Literature DB >> 31104985

Characterization of Epiretinal Proliferation in Full-Thickness Macular Holes and Effects on Surgical Outcomes.

Esther Lee Kim1, Adam J Weiner2, Cindy Ung1, Miin Roh3, Jay Wang1, Ivan J Lee2, Natalie T Huang4, Maxwell Stem2, Mohammad Dahrouj1, Dean Eliott1, Demetrios G Vavvas1, Lucy H Y Young1, George A Williams2, Bruce R Garretson2, Ivana K Kim1, Tarek S Hassan2, Shizuo Mukai1, Alan J Ruby2, Lisa J Faia2, Antonio Capone2, Jason Comander1, Leo A Kim1, David M Wu1, Kimberly A Drenser2, Maria A Woodward5, Jeremy D Wolfe2, Yoshihiro Yonekawa6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Epiretinal proliferation is a distinct clinical entity from epiretinal membrane that classically is associated with lamellar macular holes, but its prevalence and association with full-thickness macular holes (FTMH) have not been well described. We characterized macular hole-associated epiretinal proliferation (MHEP) and its effects on long-term surgical outcomes.
DESIGN: Multicenter, interventional, retrospective case-control study. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive eyes that underwent surgery for FTMH with a minimum of 12 months follow-up.
METHODS: All eyes underwent pars plana vitrectomy, removal of any epiretinal membranes, and gas tamponade, with or without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling. Spectral-domain OCT imaging was obtained before and after surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Improvement in visual acuity and single-surgery hole closure rates in eyes with, versus without, MHEP at 12 months.
RESULTS: Seven hundred twenty-five charts were analyzed, and 113 patients met inclusion criteria. Of 113 eyes with FTMH, 30 (26.5%) showed MHEP. Patients with FTMH and MHEP were older (P < 0.002) and more often men (P = 0.001), and showed more advanced macular hole stages than those without MHEP (P = 0.010). A full posterior vitreous detachment was more common in eyes with MHEP (P < 0.004). Twelve months after surgery, FTMH with MHEP patients showed significantly less improvement in visual acuity (P = 0.019) with higher rates of ellipsoid and external limiting membrane defects (P < 0.05) and with a higher rate of failure to close with 1 surgery compared to FTMH without MHEP (26.7% vs. 4.8%; P = 0.002]). Peeling the ILM was associated with improved rates of hole closure in FTMH with MHEP (P < 0.001). Multivariate testing confirmed that the presence of MHEP was an independent risk factor for less visual improvement (P = 0.031) and for single-surgery nonclosure (P = 0.009) and that ILM peeling improved single-surgery closure rates (P = 0.026).
CONCLUSIONS: We found that FTMH with MHEP showed poorer anatomic and visual outcomes after vitrectomy compared with FTMH without MHEP. Internal limiting membrane peeling was associated with improved closure rates and should be considered when MHEP is detected before surgery.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31104985      PMCID: PMC6684822          DOI: 10.1016/j.oret.2019.03.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmol Retina        ISSN: 2468-6530


  21 in total

1.  Epiretinal proliferation in lamellar macular holes and full-thickness macular holes: clinical and surgical findings.

Authors:  Tso-Ting Lai; San-Ni Chen; Chung-May Yang
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Lamellar Hole-Associated Epiretinal Proliferation in Comparison to Epiretinal Membranes of Macular Pseudoholes.

Authors:  Denise Compera; Enrico Entchev; Christos Haritoglou; Renate Scheler; Wolfgang J Mayer; Armin Wolf; Anselm Kampik; Ricarda G Schumann
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Progression of lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation and retinal changes during long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Denise Compera; Ricarda G Schumann; Matteo G Cereda; Alessandra Acquistapace; Viviane Lita; Siegfried G Priglinger; Giovanni Staurenghi; Ferdinando Bottoni
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Assessment of Lamellar Macular Hole and Macular Pseudohole With a Combination of En Face and Radial B-scan Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging.

Authors:  Masayuki Hirano; Yuki Morizane; Shuhei Kimura; Mio Hosokawa; Yusuke Shiode; Shinichiro Doi; Shinji Toshima; Kosuke Takahashi; Mika Hosogi; Atsushi Fujiwara; Ippei Takasu; Toshio Okanouchi; Masaya Kawabata; Fumio Shiraga
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Evidence of Carotenoid in Surgically Removed Lamellar Hole-Associated Epiretinal Proliferation.

Authors:  Akira Obana; Hiroyuki Sasano; Shigetoshi Okazaki; Yoshiro Otsuki; Takahiko Seto; Yuko Gohto
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Prevalence and characteristics of hyporeflective preretinal tissue in vitreomacular interface disorders.

Authors:  Yuji Itoh; Ashleigh L Levison; Peter K Kaiser; Sunil K Srivastava; Rishi P Singh; Justis P Ehlers
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Evolution of lamellar macular hole studied by optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  P G Theodossiadis; V G Grigoropoulos; I Emfietzoglou; P Nikolaidis; I Vergados; M Apostolopoulos; G P Theodossiadis
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Redefining lamellar holes and the vitreomacular interface: an ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography study.

Authors:  Andre J Witkin; Tony H Ko; James G Fujimoto; Joel S Schuman; Caroline R Baumal; Adam H Rogers; Elias Reichel; Jay S Duker
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  VITRECTOMY FOR MACULAR DISORDERS ASSOCIATED WITH LAMELLAR MACULAR HOLE EPIRETINAL PROLIFERATION.

Authors:  Won Seok Choi; Daniel J Merlau; Stanley Chang
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.256

10.  The Comparison of the Surgical Outcome for the Full-Thickness Macular Hole with/without Lamellar Hole-Associated Epiretinal Proliferation.

Authors:  Yuri Ubukata; Hisanori Imai; Keiko Otsuka; Masaya Nishizaki; Rumiko Hara; Mamoru Uenishi; Atsushi Azumi; Makoto Nakamura
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 1.909

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  The clinical and pathogenic significance of atypical epiretinal tissue in macular hole.

Authors:  Sungsoon Hwang; Se Woong Kang
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.535

2.  Identification of epiretinal proliferation in various retinal diseases and vitreoretinal interface disorders.

Authors:  Ismael Chehaibou; Moritz Pettenkofer; Andrea Govetto; Gilad Rabina; SriniVas R Sadda; Jean-Pierre Hubschman
Journal:  Int J Retina Vitreous       Date:  2020-07-10

Review 3.  Primary Lamellar Macular Holes: To Vit or Not to Vit.

Authors:  Lihteh Wu; Ryan Bradshaw
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Surgery outcomes of lamellar macular eyes with or without lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hanyue Xu; Ling Qin; Yifan Zhang; Yinan Xiao; Ming Zhang
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 2.209

5.  Pseudophakic macular edema involving epiretinal proliferation associated with macular hole.

Authors:  Figen Batioglu; Özge Yanık; Sibel Demirel; Emin Özmert
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.848

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.