Literature DB >> 31100332

Randomized 36-month follow-up of posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations.

A D Loguercio1, M Rezende2, M F Gutierrez3, T F Costa4, A Armas-Vega5, A Reis6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this double blind, randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the 36-month clinical performance of the layering technique (incremental [IF] vs. bulk-fill [BF]) in posterior composite resin restorations bonded with self-etch (SE) and etch-and-rinse (ER) strategies.
METHODS: Posterior dental cavities of 72 participants (n = 236), with a cavity depth of at least 3 mm, were randomly divided into four groups. The restorations were bonded using either the Tetric N-Bond ER or Tetric N-Bond SE. The composite resin Tetric N-Ceram Bulk-Fill was placed either IF or using BF. Two experienced and calibrated examiners evaluated the restorations using FDI criteria in the baseline and after 12, 24 and 36-month. The statistical analyses were performed using the Wilcoxon Signed rank test (α = 0.05)
RESULTS: After 36-month, 14, 21 and 33 restorations showed minor fractures, marginal desadaptation and color mismatch, respectively (p > 0.05). Thirty-three restorations showed some marginal discoloration after 36-month with significant difference between ER (3 for ER-IF; 3 for ER-BF) and SE (14 for SE-IF; 12 for SE-BF; p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The BF technique showed excellent clinical performance, which was comparable during the 36-month of clinical evaluation with the 2-mm IF and it was not affected by the adhesive strategy. However, using the ER strategy reduces the risk of some marginal discoloration, irrespectively of the filling technique. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The bulk-fill material showed excellent clinical behavior when compared to its use in an incremental filling technique, mainly when associated to etch-and-rinse adhesive material after 3 years of clinical evaluation.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bulk-fill; Etch-and-rinse; Incremental filling; Postoperative sensitivity; Randomized controlled trial; Self-etch

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31100332     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.05.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  7 in total

1.  Thirty-six-month clinical evaluation of posterior high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composite restorations in a high caries incidence population: interim results of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Márcia de Almeida Durão; Ana Karina Maciel de Andrade; Amanda Maciel do Prado; Sirley Raiane Mamede Veloso; Lynn Morena Tavares Maciel; Marcos Antônio Japiassú Resende Montes; Gabriela Queiroz de Melo Monteiro
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Adhesive restoration of molars affected by molar incisor hypomineralization: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Tatiane Zahn Cardoso Rolim; Thays Regina Ferreira da Costa; Leticia Maira Wambier; Ana Claudia Chibinski; Denise Stadler Wambier; Luciana Reichert da Silva Assunção; José Vitor Borges Nogara de Menezes; Juliana Feltrin-Souza
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Is the clinical performance of composite resin restorations in posterior teeth similar if restored with incremental or bulk-filling techniques? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Patrícia Valéria Manozzo Kunz; Letícia Maíra Wambier; Marina da Rosa Kaizer; Gisele Maria Correr; Alessandra Reis; Carla Castiglia Gonzaga
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 3.606

Review 4.  Compliance of randomized controlled trials in posterior restorations with the CONSORT statement: a systematic review of methodology.

Authors:  Márcia Rezende; Ana Cristina Rodrigues Martins; Jadson Araújo da Silva; Alessandra Reis; Juliana Larocca de Geus
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 3.606

5.  Randomized prospective clinical trial of class II restorations using flowable bulk-fill resin composites: 4-year follow-up.

Authors:  Isis Almela Endo Hoshino; André Luiz Fraga Briso; Lara Maria Bueno Esteves; Paulo Henrique Dos Santos; Sandra Meira Borghi Frascino; Ticiane Cestari Fagundes
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.606

6.  Influence of Matrix Type on Marginal Gap Formation of Deep Class II Bulk-Fill Composite Restorations.

Authors:  Britta Hahn; Imme Haubitz; Ralf Krug; Gabriel Krastl; Sebastian Soliman
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Class II resin composite restorations-tunnel vs. box-only in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Peter J Preusse; Julia Winter; Stefanie Amend; Matthias J Roggendorf; Marie-Christine Dudek; Norbert Krämer; Roland Frankenberger
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 3.573

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.