Literature DB >> 31106481

Integration of multiple epigenomic marks improves prediction of variant impact in saturation mutagenesis reporter assay.

Dustin Shigaki1, Orit Adato2, Aashish N Adhikari3, Shengcheng Dong4, Alex Hawkins-Hooker5, Fumitaka Inoue6, Tamar Juven-Gershon2, Henry Kenlay5, Beth Martin7, Ayoti Patra8, Dmitry D Penzar9,10, Max Schubach11,12, Chenling Xiong6, Zhongxia Yan12, Alan P Boyle4, Anat Kreimer6,13, Ivan V Kulakovskiy9,10,14,15, John Reid5,16, Ron Unger2, Nir Yosef13, Jay Shendure7, Nadav Ahituv6, Martin Kircher7,11,12, Michael A Beer1,8.   

Abstract

The integrative analysis of high-throughput reporter assays, machine learning, and profiles of epigenomic chromatin state in a broad array of cells and tissues has the potential to significantly improve our understanding of noncoding regulatory element function and its contribution to human disease. Here, we report results from the CAGI 5 regulation saturation challenge where participants were asked to predict the impact of nucleotide substitution at every base pair within five disease-associated human enhancers and nine disease-associated promoters. A library of mutations covering all bases was generated by saturation mutagenesis and altered activity was assessed in a massively parallel reporter assay (MPRA) in relevant cell lines. Reporter expression was measured relative to plasmid DNA to determine the impact of variants. The challenge was to predict the functional effects of variants on reporter expression. Comparative analysis of the full range of submitted prediction results identifies the most successful models of transcription factor binding sites, machine learning algorithms, and ways to choose among or incorporate diverse datatypes and cell-types for training computational models. These results have the potential to improve the design of future studies on more diverse sets of regulatory elements and aid the interpretation of disease-associated genetic variation.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MPRA; enhancers; gene regulation; machine learning; promoters; regulatory variation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31106481      PMCID: PMC6879779          DOI: 10.1002/humu.23797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mutat        ISSN: 1059-7794            Impact factor:   4.878


  28 in total

1.  Predicting the sequence specificities of DNA- and RNA-binding proteins by deep learning.

Authors:  Babak Alipanahi; Andrew Delong; Matthew T Weirauch; Brendan J Frey
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 2.  Organization and function of the 3D genome.

Authors:  Boyan Bonev; Giacomo Cavalli
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  LS-GKM: a new gkm-SVM for large-scale datasets.

Authors:  Dongwon Lee
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 4.  Decoding enhancers using massively parallel reporter assays.

Authors:  Fumitaka Inoue; Nadav Ahituv
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 5.736

5.  Predicting gene expression in massively parallel reporter assays: A comparative study.

Authors:  Anat Kreimer; Haoyang Zeng; Matthew D Edwards; Yuchun Guo; Kevin Tian; Sunyoung Shin; Rene Welch; Michael Wainberg; Rahul Mohan; Nicholas A Sinnott-Armstrong; Yue Li; Gökcen Eraslan; Talal Bin Amin; Ryan Tewhey; Pardis C Sabeti; Jonathan Goke; Nikola S Mueller; Manolis Kellis; Anshul Kundaje; Michael A Beer; Sunduz Keles; David K Gifford; Nir Yosef
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.878

6.  Accurate eQTL prioritization with an ensemble-based framework.

Authors:  Haoyang Zeng; Matthew D Edwards; Yuchun Guo; David K Gifford
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 4.878

7.  Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes.

Authors:  Adam Siepel; Gill Bejerano; Jakob S Pedersen; Angie S Hinrichs; Minmei Hou; Kate Rosenbloom; Hiram Clawson; John Spieth; Ladeana W Hillier; Stephen Richards; George M Weinstock; Richard K Wilson; Richard A Gibbs; W James Kent; Webb Miller; David Haussler
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Identifying a high fraction of the human genome to be under selective constraint using GERP++.

