BACKGROUND: Entinostat, a selective class I histone deacetylase inhibitor, has been reported to enhance the activity of cytotoxic agents and suppress expression of PAX3-FOXO1 in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS). PROCEDURES: Entinostat was tested against three rhabdomyosarcoma cell lines using 96-hour drug exposure. Entinostat alone or in binary combination with vincristine, actinomycin D or cyclophosphamide was tested in ARMS and two embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS) xenograft models. Tumor growth was measured at weekly intervals. Drug-induced changes in acetylated histone H3(K9) and entinostat pharmacokinetics were determined. RESULTS: In vitro, the IC50 concentration of entinostat ranged from 280 to 1300 nM. In vivo, entinostat significantly inhibited the growth of only Rh10 xenografts. For most studies, entinostat did not potentiate the activity of the cytotoxic agent. Exceptions included the vincristine and entinostat combination for Rh10 and the entinostat and actinomycin D combination for Rh10 and Rh18, although the effects were modest. For Rh18, the combination of entinostat with vincristine showed evidence of an antagonistic interaction compared with single-agent vincristine. Pharmacokinetic studies showed the average Cmax was 569.4 ng/mL (1.51 μM) with Tmax at 15 minutes, and total exposure (AUC0-12 h ) was 435.6 h × ng/mL. Entinostat treatment increased acetylated histone H3. CONCLUSIONS: Entinostat demonstrated modest antitumor activity in only one of four models at dose and shedule that gave drug exposures relevant to human treatment. The addition of entinostat to standard-of-care cytotoxic agents was in most instances no more effective than the cytotoxic agents used alone. Entinostat demonstrated target inhibition with increased histone 2A acetylation.
BACKGROUND:Entinostat, a selective class I histone deacetylase inhibitor, has been reported to enhance the activity of cytotoxic agents and suppress expression of PAX3-FOXO1 in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS). PROCEDURES: Entinostat was tested against three rhabdomyosarcoma cell lines using 96-hour drug exposure. Entinostat alone or in binary combination with vincristine, actinomycin D or cyclophosphamide was tested in ARMS and two embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS) xenograft models. Tumor growth was measured at weekly intervals. Drug-induced changes in acetylated histone H3(K9) and entinostat pharmacokinetics were determined. RESULTS: In vitro, the IC50 concentration of entinostat ranged from 280 to 1300 nM. In vivo, entinostat significantly inhibited the growth of only Rh10 xenografts. For most studies, entinostat did not potentiate the activity of the cytotoxic agent. Exceptions included the vincristine and entinostat combination for Rh10 and the entinostat and actinomycin D combination for Rh10 and Rh18, although the effects were modest. For Rh18, the combination of entinostat with vincristine showed evidence of an antagonistic interaction compared with single-agent vincristine. Pharmacokinetic studies showed the average Cmax was 569.4 ng/mL (1.51 μM) with Tmax at 15 minutes, and total exposure (AUC0-12 h ) was 435.6 h × ng/mL. Entinostat treatment increased acetylated histone H3. CONCLUSIONS:Entinostat demonstrated modest antitumor activity in only one of four models at dose and shedule that gave drug exposures relevant to human treatment. The addition of entinostat to standard-of-care cytotoxic agents was in most instances no more effective than the cytotoxic agents used alone. Entinostat demonstrated target inhibition with increased histone 2A acetylation.
Authors: Jerry Jaboin; Jason Wild; Habib Hamidi; Chand Khanna; Chong Jai Kim; Robert Robey; Susan E Bates; Carol J Thiele Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2002-11-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Peter J Houghton; Christopher L Morton; Chandra Tucker; Debbie Payne; Edward Favours; Claire Cole; Richard Gorlick; E Anders Kolb; Wendong Zhang; Richard Lock; Hernan Carol; Mimi Tajbakhsh; C Patrick Reynolds; John M Maris; Joshua Courtright; Stephen T Keir; Henry S Friedman; Charles Stopford; Joseph Zeidner; Jianrong Wu; Tiebin Liu; Catherine A Billups; Javed Khan; Sherry Ansher; Jian Zhang; Malcolm A Smith Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Qin C Ryan; Donna Headlee; Milin Acharya; Alex Sparreboom; Jane B Trepel; Joseph Ye; William D Figg; Kyunghwa Hwang; Eun Joo Chung; Anthony Murgo; Giovanni Melillo; Yusri Elsayed; Manish Monga; Mikhail Kalnitskiy; James Zwiebel; Edward A Sausville Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-04-25 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lia Gore; Mace L Rothenberg; Cindy L O'Bryant; Mary Kay Schultz; Alan B Sandler; Denise Coffin; Candice McCoy; Astrid Schott; Catherine Scholz; S Gail Eckhardt Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-06-25 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Junyu Yang; Chong Gao; Miao Liu; Yao-Chung Liu; Junsu Kwon; Jun Qi; Xi Tian; Alicia Stein; Yanjing V Liu; Nikki R Kong; Yue Wu; Shenyi Yin; Jianzhong Xi; Zhiyuan Chen; Kalpana Kumari; Hannan Wong; Hongbo Luo; Leslie E Silberstein; Julie A I Thoms; Ashwin Unnikrishnan; John E Pimanda; Daniel G Tenen; Li Chai Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2021-09-30 Impact factor: 13.312
Authors: Andrew Bukowinski; Bill Chang; Joel M Reid; Xiaowei Liu; Charles G Minard; Jane B Trepel; Min-Jung Lee; Elizabeth Fox; Brenda J Weigel Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2021-01-12 Impact factor: 3.838
Authors: Holly L Pacenta; Wendy Allen-Rhoades; David Langenau; Peter J Houghton; Charles Keller; Christine M Heske; Michael D Deel; Corinne M Linardic; Jack F Shern; Elizabeth Stewart; Brian Turpin; Douglas J Harrison; Javed Khan; Leo Mascarenhas; Stephen X Skapek; William H Meyer; Douglas S Hawkins; Eleanor Y Chen; James F Amatruda; Pooja Hingorani; Theodore W Laetsch Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Maximilian M L Knott; Tilman L B Hölting; Shunya Ohmura; Thomas Kirchner; Florencia Cidre-Aranaz; Thomas G P Grünewald Journal: Cancer Metastasis Rev Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 9.264