Literature DB >> 31099901

Diagnostics of DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa: Are sperm chromatin structure analysis and sperm chromatin dispersion tests (SCD-HaloSpermG2® ) comparable?

Susanne Liffner1, Isabelle Pehrson1, Laura García-Calvo1, Elizabeth Nedstrand1, Stefan Zalavary1, Mats Hammar1, Heriberto Rodríguez-Martínez1, Manuel Álvarez-Rodríguez1.   

Abstract

Men affected with idiopathic infertility often display basic spermiogramme values similar to fertile individuals, questioning the diagnostic impact of the World Health Organization (WHO) thresholds used. This study explored sperm DNA fragmentation in single ejaculates from 14 fertile donors and 42 patients with idiopathic infertility providing semen for assisted reproductive techniques in a university fertility clinic. Each ejaculate was simultaneously studied for sperm DNA fragmentation by the flow cytometer-based sperm chromatin structure analysis (SCSA) and the new light-microscopy-based sperm chromatin dispersion assay (SCD-HaloSpermG2® ), before and after sperm selection for in vitro fertilisation with a colloid discontinuous gradient. The WHO semen variables did not differ between groups, but DNA fragmentation after SCSA (DFI) or SCD (SDF) was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in patients (DFI: 40.2% ± 3.0 vs. SDF: 40.3% ± 1.4) than in fertile donors (DFI: 17.1% ± 2.1 vs. SDF: 20.9% ± 2.5). Sperm selection led to lower proportions of DNA-fragmented spermatozoa (DFI: 11.9 ± 1.7 vs. SCD: 10.0 ± 0.9, p < 0.05). The techniques output correlated highly and significantly (r2  = 0.82). DNA fragmentation is confirmed as a relevant variable for scrutinising patients with idiopathic infertility, beyond the evidently insufficient WHO semen analyses. Since both techniques yielded similar results, the reduced necessity of complex equipment when running SCD ought to be considered for a clinical setting.
© 2019 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SCD; SCSA; idiopathic infertility; semen analyses; sperm DNA fragmentation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31099901     DOI: 10.1111/and.13316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Andrologia        ISSN: 0303-4569            Impact factor:   2.775


  5 in total

1.  Influence of Lifestyle and Environmental Factors on Semen Quality in Ghanaian Men.

Authors:  Richard Michael Blay; Abigail Duah Pinamang; Augustine E Sagoe; Ewurama Dedea Ampadu Owusu; Nii Koney-Kwaku Koney; Benjamin Arko-Boham
Journal:  Int J Reprod Med       Date:  2020-10-21

2.  The Effects of In Vitro Incubation of Asthenoteratozoospermic Semen after Density Gradient Centrifugation at Room Temperature and 37°C on Sperm Parameters, Chromatin Quality and DNA Fragmentation in a Short Time Period.

Authors:  Motahareh Karimi Zarchi; Behnam Maleki; Mahmood Dehghani Ashkezari; Leila Motamed Zadeh; Azam Agha-Rahimi
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2020 Oct-Dec

3.  Correlation between sperm DNA fragmentation index and semen parameters in 418 men seen at a fertility center.

Authors:  Láyonal Germán Acosta Campos; Lissett Chiscul Requejo; Carlos Antonio Rivas Miñano; Jheny Díaz Orrego; Elmer Chávez Loyaga; Luis Gonzales Cornejo
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2021-07-21

4.  The Relationship between the Testicular Blood Flow and the Semen Parameters of Rams during the Selected Periods of the Breeding and Non-Breeding Seasons.

Authors:  Natalia Kozłowska; Ricardo Faundez; Kamil Borzyszkowski; Sebastian Dąbrowski; Tomasz Jasiński; Małgorzata Domino
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Evaluation of the sperm DNA fragmentation index in infertile Japanese men by in-house flow cytometric analysis.

Authors:  Akiyoshi Osaka; Hiroshi Okada; Sae Onozuka; Takashi Tanaka; Toshiyuki Iwahata; Yukihito Shimomura; Yoshitomo Kobori; Kazutaka Saito; Kouhei Sugimoto
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.