Literature DB >> 31102023

Exposure time versus cytotoxicity for anticancer agents.

David M Evans1, Jianwen Fang2, Thomas Silvers1, Rene Delosh1, Julie Laudeman1, Chad Ogle1, Russell Reinhart1, Michael Selby1, Lori Bowles1, John Connelly1, Erik Harris1, Julia Krushkal2, Larry Rubinstein2, James H Doroshow3, Beverly A Teicher4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Time is a critical factor in drug action. The duration of inhibition of the target or residence time of the drug molecule on the target often guides drug scheduling.
METHODS: The effects of time on the concentration-dependent cytotoxicity of approved and investigational agents [300 compounds] were examined in the NCI60 cell line panel in 2D at 2, 3, 7 and in 3D 11 days.
RESULTS: There was a moderate positive linear relationship between data from the 2-day NCI60 screen and the 3-, 7- and 11-day and a strong positive linear relationship between 3-, 7- and 11-day luminescence screen IC50s by Pearson correlation analysis. Cell growth inhibition by agents selective for a specific cell cycle phase plateaued when susceptible cells were growth inhibited or killed. As time increased the depth of cell growth inhibition increased without change in the IC50. DNA interactive agents had decreasing IC50s with increasing exposure time. Epigenetic agents required longer exposure times; several were only cytotoxic after 11 days' exposure. For HDAC inhibitors, time had little or no effect on concentration response. There were potency differences amongst the three BET bromodomain inhibitors tested, and an exposure duration effect. The PARP inhibitors, rucaparib, niraparib, and veliparib reached IC50s < 10 μM in some cell lines after 11 days.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that variations in compound exposure time may reflect either mechanism of action or compound chemical half-life. The activity of slow-acting compounds may optimally be assessed in spheroid models that can be monitored over prolonged incubation times.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Concentration times time; CxT; Epigenetic agents; NCI60

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31102023      PMCID: PMC8127868          DOI: 10.1007/s00280-019-03863-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  62 in total

Review 1.  Targeting DNA Repair in Cancer: Beyond PARP Inhibitors.

Authors:  Jessica S Brown; Brent O'Carrigan; Stephen P Jackson; Timothy A Yap
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 2.  Survivin and IAP proteins in cell-death mechanisms.

Authors:  Dario C Altieri
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 3.  Histone deacetylase inhibitors as immunomodulators in cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  Li Shen; Ashley Orillion; Roberto Pili
Journal:  Epigenomics       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 4.778

4.  Metabolism, mechanism of action and sensitivity profile of fluorocyclopentenylcytosine (RX-3117; TV-1360).

Authors:  Godefridus J Peters; Kees Smid; Leonardo Vecchi; Ietje Kathmann; Dzjemma Sarkisjan; Richard J Honeywell; Nienke Losekoot; Osnat Ohne; Aric Orbach; Eran Blaugrund; Lak Shin Jeong; Young Bok Lee; Chang-Ho Ahn; Deog Joong Kim
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 5.  Mechanisms of anti-cancer action and pharmacology of clofarabine.

Authors:  Anna Zhenchuk; Koroush Lotfi; Gunnar Juliusson; Freidoun Albertioni
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 5.858

6.  DNA fingerprinting of the NCI-60 cell line panel.

Authors:  Philip L Lorenzi; William C Reinhold; Sudhir Varma; Amy A Hutchinson; Yves Pommier; Stephen J Chanock; John N Weinstein
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 7.  Understanding and targeting resistance mechanisms in NSCLC.

Authors:  Julia Rotow; Trever G Bivona
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 8.  Targeting the Hedgehog signaling pathway in cancer: beyond Smoothened.

Authors:  Annelies Gonnissen; Sofie Isebaert; Karin Haustermans
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-06-10

Review 9.  Histone deacetylase inhibitors for cancer therapy: An evolutionarily ancient resistance response may explain their limited success.

Authors:  John A Halsall; Bryan M Turner
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 4.345

10.  Pharmacodynamic response and inhibition of growth of human tumor xenografts by the novel histone deacetylase inhibitor PXD101.

Authors:  Jane A Plumb; Paul W Finn; Robert J Williams; Morwenna J Bandara; M Rosario Romero; Claire J Watkins; Nicholas B La Thangue; Robert Brown
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.261

View more
  1 in total

1.  In vivo assessment of the drug interaction between sorafenib and paracetamol in rats.

Authors:  Agnieszka Karbownik; Katarzyna Sobańska; Tomasz Grabowski; Joanna Stanisławiak-Rudowicz; Anna Wolc; Edmund Grześkowiak; Edyta Szałek
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.333

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.