Kazuto Matsunaga1, Kazuki Hamada2, Keiji Oishi3, Masafumi Yano3, Yoshikazu Yamaji2, Tsunahiko Hirano2. 1. Department of Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Disease, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Japan. Electronic address: kazmatsu@yamaguchi-u.ac.jp. 2. Department of Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Disease, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Japan. 3. Department of Medicine and Clinical Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Physicians' perception of asthma control has a direct impact on treatment options and patients' outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the differences between patients and their physicians in the perception of asthma control. Moreover, factors associated with this discordance were explored. METHODS: A multicenter, cross-sectional survey was conducted in patients visiting primary or secondary facilities for routine asthma reviews. Before the review, patients completed the 5-iteam Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) under the supervision of a medical staff. Physicians recorded their perception of the patients' asthma control without viewing the ACQ results. After the review, physicians completed the demographic and clinical data. RESULTS: A total of 1697 patients were included. ACQ results showed that asthma was well controlled in 52.2% of the patients, but physicians perceived that 79.6% of patients were well controlled. The concordance analyzed by the kappa index was weak (0.27). The discordant physician-patient pairs had significantly worse ACQ scores than the concordant pairs (P < .0001), but the use of neither inhaled corticosteroids nor other controller medications showed any differences between the groups. In a multivariate model, ACQ score of 0.75 or more and lack of lung function assessment within the previous 6 months were independently associated with the physician-patient discordance in the perception of asthma control. CONCLUSIONS: The subjective perception of the physicians did not show a good agreement with the patients' asthma control based on validated ACQ scores, with increased rates of discordance among patients whose asthma was not well controlled and patients who had not received lung function assessment.
BACKGROUND: Physicians' perception of asthma control has a direct impact on treatment options and patients' outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the differences between patients and their physicians in the perception of asthma control. Moreover, factors associated with this discordance were explored. METHODS: A multicenter, cross-sectional survey was conducted in patients visiting primary or secondary facilities for routine asthma reviews. Before the review, patients completed the 5-iteam Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) under the supervision of a medical staff. Physicians recorded their perception of the patients' asthma control without viewing the ACQ results. After the review, physicians completed the demographic and clinical data. RESULTS: A total of 1697 patients were included. ACQ results showed that asthma was well controlled in 52.2% of the patients, but physicians perceived that 79.6% of patients were well controlled. The concordance analyzed by the kappa index was weak (0.27). The discordant physician-patient pairs had significantly worse ACQ scores than the concordant pairs (P < .0001), but the use of neither inhaled corticosteroids nor other controller medications showed any differences between the groups. In a multivariate model, ACQ score of 0.75 or more and lack of lung function assessment within the previous 6 months were independently associated with the physician-patient discordance in the perception of asthma control. CONCLUSIONS: The subjective perception of the physicians did not show a good agreement with the patients' asthma control based on validated ACQ scores, with increased rates of discordance among patients whose asthma was not well controlled and patients who had not received lung function assessment.
Authors: Maarten Beekman; Julie Hales; Mona Al-Ahmad; Ricardo Del Olmo; Tze Lee Tan Journal: NPJ Prim Care Respir Med Date: 2022-10-08 Impact factor: 3.289