Literature DB >> 31103391

Evaluation of Cxbladder and Adjudication of Atypical Cytology and Equivocal Cystoscopy.

Badrinath Konety1, Neal Shore2, Andrew Karim Kader3, Sima Porten4, Siamak Daneshmand5, Tony Lough6, Yair Lotan7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cxbladder diagnostic tests combine genomic information from urinary mRNA with phenotypic information to either rule out low-risk individuals or identify patients at a high risk of urothelial carcinoma (UC).
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of Cxbladder and urine cytology, and Cxbladder's adjudication of atypical cytology and equivocal cystoscopy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a retrospective analysis of pooled data from three prospective Cxbladder clinical trials and one real-world clinical study. Physicians were blinded to Cxbladder results, and Cxbladder providers were blinded to clinical results. This study analyzed diverse urology practices in the USA, Australia, and New Zealand. A total of 1784 consecutive, prospectively recruited patients with hematuria or previously diagnosed UC provided 852 samples with both local cytology and Cxbladder results; 153 had atypical cytologies and 14 had both atypical cytology and equivocal cystoscopy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Negative predictive value (NPV) and proportion of tumors missed for Cxbladder and local cytology, and evaluation of Cxbladder for adjudicating atypical cytology and equivocal cystoscopy. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Cxbladder ruled out 35% of patients and NPV 97% (95% confidence interval [CI] 94-98%) compared with 93% (95% CI 91-94%) for cytology; Cxbladder missed 8.5% and cytology missed 63% of tumors. UC was diagnosed in 26/153 cases of atypical cytology (17%). Cxbladder correctly adjudicated all these patients including those with both atypical cytology and equivocal cystoscopy; these patients had a positive Cxbladder result and were diagnosed with UC by pathology. The incidence of patients with both atypical cytology and equivocal cystoscopy is low.
CONCLUSIONS: Cxbladder correctly adjudicated all patients diagnosed with UC among those with atypical cytology and equivocal cystoscopy, and outperformed cytology for accurately identifying patients who do not have UC. PATIENT
SUMMARY: Cxbladder accurately rules out patients who do not have cancer, and adjudicates cytology and cystoscopy with inconclusive results, minimizing the need for patients to undergo further unnecessary tests and procedures.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atypical cytology; Cxbladder; Cytology; Diagnosis; Equivocal cystoscopy; Urothelial carcinoma

Year:  2019        PMID: 31103391     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.04.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  8 in total

Review 1.  Molecular Oncology of Bladder Cancer from Inception to Modern Perspective.

Authors:  Soum D Lokeshwar; Maite Lopez; Semih Sarcan; Karina Aguilar; Daley S Morera; Devin M Shaheen; Bal L Lokeshwar; Vinata B Lokeshwar
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 2.  Urine Biopsy-Liquid Gold for Molecular Detection and Surveillance of Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Uttam Satyal; Abhishek Srivastava; Philip H Abbosh
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  The Role of New Technologies in the Diagnosis and Surveillance of Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Carcinoma: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Monocentric Study of the XPERT© Bladder Cancer Monitor and Narrow Band Imaging© Cystoscopy.

Authors:  Gad Singer; Venkat M Ramakrishnan; Uwe Rogel; Andreas Schötzau; Daniel Disteldorf; Philipp Maletzki; Jean-Pascal Adank; Marc Hofmann; Tilo Niemann; Sylvia Stadlmann; Antonio Nocito; Kurt Lehmann; Lukas J Hefermehl
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 4.  The Role of Novel Bladder Cancer Diagnostic and Surveillance Biomarkers-What Should a Urologist Really Know?

Authors:  Rafaela Malinaric; Guglielmo Mantica; Lorenzo Lo Monaco; Federico Mariano; Rosario Leonardi; Alchiede Simonato; André Van der Merwe; Carlo Terrone
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Longitudinal follow-up and performance validation of an mRNA-based urine test (Xpert® Bladder Cancer Monitor ) for surveillance in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Barrett Cowan; Eric Klein; Ken Jansz; Karl Westenfelder; Timothy Bradford; Chad Peterson; Douglas Scherr; Lawrence I Karsh; Blair Egerdie; Alfred Witjes; Andrew Trainer; Richard Harris; Bernard Goldfarb; Stanley Flax; Robert Kroeger; Buffi Boyd; Joseph Liao; Sanjay Patel; Julia Bridge; Victor Reuter; Neil Quigley; Sarah Brown; Suling Zhao; Malini Satya; Michael Bates; Iris M Simon; Scott Campbell; Yair Lotan
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 5.969

6.  An evaluation of the real world use and clinical utility of the Cxbladder Monitor assay in the follow-up of patients previously treated for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Madhusudan Koya; Sue Osborne; Christophe Chemaslé; Sima Porten; Anne Schuckman; Andrew Kennedy-Smith
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 2.264

7.  The Diagnostic Performance of Cxbladder Resolve, Alone and in Combination with Other Cxbladder Tests, in the Identification and Priority Evaluation of Patients at Risk for Urothelial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jay D Raman; Laimonis Kavalieris; Badrinath Konety; Sima Porten; Siamak Daneshmand; Yair Lotan; Ronald Loo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  Follow-up in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: facts and future.

Authors:  J Alfred Witjes
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-12-26       Impact factor: 4.226

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.