| Literature DB >> 31105990 |
Matteo Vitali1, Nadim Naim Rodriguez2, Pierluigi Pironti1, Andreas Drossinos1, Gaia Di Carlo3, Anshuman Chawla3, Fraschini Gianfranco1.
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) in combination with the dietary supplement Tendisulfur Forte in the treatment of shoulder tendinopathy, lateral epicondylitis, and Achilles tendinopathy.Entities:
Keywords: Achilles tendon; Extracorporeal shockwave therapy; dietary supplement; elbow; rotator cuff ; tendinopathy
Year: 2019 PMID: 31105990 PMCID: PMC6508015 DOI: 10.1080/21556660.2019.1605370
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Drug Assess ISSN: 2155-6660
Achilles tendinopathy group patient characteristics.
| Control group | Tendisulfur group | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of patients | 15 | 15 |
| Mean age (range) | 51 (39–67) | 46 (39–56) |
| Male | 7 | 10 |
| Female | 8 | 5 |
| Symptoms onset (range) | 6 (2–12) | 5 (3–6) |
| Right side | 8 (53%) | 9 (60%) |
| Left side | 5 (33%) | 6 (40%) |
| VISA-A | 7 (6–8) | 7 (6–8) |
| NSAIDs | 8 (53%) | 9 (60%) |
Table showing mean age in years, male and female sub-division, time from symptom onset in months, affected side, VISA-A assessment score at t0, and proportion of patients taking NSAIDs at t0.
Shoulder tendinopathy group patient characteristics.
| Control group | Tendisulfur group | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of patients | 15 | 15 |
| Mean age (range) | 52 (42–69) | 55 (41–59) |
| Male | 6 | 4 |
| Female | 9 | 11 |
| Symptoms onset (range) | 12 (5–18) | 6 (3–12) |
| Right side | 7 (47%) | 9 (60%) |
| Left side | 4 (27%) | 5 (33%) |
| UCLA score | 15 (11–20) | 18 (15–20) |
| NSAIDs | 9 (60%) | 12 (80%) |
Table showing mean age in years, male and female sub-division, time from symptom onset in months, affected side, UCLA assessment score at t0, and proportion of patients taking NSAIDs at t0.
Elbow (epicondylitis) tendinopathy group patient characteristics.
| Control group | Tendisulfur group | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of patients | 15 | 15 |
| Mean age (range) | 45 (36–57) | 44 (31–54) |
| Male | 6 | 7 |
| Female | 9 | 8 |
| Symptoms onset (range) | 5 (3–8) | 5 (3–7) |
| Right side | 8 (53%) | 10 (67%) |
| Left side | 7 (47%) | 5 (33%) |
| Mayo scale | 65 (55–70) | 70 (65–80) |
| NSAIDs | 8 (53%) | 10 (67%) |
Table showing mean age in years, male and female sub-division, time from symptom onset in months, affected side, Mayo Scale assessment score at t0, and proportion of patients taking NSAIDs at t0.
Figure 1.ESWT performed to the Achilles tendon.
Figure 2.ESWT performed to the shoulder.
Figure 3.ESWT performed to the elbow.
Figure 4.Within-group trajectories and between-group within-time difference for shoulder VAS scores.
Figure 5.Within-group trajectories and between-group within-time difference for shoulder UCLA scores.
Shoulder tendinopathy results.
