Literature DB >> 31100349

Analysis of clinical characteristics and surgical results of upper lumbar disc herniations.

I Yüce1, O Kahyaoğlu2, P Mertan3, H Çavuşoğlu4, Y Aydın5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Upper lumbar disc herniation (ULDH) is described mostly in levels L1-2, L2-3 and L3-4 of the lumbar spine in the literature and accounts for less than 10% of all disc herniations. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and surgical results of ULDH.
METHODS: In all, 367 patients treated for upper lumbar disc herniation and 2137 treated for lower lumbar disc herniation (LLDH) between January 2008 and January 2017 were included. They were followed up postoperatively at 12 months by radiological investigations, back and leg pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Preoperative data comprised age group (20-40, 40-60, 60-80 years), gender (male, female), lumbar level (L1-2, L2-3, L3-4), side of disc herniation (left, right) and symptom duration (0-3, 3-6, 6-9 months).
RESULTS: ODI and VAS scores improved significantly postoperatively for all patients. Of the 367 ULDH patients, 169 were female (54%) and 198 male (46%), with a mean age of 55.8±10.1 years (range, 35-71). In 174 (47.4%) patients symptom duration was 3 months, in 99 (27.0%) 3-6 months, and in 94 (25.6%) 6-9 months. At 12 months, ODI, back and leg pain VAS scores showed a significant difference in improvement according to ULDH symptom duration<3 months and to LLDH symptom duration<6 months.
CONCLUSION: Microdiscectomy in ULDH provided sufficient and safe decompression of neural structures, with significant reduction in symptoms and disability. We suggest that early surgical treatment is an important factor for good outcome in ULDH.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Microdiscectomy; Surgical outcome; Upper lumbar disc herniation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31100349     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2019.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurochirurgie        ISSN: 0028-3770            Impact factor:   1.553


  5 in total

1.  Treatment of Upper Lumbar Disc Herniation with a Transforaminal Endoscopic Technique.

Authors:  Zuowei Wang; Fengzeng Jian; Hao Wu; Xingwen Wang; Kai Wang; Wanru Duan; Zhenlei Liu; Zan Chen
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-04-28

2.  Is there a correlation between upper lumbar disc herniation and multifidus muscle degeneration? A retrospective study of MRI morphology.

Authors:  Chong Liu; Jiang Xue; Jingjing Liu; Gang Ma; Abu Moro; Tuo Liang; Haopeng Zeng; Zide Zhang; Guoyong Xu; Zhaojun Lu; Xinli Zhan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Comparison of microendoscopic discectomy and percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for upper lumbar disc herniation: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  WeiJun Xu; Bingxuan Yang; Xidan Lai; Xinxin Hong; Zihao Chen; Dongqing Yu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Curative Effects of Remote Home Management Combined with Feng's Spinal Manipulation on the Treatment of Elderly Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation.

Authors:  Yaqing Min; Peng Xu
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 2.682

5.  Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy versus Conventional Open Lumbar Discectomy for Upper Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Comparative Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ziquan Li; Cong Zhang; Weisheng Chen; Shugang Li; Bin Yu; Hong Zhao; Jianxiong Shen; Jianguo Zhang; Yipeng Wang; Keyi Yu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 3.246

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.