| Literature DB >> 31099083 |
Hanneke van der Meide1,2, Truus Teunissen3, Leo H Visser1,4, Merel Visse1.
Abstract
Chronic obstructive and pulmonary disease (COPD) has detrimental effects on individuals with the disease. COPD causes breathlessness, morbidity and associated psychosocial distress. This study was guided by the phenomenological question what is it like to have COPD and situated in Van Manen's phenomenology of practice. Experiential material was gathered through phenomenological interviews. Four themes emerged from the lived experiences of patients living with COPD: breath as a possibility; being vigilant; fighting a losing battle; and feeling isolated from others. For patients with COPD, breathing becomes ever-present and shifts from the invisible background of daily living to the central activity around which everyday life is organised. COPD patients always monitor their own breath and scrutinise the environment on possible dangers that can affect their breathing. Whenever moving or being involved in an activity, a part of their mind is preoccupied with the breathing. Although COPD patients realise that no amount of good behaviour will matter and that the decline of their lungs is inevitable, they make every effort to take good care of their body. They anticipate and avoid triggers of breathlessness isolating them from social interactions and activities. The appearance of the body as a source of social embarrassment also has an isolating effect. This study shows that breathlessness is a constant horizon that frames the experience of COPD patients. It is a limiting factor and determines their entire life. A more profound understanding of these experiences in healthcare professionals will contribute to person-centred care for COPD patients.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990COPDzzm321990; breathlessness; lifeworld-led health care; lived experiences; phenomenology
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31099083 PMCID: PMC7074040 DOI: 10.1111/scs.12713
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Scand J Caring Sci ISSN: 0283-9318
Figure 1Phenomenological analysis.
Reflective methods in phenomenological analysis
| Reflective method | Central activities | ‘Rational’ |
|---|---|---|
| Immersion in lived experience |
Reading interview transcripts Listening audio files Writing down our own thoughts Identifying lived experience descriptions |
Suspending understanding Becoming familiar with the data Surfacing fore‐understanding Removal of the text that is not suitable for phenomenological analysis (e.g. opinions, factual information) |
| Composing textual portrayals |
Editing of the actual content but not the phenomenological content (the meaning) Avoiding general statements and theoretical terms Focusing on the words and phrases that express meaning and the removal of unnecessary text Changing tense and pronouns if necessary |
Textual portrayals are crafted from different parts of the verbatim transcribed interviews Ensure the story flows The aim is to convey ‘felt’ knowing that is difficult to describe The textual story serves as a methodological device for phenomenological analysis |
| Phenomenological thematisation |
Wholistic reading of textual portrayals: focusing on the meaning of the portrayal as a whole Detailed reading of textual portrayals: searching for sentences and words that seemed to particularly reveal this meaning |
The goal of thematisation is disclosing the meaning structure of the phenomenon as appears in the interviews The meaning structure shows possibilities of experiences |
| Reflective writing |
Describing the themes with the aid of textual portrayals and phenomenological literature |
Further explication of the phenomenon by a reflective process of writing and rewriting in which new insights may emerge. Literature is used to illuminate meanings: explicating the already but sometimes hidden meaning |
Figure 2Example of the process of converting a transcript into a textual portrayal.