| t0 (pre-treatment) | t1 (7 days) | t2 (30 days) | t3 (60 days) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| UCLA (range) | 15 (11–20) | 19 (14–22) | 20 (16–24) | 23 (17–25) |
| VAS (range) | 7 (6–8) | 6 (4–7) | 5 (4–6) | 5 (4–7) |
| NSAIDs (%) | 9 (60%) | 9 (60%) | 6 (40%) | 6 (40%) |
| Tendisulfur group | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| UCLA (range) | 18 (15–20) | 18 (16–22) | 23 (20–25) | 27 (26–29) |
| VAS (range) | 7 (6–8) | 7 (6–7) | 5 (4–6) | 2 (1–3) |
| NSAIDs (%) | 12 (80%) | 5 (33%) | 1 (7%) | 0 (0%) |
| p-value UCLA | 0.3117 | 0.3240 | 0.1510 | 0.0002 |
| p-value VAS | 0.8480 | 0.7811 | 0.2467 | <0.0001 |
| p-value NSAIDs | 0.2301 | 0.1443 | 0.0308 | 0.0061 |
Table showing shoulder outcomes at 7, 30, and 60 days after treatment. VAS and UCLA values are shown as means with ranges. NSAIDs percentages are to be intended as patients who reported taking NSAIDs at specific intervals. p-values are given for UCLA, VAS scores, and NSAIDs consumption between groups pre-treatment and at each follow-up.
Figure 6.Within-group trajectories and between-group within-time difference for elbow VAS scores.
Figure 7.Within-group trajectories and between-group within-time difference for Mayo elbow scores.
Elbow tendinopathy (epicondylitis) results.
| t0 (pre-treatment) | t1 (7 days) | t2 (30 days) | t3 (60 days) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| Mayo (range) | 65 (55–70) | 70 (55–70) | 70 (60–75) | 70 (65–80) |
| VAS (range) | 7 (7–8) | 8 (7–8) | 6 (5–7) | 6 (5–6) |
| NSAIDs (%) | 8 (53%) | 8 (53%) | 8 (53%) | 8 (53%) |
| Tendisulfur group | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| Mayo (range) | 18 (15–20) | 18 (16–22) | 23 (20–25) | 27 (26–29) |
| VAS (range) | 7 (6–8) | 7 (6–7) | 5 (4–6) | 2 (1–3) |
| NSAIDs (%) | 10 (67%) | 3 (20%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (7%) |
| 0.3429 | 0.2275 | 0.0004 | <0.00001 | |
| 0.443 | 0.0024 | <0.00001 | <0.00001 | |
| 0.4533 | 0.0588 | 0.0001 | 0.0053 |
Table showing shoulder outcomes at 7, 30, and 60 days after treatment. VAS and UCLA values are shown as means with ranges. NSAIDs percentages are to be intended as patients who reported taking NSAIDs at specific intervals. p-values are given for Mayo, VAS scores, and NSAIDs consumption between groups pre-treatment and at each follow-up.
Figure 8.Within-group trajectories and between-group within-time difference for Achilles tendinopathy VAS scores.
Figure 9.Within-group trajectories and between-group within-time difference for Achilles VISA-A scores.
Achilles tendinopathy results.
| t0 (pre-treatment) | t1 (7 days) | t2 (30 days) | t3 (60 days) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| VISA-A (range) | 42 (36–60) | 42 (38–60) | 47 (43–65) | 49 (45–65) |
| VAS (range) | 7 (6–8) | 7 (6–7) | 5 (4–6) | 5 (4–6) |
| NSAIDs (%) | 8 (53%) | 5 (33%) | 5 (33%) | 3 (20%) |
| Tendisulfur group | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| VISA-A (range) | 70 (53–85) | 78 (64–88) | 88 (77–96) | 97 (85–100) |
| VAS (range) | 7 (6–8) | 6 (5–7) | 4 (3–4) | 2 (0–3) |
| NSAIDs (%) | 9 (60%) | 4 (27%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| 0.0013 | <0.00001 | <0.00001 | <0.00001 | |
| 0.5322 | 0.0179 | 0.0014 | <0.00001 | |
| 0.7114 | 0.6892 | 0.0143 | 0.0143 |
Table showing shoulder outcomes at 7, 30, and 60 days after treatment. VAS and UCLA values are shown as means with ranges. NSAIDs percentages are to be intended as patients who reported taking NSAIDs at specific intervals. p-values are given for VISA-A, VAS scores, and NSAIDs consumption between groups pre-treatment and at each follow-up.
Figure 10.Graph Showing overall NSAIDs consumption, taking into consideration all participants from the Tendisulfur Forte group and the control groups.