| Literature DB >> 31104416 |
Hyemi Song1, Bong-Kwang Jung1, Jaeeun Cho1, Taehee Chang1, Sun Huh2, Jong-Yil Chai1,3.
Abstract
Anisakiasis is a zoonotic disease induced by anisakid nematodes, and endoscopic inspection is used for a diagnosis or remedy for it. Anisakis simplex, Anisakis physeteris, and Pseudoterranova decipiens had been reported to be the major species causing human infections, particularly, in Japan. However, in Korea, recent studies strongly suggested that Anisakis pegreffii is the major species of human infections. To support this suggestion, we collected anisakid larvae (n=20) from 20 human patients who were undergone gastrointestinal endoscopy at a health check-up center in Korea, and molecular identification was performed on the larvae using PCR-RFLP analysis and gene sequencing of rDNA ITS regions and mtDNA cox2. In addition, anisakid larvae (n=53) collected from the sea eel (Astroconger myriaster) were also examined for comparison with those extracted from humans. The results showed that all human samples (100%) were identified as A. pegreffii, whereas 90.7% of the samples from the sea eel were A. pegreffii with the remaining 9.3% being Hysterothylacium aduncum. Our study confirmed that A. pegreffii is the predominant species causing human anisakiasis in Korea, and this seems to be due to the predominance of this larval type in the fish (sea eels) popularly consumed by the Korean people. The possibility of human infection with H. aduncum in Korea is also suggested.Entities:
Keywords: Anisakis pegreffii; Anisakis simplex sensu stricto; Hysterothylacium aduncum; anisakiasis; anisakid larva; gastrointestinal endoscopy; sequencing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31104416 PMCID: PMC6526215 DOI: 10.3347/kjp.2019.57.2.207
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Parasitol ISSN: 0023-4001 Impact factor: 1.341
Identification of Anisakis larvae extracted by gastrointestinal endoscopy from health checkup patients using gene sequencing
| Type of endoscopy | Date of extraction | Patient sex/age | ITS region | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Sample 1 | Gastroscopy | Jan. 2019 | F/66 | 100 | 99.4 | 76.7 | 97.9 | 96.3 | 86.5 |
|
| |||||||||
| Sample 2 | Gastroscopy | May. 2018 | F/51 | 100 | 99.4 | 76.7 | - | - | - |
|
| |||||||||
| Sample 3 | Gastroscopy | Jun. 2018 | F/66 | 100 | 99.4 | 76.7 | - | - | - |
|
| |||||||||
| Sample 4 | Colonoscopy | Jun. 2018 | M/59 | 100 | 99.4 | 76.7 | 100.0 | 95.2 | 86.2 |
|
| |||||||||
| Sample 5 | Gastroscopy | Jun. 2018 | F/47 | 100 | 99.4 | 76.7 | - | - | - |
|
| |||||||||
| Sample 6 | Gastroscopy | Jun. 2018 | M/61 | 100 | 99.4 | 76.7 | - | - | - |
|
| |||||||||
| Sample 7 | Gastroscopy | Aug. 2018 | M/55 | 100 | 99.4 | 76.7 | 99.7 | 95.5 | 86.5 |
|
| |||||||||
| Sample 8 | Gastroscopy | Aug. 2018 | M/69 | 100 | 99.4 | 76.7 | 100.0 | 95.2 | 86.2 |
|
| |||||||||
| Sample 9 | Gastroscopy | Sep. 2018 | M/67 | 100 | 99.4 | 76.7 | 98.1 | 96.6 | 86.8 |
|
| |||||||||
| Sample 10 | Gastroscopy | Sep. 2018 | M/57 | 100 | 99.4 | 76.7 | - | - | - |
|
| |||||||||
| Sample 11 | Gastroscopy | Sep. 2018 | F/34 | 100 | 99.4 | 76.7 | 97.9 | 96.3 | 86.5 |
|
| |||||||||
| Sample 12 | Gastroscopy | Sep. 2018 | F/56 | 100 | 99.4 | 76.7 | 99.7 | 95.0 | 86.0 |
|
| |||||||||
| Sample 13 | Gastroscopy | Oct. 2018 | F/56 | 100 | 99.4 | 76.7 | 97.9 | 96.3 | 86.5 |
|
| |||||||||
| Sample 14 | Gastroscopy | Oct. 2018 | M/44 | 100 | 99.4 | 76.7 | 100.0 | 95.2 | 86.2 |
|
| |||||||||
| Sample 15 | Gastroscopy | Nov. 2018 | M/61 | 100 | 99.4 | 76.7 | 99.7 | 95.0 | 86.2 |
|
| |||||||||
| Sample 16 | Gastroscopy | Nov. 2018 | F/69 | 100 | 99.4 | 76.7 | 100.0 | 95.2 | 86.2 |
|
| |||||||||
| Sample 17 | Gastroscopy | Nov. 2018 | F/45 | 100 | 99.4 | 76.7 | 100.0 | 95.2 | 86.2 |
|
| |||||||||
| Sample 18 | Gastroscopy | Dec. 2018 | M/57 | 100 | 99.4 | 76.7 | 99.7 | 95.0 | 86.5 |
|
| |||||||||
| Sample 19 | Gastroscopy | Dec. 2018 | F/53 | 100 | 99.4 | 76.7 | 99.5 | 94.7 | 85.8 |
|
| |||||||||
| Sample 20 | Gastroscopy | Jun. 2017 | F/31 | 100 | 99.4 | 76.7 | - | - | - |
-, data not available.
Fig. 1PCR-RFLP analysis of ITS region for molecular identification of anisakid larvae. Each PCR product was digested with HinfI and analyzed on 2% agarose gel. Sample H1 and H3, genomic DNA of Anisakis spp. from humans; H2 and H4, A. pegreffii (250, 300, and 350 bp); S1 and S3, genomic DNA of Anisakis spp. from the sea eel; S2, A. pegreffii (370 and 650 bp); S4, H. aduncum; M, 100-bp ladder.
Fig. 2Phylogenetic trees showing the genetic relationship of anisakid genera. Phylogenetic trees were analyzed with Anisakis larvae from humans and reference sequences from GenBank. The trees were constructed by the UPGMA using MEGA-X based on (A) ITS region (311 bp) and (B) cox2 gene (378 bp). The scale bar represents the evolutionary distance.