Literature DB >> 31103324

Mismatch repair deficiency as a predictive marker for response to adjuvant radiotherapy in endometrial cancer.

Casper Reijnen1, Heidi V N Küsters-Vandevelde2, Clemens F Prinsen2, Leon F A G Massuger3, Marc P M L Snijders4, Stefan Kommoss5, Sara Y Brucker5, Janice S Kwon6, Jessica N McAlpine6, Johanna M A Pijnenborg3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency is found in 20 to 40% of endometrial cancers (ECs) and was recently identified as a discerning feature of one of the four prognostic subgroups identified by The Cancer Genome Atlas. There is accumulating evidence that MMR proteins are involved in the DNA repair processes following radiotherapy. We investigated the predictive value of MMR status for response to adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with stage IB/II, grade 3 endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC).
METHODS: A retrospective multicenter cohort study was performed to compare patients with histopathologically confirmed stage IB/II grade 3 EEC with and without adjuvant radiotherapy. Patients were classified according to the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE) identifying ECs as either MMR-deficient, POLE, p53abn or p53wt. Multivariable Cox regression analysis explored associations between adjuvant treatment and outcome.
RESULTS: A total of 128 patients were analyzed, including 57 patients (43.0%) with MMR-deficient EECs. Baseline characteristics were comparable, except a higher proportion of MMR-deficient EECs were stage II (36.8% vs. 15.5%, p = 0.006). Eighty-two patients (64.1%) received adjuvant radiotherapy (external beam [n = 55], vaginal brachytherapy [n = 27]). In multivariable analysis, adjuvant radiotherapy was associated with improved disease-specific survival in patients with MMR-deficient EECs (hazard ratio 0.19, 95%-CI 0.05-0.77), but not in patients with MMR-proficient EECs (hazard ratio 0.92, 95%-CI 0.37-2.31).
CONCLUSION: Adjuvant radiotherapy improved survival in patients with MMR-deficient EECs. MMR status could be used as a predictive biomarker to select patients that benefit most from adjuvant radiotherapy.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endometrial cancer; Mismatch repair deficiency; Predictive biomarker; Radiotherapy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31103324     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.03.097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  18 in total

Review 1.  Immunotherapy: Checkpoint Inhibitors in Lynch-Associated Gynecologic Cancers.

Authors:  J Stuart Ferriss; M Yvette Williams-Brown
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-08-23

Review 2.  Incorporating Molecular Diagnostics into Treatment Paradigms for Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Brenna E Swift; Lilian T Gien
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2022-07-06

3.  Postoperative Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone for Stage III Endometrial Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Ji Geun Yoo; Jin Hwi Kim; Chan Joo Kim; Hae Nam Lee; Min Jong Song; Dong Choon Park; Joo Hee Yoon; Sang Il Kim; Soo Young Hur; Sung Jong Lee
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.339

Review 4.  Impact of Molecular Classification on Treatment Paradigms in Uterine Cancers.

Authors:  Casey M Cosgrove; David Barrington; Floor J Backes
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  MLH1 Deficiency-Triggered DNA Hyperexcision by Exonuclease 1 Activates the cGAS-STING Pathway.

Authors:  Junhong Guan; Changzheng Lu; Qihuang Jin; Huiming Lu; Xiang Chen; Lei Tian; Yanbin Zhang; Janice Ortega; Junqiu Zhang; Silvia Siteni; Mingyi Chen; Liya Gu; Jerry W Shay; Anthony J Davis; Zhijian J Chen; Yang-Xin Fu; Guo-Min Li
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 6.  Gynecological Cancers Caused by Deficient Mismatch Repair and Microsatellite Instability.

Authors:  Madhura Deshpande; Phillip A Romanski; Zev Rosenwaks; Jeannine Gerhardt
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Clinicopathological significance of deficient DNA mismatch repair and MLH1 promoter methylation in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Annukka Pasanen; Mikko Loukovaara; Ralf Bützow
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 7.842

8.  Clinicopathological and molecular characterisation of 'multiple-classifier' endometrial carcinomas.

Authors:  Alicia León-Castillo; Ester Gilvazquez; Remi Nout; Vincent Thbm Smit; Jessica N McAlpine; Melissa McConechy; Stefan Kommoss; Sara Y Brucker; Joseph W Carlson; Elisabeth Epstein; Tilman T Rau; Robert A Soslow; Raji Ganesan; Xavier Matias-Guiu; Esther Oliva; Beth T Harrison; David N Church; C Blake Gilks; Tjalling Bosse
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2020-01-12       Impact factor: 7.996

9.  Molecular Classification of the PORTEC-3 Trial for High-Risk Endometrial Cancer: Impact on Prognosis and Benefit From Adjuvant Therapy.

Authors:  Alicia León-Castillo; Stephanie M de Boer; Melanie E Powell; Linda R Mileshkin; Helen J Mackay; Alexandra Leary; Hans W Nijman; Naveena Singh; Pamela M Pollock; Paul Bessette; Anthony Fyles; Christine Haie-Meder; Vincent T H B M Smit; Richard J Edmondson; Hein Putter; Henry C Kitchener; Emma J Crosbie; Marco de Bruyn; Remi A Nout; Nanda Horeweg; Carien L Creutzberg; Tjalling Bosse
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  A Modern Approach to Endometrial Carcinoma: Will Molecular Classification Improve Precision Medicine in the Future?

Authors:  Simone Marnitz; Till Walter; Birgid Schömig-Markiefka; Tobias Engler; Stefan Kommoss; Sara Yvonne Brucker
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.