Authors:  Eugene V Davydov; David L Goode; Marina Sirota; Gregory M Cooper; Arend Sidow; Serafim Batzoglou
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Predicting the functional, molecular, and phenotypic consequences of amino acid substitutions using hidden Markov models.

Authors:  Hashem A Shihab; Julian Gough; David N Cooper; Peter D Stenson; Gary L A Barker; Keith J Edwards; Ian N M Day; Tom R Gaunt
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 4.878

10.  ElemeNT: a computational tool for detecting core promoter elements.

Authors:  Anna Sloutskin; Yehuda M Danino; Yaron Orenstein; Yonathan Zehavi; Tirza Doniger; Ron Shamir; Tamar Juven-Gershon
Journal:  Transcription       Date:  2015
View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Enhancer Predictions and Genome-Wide Regulatory Circuits.

Authors:  Michael A Beer; Dustin Shigaki; Danwei Huangfu
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 8.929

2.  Matching whole genomes to rare genetic disorders: Identification of potential causative variants using phenotype-weighted knowledge in the CAGI SickKids5 clinical genomes challenge.

Authors:  Lipika R Pal; Kunal Kundu; Yizhou Yin; John Moult
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.878

3.  Annotating functional effects of non-coding variants in neuropsychiatric cell types by deep transfer learning.

Authors:  Boqiao Lai; Sheng Qian; Hanwei Zhang; Siwei Zhang; Alena Kozlova; Jubao Duan; Jinbo Xu; Xin He
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.779

Review 4.  Massively Parallel Reporter Assays: Defining Functional Psychiatric Genetic Variants Across Biological Contexts.

Authors:  Bernard Mulvey; Tomás Lagunas; Joseph D Dougherty
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 13.382

5.  Meta-analysis of massively parallel reporter assays enables prediction of regulatory function across cell types.

Authors:  Anat Kreimer; Zhongxia Yan; Nadav Ahituv; Nir Yosef
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 4.878

6.  What Do Neighbors Tell About You: The Local Context of Cis-Regulatory Modules Complicates Prediction of Regulatory Variants.

Authors:  Dmitry D Penzar; Arsenii O Zinkevich; Ilya E Vorontsov; Vasily V Sitnik; Alexander V Favorov; Vsevolod J Makeev; Ivan V Kulakovskiy
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  Loop competition and extrusion model predicts CTCF interaction specificity.

Authors:  Wang Xi; Michael A Beer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Prioritization of regulatory variants with tissue-specific function in the non-coding regions of human genome.

Authors:  Shengcheng Dong; Alan P Boyle
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Integrative epigenomic and high-throughput functional enhancer profiling reveals determinants of enhancer heterogeneity in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Taotao Sheng; Shamaine Wei Ting Ho; Wen Fong Ooi; Chang Xu; Manjie Xing; Nisha Padmanabhan; Kie Kyon Huang; Lijia Ma; Mohana Ray; Yu Amanda Guo; Ngak Leng Sim; Chukwuemeka George Anene-Nzelu; Mei Mei Chang; Milad Razavi-Mohseni; Michael A Beer; Roger Sik Yin Foo; Raghav Sundar; Yiong Huak Chan; Angie Lay Keng Tan; Xuewen Ong; Anders Jacobsen Skanderup; Kevin P White; Sudhakar Jha; Patrick Tan
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 11.117

10.  Creating New β-Globin-Expressing Lentiviral Vectors by High-Resolution Mapping of Locus Control Region Enhancer Sequences.

Authors:  Richard A Morgan; Feiyang Ma; Mildred J Unti; Devin Brown; Paul George Ayoub; Curtis Tam; Lindsay Lathrop; Bamidele Aleshe; Ryo Kurita; Yukio Nakamura; Shantha Senadheera; Ryan L Wong; Roger P Hollis; Matteo Pellegrini; Donald B Kohn
Journal:  Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 5.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.