Literature DB >> 31100586

Infant-adult vocal interaction dynamics depend on infant vocal type, child-directedness of adult speech, and timeframe.

Gina M Pretzer1, Lukas D Lopez2, Eric A Walle2, Anne S Warlaumont3.   

Abstract

This study explored the temporal contingencies between infant and adult vocalizations as a function of the type of infant vocalization, whether adult caregivers' vocalizations were infant-directed or other-directed, and the timescale of analysis. We analyzed excerpts taken from day-long home audio recordings that were collected from nineteen 12- to 13-month-old American infants and their caregivers using the LENA system. Three 5-minute sections having high child vocalization rates were identified within each recording and coded by trained researchers. Infant and adult vocalizations were sequenced and defined as contingent if they occurred within 1 s, 2 s, or 5 s of each other. When using 1 s or 2 s definitions of temporal adjacency, infant vocalizations generally predicted subsequent infant-directed adult vocalizations. A reflexive vocalization (i.e. a cry or a laugh) was the strongest predictor. Likewise, within 1-2 s timeframes, infant-directed adult speech generally predicted infant vocalizations with reflexive vocalizations being particularly predictive. Infant vocalizations predicted fewer subsequent other-directed adult vocalizations and were less likely following other-directed adult vocalizations when considering up to 5 s lags. This suggests an understudied communicative role for infants of non-infant-directed adult speech. These results demonstrate the importance of timescale in studying infant-adult interactions, support the communicative significance of reflexive infant vocalizations and other-directed adult speech in addition to more commonly studied vocalization types, and highlight the challenges of determining direction(s) of influence when using only two-event sequences.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Infant vocalizations; Infant-adult interactions; Infant-directed speech; LENA; Other-directed speech; Temporal contingencies

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31100586     DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2019.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infant Behav Dev        ISSN: 0163-6383


  7 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of the predictability of LENA™ automated measures for child language development.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Wang; Rondeline Williams; Laura Dilley; Derek M Houston
Journal:  Dev Rev       Date:  2020-06-11

2.  Conversation Initiation of Mothers, Fathers, and Toddlers in their Natural Home Environment.

Authors:  Mark VanDam; Lauren Thompson; Elizabeth Wilson-Fowler; Sarah Campanella; Kiley Wolfenstein; Paul De Palma
Journal:  Comput Speech Lang       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 1.899

3.  Practice and experience predict coarticulation in child speech.

Authors:  Margaret Cychosz; Benjamin Munson; Jan R Edwards
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2021-04-06

4.  Efficient Estimation of Children's Language Exposure in Two Bilingual Communities.

Authors:  Margaret Cychosz; Anele Villanueva; Adriana Weisleder
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 2.674

5.  Exploratory dynamics of vocal foraging during infant-caregiver communication.

Authors:  V P S Ritwika; Gina M Pretzer; Sara Mendoza; Christopher Shedd; Christopher T Kello; Ajay Gopinathan; Anne S Warlaumont
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Adult responses to infant prelinguistic vocalizations are associated with infant vocabulary: A home observation study.

Authors:  Lukas D Lopez; Eric A Walle; Gina M Pretzer; Anne S Warlaumont
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Analysis of acoustic and voice quality features for the classification of infant and mother vocalizations.

Authors:  Jialu Li; Mark Hasegawa-Johnson; Nancy L McElwain
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 2.723

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.