Literature DB >> 31103688

Industrial SO2 emissions treatment in China: A temporal-spatial whole process decomposition analysis.

Ye Hang1, Qunwei Wang2, Yizhong Wang1, Bin Su3, Dequn Zhou1.   

Abstract

Effectively treating industrial SO2 emissions depends on the synergy of different factors from the industrial SO2 generation source to the end of treatment. Applying a whole process treatment perspective, this paper decomposes industrial SO2 emissions into six specific driving factors in three whole process treatment dimensions (i.e. source prevention, process control, and end-of-pipe treatment), and economic scale. A temporal index decomposition analysis (Temporal-IDA), attribution analysis (AA), and spatial index decomposition analysis (Spatial-IDA) methods are then applied to quantify each dimension's treatment effect and its spatial differences. The empirical study across 30 regions in China using data from 2005 to 2015 shows that: (1) The end-of-pipe treatment is the dominant dimension for decreasing industrial SO2 emissions, followed by process control. The contribution of source prevention to reduce industrial SO2 emissions has begun to appear, however, there remains room for further improvement; (2) End-of-pipe treatment strength and energy intensity are key factors in reducing industrial SO2 emissions; Inner Mongolia, Henan, and Shandong are the main contributors; (3) The treatment emphasis are different among regions; as such, there are different treatment effects across the three dimensions of the whole process treatment. Regions can be classified into four categories: the Leading type, Process-dependent type, End-dependent type, and Lagging type. Based on the empirical results, this paper identifies the policy implications of promoting whole process treatment on China's industrial SO2 emissions.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Driving factor; Industrial SO(2); Temporal-spatial decomposition; Whole process treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31103688     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  2 in total

1.  China industrial environmental database 1998-2015.

Authors:  Haoqi Qian; Feizhou Ren; Yanran Gong; Rong Ma; Wendong Wei; Libo Wu
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 8.501

2.  Identifying Driving Factors of Jiangsu's Regional Sulfur Dioxide Emissions: A Generalized Divisia Index Method.

Authors:  Junliang Yang; Haiyan Shan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.