Literature DB >> 31104740

Health Technology Assessment Challenges in Oncology: 20 Years of Value in Health.

Hansoo Kim1, Stephen Goodall2, Danny Liew3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oncology treatments have changed from chemotherapies to targeted therapies and more recently immuno-oncology. This has posed special challenges in the field of health technology assessment (HTA): capturing quality of life (QOL) associated with toxicity due to chemotherapy, crossover upon progression in targeted therapy trials, and survival extrapolation for immuno-oncology drugs.
OBJECTIVES: To showcase 20 years of Value in Health (ViH) publications in oncology.
METHODS: A review was undertaken of oncology articles published in ViH from May 1998 to August 2018. Full-length articles published in ViH with the keywords "oncology," "cancer," "h(a)ematology," and "malignancy" were included for review. Conference abstracts were excluded.
RESULTS: Four major themes were identified: (1) QOL and the development of multiple functional assessment of cancer therapy tools and mapping instruments; (2) analysis of clinical evidence using indirect comparisons, network analyses, and adjustment for crossovers; (3) modeling, Markov models, partitioned survival models, and extrapolation methods; and (4) financial implications and how to deal with uncertainty, introduction of conditional reimbursement, managed entry, and risk share agreements. DISCUSSION: This review article highlights the important role ViH has played in disseminating HTA research in oncology. A few key issues loom on the horizon: precision medicine, further development and practical application of new QOL measures, methods for translating clinical evidence, and exploration of modeling techniques. For a better understanding of the complex interplay between access and financial risk management, ViH will no doubt continue to promote pioneering research in HTA and oncology.
Copyright © 2019 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cost-effectiveness; cost-utility; health technology assessment; oncology; quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31104740     DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  3 in total

Review 1.  Cost-effectiveness and financial risks associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Authors:  Hansoo Kim; Danny Liew; Stephen Goodall
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Decision-analytic modeling as a tool for selecting optimal therapy incorporating hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with hematological malignancy.

Authors:  Shigeo Fuji; Arnon Nagler; Mohamad Mohty; Bipin Savani; Roni Shouval
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 3.  Implications of Oncology Trial Design and Uncertainties in Efficacy-Safety Data on Health Technology Assessments.

Authors:  Dario Trapani; Kiu Tay-Teo; Megan E Tesch; Felipe Roitberg; Manju Sengar; Sara C Altuna; Michael J Hassett; Armando A Genazzani; Aaron S Kesselheim; Giuseppe Curigliano
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 3.109

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.