Literature DB >> 31106851

The DIFFMASK score for predicting difficult facemask ventilation: a cohort study of 46,804 patients.

L H Lundstrøm1, C V Rosenstock1, J Wetterslev2, A K Nørskov3,2.   

Abstract

Facemask ventilation is an essential part of airway management. Correctly predicting difficulties in facemask ventilation may reduce the risk of morbidity and mortality among patients at risk. We aimed to develop and evaluate a weighted risk score for predicting difficult facemask ventilation during anaesthesia. We analysed a cohort of 46,804 adult patients who were assessed pre-operatively airway for 13 predictors of difficult airway management and subsequently underwent facemask ventilation during general anaesthesia. We developed the Difficult Facemask (DIFFMASK) score in two consecutive steps: first, a multivariate regression analysis was performed; and second, the regression coefficients of the adjusted regression model were converted into a clinically applicable weighted point score. The predictive accuracy of the DIFFMASK score was evaluated by assessment of receiver operating characteristic curves. The prevalence of difficult facemask ventilation was 1.06% (95%CI 0.97-1.16). Following conversion of regression coefficients into 0, 1, 2 or 3 points, the cumulated DIFFMASK score ranged from 0 to 18 points and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.82. The Youden index indicated a sum score ≥ 5 as an optimal cut-off value for prediction of difficult facemask ventilation giving a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 59%. The DIFFMASK score indicated that a score of 6-10 points represents a population of patients who may require heightened attention when facemask ventilation is planned, compared with those patients who are obviously at a high- or low risk of difficulties. The DIFFMASK score may be useful in a clinical context but external, prospective validation is needed.
© 2019 Association of Anaesthetists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  airway management; facemask ventilation; pre-operative care

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31106851     DOI: 10.1111/anae.14701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  3 in total

Review 1.  Facemask ventilation.

Authors:  W P L Bradley; C Lyons
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2021-12-03

2.  Voice parameters for difficult mask ventilation evaluation: an observational study.

Authors:  Shuang Cao; Ming Xia; Ren Zhou; Jie Wang; Chen-Yu Jin; Bei Pei; Zhi-Kai Zhou; Yan-Min Qian; Hong Jiang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-12

3.  Utilization of apnea-hypopnea index as a novel predictive factor for difficult mask ventilation in the Chinese population under general anesthesia.

Authors:  Jiayi Wang; Jingjie Li; Pengcheng Zhao; Xuan Pu; Rong Hu; Hong Jiang
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 2.816

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.