Mansueto Gomes-Neto1, Danúbia da Cunha de Sá-Caputo2, Laisa Liane Paineiras-Domingos2, Andrea Araujo Brandão3, Mario F Neves4, Pedro J Marin5, Borja Sañudo6, Mario Bernardo-Filho7. 1. Programa de Pós-graduação em Medicina e Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. Electronic address: netofisio@gmail.com. 2. Faculdade Bezerra de Araújo, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Laboratório de Vibrações Mecânicas e Práticas Integrativas, Departamento de Biofísica e Biometria, Instituto de Biologia Roberto Alcantara Gomes e Policlínica Américo Piquet Carneiro, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências Médicas, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 3. Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências Médicas, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Clínica de Hipertensão arterial e Doenças Metabólicas Associadas, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 4. Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências Médicas, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Departamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 5. CYMO Research Institute, Valladolid, Spain. 6. Universidad de Sevilha, Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación, Departamento de Educación Física y Deporte, Sevilla, Spain. 7. Laboratório de Vibrações Mecânicas e Práticas Integrativas, Departamento de Biofísica e Biometria, Instituto de Biologia Roberto Alcantara Gomes e Policlínica Américo Piquet Carneiro, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the effects of whole-body vibration training on metabolic abnormalities, mobility, balance and aerobic capacity in older adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, PEDro, LILACS and SciELO (from the earliest date available to March 2018) for controlled trials that evaluated the effects of whole-body vibration on the health-related outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes. Two reviewers independently selected the studies and performed statistical analyses of the studies. Weighted mean differences, standard mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: In total, 7 studies, involving 279 patients who had type 2 diabetes, that compared whole-body vibration with other exercises and/or controls were included. Individual studies suggested that whole-body vibration was associated with improvements in pain levels, blood flow in the legs, glycated hemoglobin levels and fasting blood glucose levels. Whole-body vibration improved mobility weighted mean differences (-.24 seg; 95% CI -2.0, -0.5; n=96); balance standard mean differences (2.34; 95% CI 1.16, 3.5; n=57); and aerobic capacity standard mean differences (0.7; 95% CI 0.2, 1.3; n=59). CONCLUSIONS: Whole-body vibration could be a useful strategy in the management of the symptoms and disabilities associated with type 2 diabetes; however, it is necessary to perform further studies to reinforce the reported findings.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the effects of whole-body vibration training on metabolic abnormalities, mobility, balance and aerobic capacity in older adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, PEDro, LILACS and SciELO (from the earliest date available to March 2018) for controlled trials that evaluated the effects of whole-body vibration on the health-related outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes. Two reviewers independently selected the studies and performed statistical analyses of the studies. Weighted mean differences, standard mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: In total, 7 studies, involving 279 patients who had type 2 diabetes, that compared whole-body vibration with other exercises and/or controls were included. Individual studies suggested that whole-body vibration was associated with improvements in pain levels, blood flow in the legs, glycated hemoglobin levels and fasting blood glucose levels. Whole-body vibration improved mobility weighted mean differences (-.24 seg; 95% CI -2.0, -0.5; n=96); balance standard mean differences (2.34; 95% CI 1.16, 3.5; n=57); and aerobic capacity standard mean differences (0.7; 95% CI 0.2, 1.3; n=59). CONCLUSIONS: Whole-body vibration could be a useful strategy in the management of the symptoms and disabilities associated with type 2 diabetes; however, it is necessary to perform further studies to reinforce the reported findings.
Authors: Dennis Visser; Elizabeth M Wattel; Karin H L Gerrits; Johannes C van der Wouden; Franka J M Meiland; Aafke J de Groot; Elise P Jansma; Cees M P M Hertogh; Ewout B Smit Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-05-31 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Adeola A Sanni; Anson M Blanks; Cassandra C Derella; Chase Horsager; Reva H Crandall; Jacob Looney; Savanna Sanchez; Kimberly Norland; Bingwei Ye; Jeffrey Thomas; Xiaoling Wang; Ryan A Harris Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2022-03
Authors: Antonio Sarria-Santamera; Zhanna Alexeyeva; Mei Yen Chan; Miguel A Ortega; Angel Asunsolo-Del-Barco; Carlos Navarro-García Journal: Healthcare (Basel) Date: 2022-04-18
Authors: François Talles Medeiros Rodrigues; Ana Paula de Lima Ferreira; Kennedy Freitas Pereira Alves; Thais Vitorino Marques; Daniel Florentino de Lima; Larissa Coutinho de Lucena; Shirley Lima Campos; Wagner Souza Leite; Ricardo Oliveira Guerra; Amandine Rapin; Maria das Graças Rodrigues de Araújo; Redha Taiar Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2022-06-25
Authors: Agata Nowak-Lis; Zbigniew Nowak; Tomasz Gabrys; Urszula Szmatlan-Gabrys; Ladislav Batalik; Vera Knappova Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-11 Impact factor: 4.614