Tricia M Leahey1, Jessica Gokee LaRose2, Autumn Lanoye3, Joseph L Fava4, Rena R Wing5. 1. University of Connecticut, 358 Mansfield Road, Unit 1101, Storrs, CT 06269-1101, USA; tricia.leahey@uconn.edu; 2. Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, 830 E. Main Street, PO Box 980430, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA; jessica.larose@vcuhealth.org; 3. Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, 830 E. Main Street, PO Box 980430, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA; lanoyeam@vcu.edu; 4. The Miriam Hospital's Weight Control and Diabetes Research Center, 196 Richmond Street, Providence, RI, 02903, USA; jfava@lifespan.org; 5. The Miriam Hospital's Weight Control and Diabetes Research Center, 196 Richmond Street, Providence, RI, 02903, USA; rwing@lifespan.org;
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine whether (a) an obesity treatment involving financial incentives yields higher levels of extrinsic motivation for weight management compared to an identical intervention without incentives, (b) extrinsic motivation for weight management mediates, or accounts for, the difference in weight loss outcomes between the two interventions, and (c) there is any evidence that financial incentives and associated extrinsic motivation "crowd out" intrinsic motivation for weight control. METHODS: Participants (N=153, 80.4% Female; BMI = 33.2 ± 5.9) were randomly assigned to a 3-month Web-based behavioral weight loss program (WBWL) or the same program plus small financial incentives delivered consistent with behavioral economics and behavior change theories (WBWL+$). Weight was objectively assessed at baseline, post-treatment (month 3), and after a 9-month no-treatment follow-up phase (month 12). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation for weight management were assessed at months 3 and 12 using a modified version of the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire, with questions added to specifically target extrinsic motivation related to incentives. RESULTS: Compared to WBWL alone, WBWL+$ had better weight loss and higher levels of both extrinsic and intrinsic motivation for weight management (p's≤.02). Moreover, during the no-treatment follow-up phase, the trajectories of weight regain did not significantly differ between WBWL and WBWL+$ (p=.58). Extrinsic motivation was not a significant mediator of treatment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Modest financial incentives delivered consistent with behavioral economics and behavior change theories do not undermine intrinsic motivation for weight management during obesity treatment; in fact, they yield higher levels of both extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Additional research is needed to better understand the mechanisms by which incentives improve outcomes in health behavior change interventions.
OBJECTIVES: To examine whether (a) an obesity treatment involving financial incentives yields higher levels of extrinsic motivation for weight management compared to an identical intervention without incentives, (b) extrinsic motivation for weight management mediates, or accounts for, the difference in weight loss outcomes between the two interventions, and (c) there is any evidence that financial incentives and associated extrinsic motivation "crowd out" intrinsic motivation for weight control. METHODS: Participants (N=153, 80.4% Female; BMI = 33.2 ± 5.9) were randomly assigned to a 3-month Web-based behavioral weight loss program (WBWL) or the same program plus small financial incentives delivered consistent with behavioral economics and behavior change theories (WBWL+$). Weight was objectively assessed at baseline, post-treatment (month 3), and after a 9-month no-treatment follow-up phase (month 12). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation for weight management were assessed at months 3 and 12 using a modified version of the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire, with questions added to specifically target extrinsic motivation related to incentives. RESULTS: Compared to WBWL alone, WBWL+$ had better weight loss and higher levels of both extrinsic and intrinsic motivation for weight management (p's≤.02). Moreover, during the no-treatment follow-up phase, the trajectories of weight regain did not significantly differ between WBWL and WBWL+$ (p=.58). Extrinsic motivation was not a significant mediator of treatment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Modest financial incentives delivered consistent with behavioral economics and behavior change theories do not undermine intrinsic motivation for weight management during obesity treatment; in fact, they yield higher levels of both extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Additional research is needed to better understand the mechanisms by which incentives improve outcomes in health behavior change interventions.
Authors: Stephen T Higgins; Yukiko Washio; Sarah H Heil; Laura J Solomon; Diann E Gaalema; Tara M Higgins; Ira M Bernstein Journal: Prev Med Date: 2011-12-27 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Leslie K John; George Loewenstein; Andrea B Troxel; Laurie Norton; Jennifer E Fassbender; Kevin G Volpp Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-01-20 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Kevin G Volpp; Leslie K John; Andrea B Troxel; Laurie Norton; Jennifer Fassbender; George Loewenstein Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-12-10 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Sandra Wittleder; Adefunke Ajenikoko; Dylaney Bouwman; Yixin Fang; M Diane McKee; Paul Meissner; Stephanie L Orstad; Colin D Rehm; Scott E Sherman; Shea Smith; Victoria Sweat; Lorena Velastegui; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Melanie Jay Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2019-06-20 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Sandra Wittleder; Shea Smith; Binhuan Wang; Jeannette M Beasley; Stephanie L Orstad; Victoria Sweat; Allison Squires; Laura Wong; Yixin Fang; Paula Doebrich; Damara Gutnick; Craig Tenner; Scott E Sherman; Melanie Jay Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-02-26 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Jessica Gokee LaRose; Tricia M Leahey; Autumn Lanoye; Melanie K Bean; Deborah F Tate; Joseph L Fava; Ronald K Evans; Edmond Wickham; Megan M Henderson; Karen Hatley; Molly Diamond Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 2.261