019 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  osteoporosis; osteoporotic fractures; vertebral compression fractures; vertebral fractures; vertebroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31106977     DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12900

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1754-9477            Impact factor:   1.735


  5 in total

1.  Comparison Between Hyperextension and Neutral Positions for Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty: Which is Best for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures?

Authors:  Yan Ding; Shengjie Dong; Jingjie Wang; Jinpeng Cui; Zhilin Cao; Shiqiao Lv
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 2.  Advances in the application of mesenchymal stem cells, exosomes, biomimetic materials, and 3D printing in osteoporosis treatment.

Authors:  Xiao-Yu He; Hai-Ming Yu; Shu Lin; Yi-Zhong Li
Journal:  Cell Mol Biol Lett       Date:  2021-11-14       Impact factor: 5.787

3.  Clinical Effect of Bone Filling Mesh Container Vertebroplasty in Osteoporotic Compression Fracture.

Authors:  Zhiqian Wang; Guomin Li; Jingming He; Haifeng Huang; Anju Zhao
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  Comparison of Percutaneous Kyphoplasty with or without Pedicle Screw Fixation in Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fractures: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Dichao Huang; Jichong Ying; Dingli Xu; Jianming Chen; Jianlei Liu; Tianming Yu; Yunqiang Zhuang; Long Zhou
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.434

5.  Performance of Double-Arm Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA)-Guided and C-Arm-Guided Percutaneous Kyphoplasty (PKP) to Treat Senile Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures.

Authors:  Jihe Ban; Lilu Peng; Pengpeng Li; Yunhai Liu; Tao Zhou; Guangtao Xu; Xingen Zhang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-08-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.