Literature DB >> 31101458

Generosity, collegiality, and scientific accuracy when writing and reviewing original research.

Shane P Desselle1, Aleda M Chen2, Mohamed Amin3, Parisa Aslani4, Dalia Dawoud5, Michael J Miller6, Lotte Stig Norgaard7.   

Abstract

In spite of concerns about the lack of recognition for its conduct, peer review remains the backbone of scientific evaluation and advancement of scientific knowledge. Given the challenges and evolution in the peer review system, collegiality among authors, reviewers, editors, and even consumers of content is more important than ever. While general guidance has been provided recently in the pharmacy literature, this commentary provides both philosophical underpinnings and specific mechanics for enhancing effectiveness of reviews and improving the quality of writing for authors concurrently, thus examining each major section in an original research contribution. Generosity, courtesy, diligence, thoroughness, and empathy are required of us all to advance the scientific paradigm of our discipline and profession.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31101458     DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.04.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm        ISSN: 1551-7411


  2 in total

1.  Editorial Peer Reviewers as Shepherds, Rather Than Gatekeepers.

Authors:  Joel D Boerckel; Lilian I Plotkin; Natalie A Sims
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 6.390

2.  An awakening in the force-The birth of ERCSP.

Authors:  Shane P Desselle; Michelle L Blakely; Justin Gatwood; Maguy Saffouh El Hajj; Sara McMillan
Journal:  Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm       Date:  2021-02-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.