| Literature DB >> 31098904 |
Karolina Szymańska1, Dagmara Strumińska-Parulska2, Jerzy Falandysz3,4,5.
Abstract
The hazel bolete Leccinellum pseudoscabrum (Kallenb.) Mikšík 2017 specimens and beneath soil layer (0-10 cm) have been examined on the occasion of 210Po and 210Pb activity concentrations, the nuclide bioaccumulation potential by species and distribution in fruit bodies. Mushrooms and forest soils came from six geographically distant locations in the northern and central parts of Poland. The threat to humans from 210Po and 210Pb contained in mushrooms has been also assessed. The absolute values of the 210Po radioactivity, respectively, in caps and stems of fruit bodies were in the range 0.74 ± 0.06-8.59 ± 0.36 Bq kg-1 dry biomass and from 0.81 ± 0.06-8.23 ± 0.37 Bq kg-1 dry biomass, while the values of the 210Pb radioactivity in caps and stems were in the range 0.61 ± 0.04-6.33 ± 0.22 Bq kg-1 dry biomass and 0.83 ± 0.04-4.59 ± 0.24 Bq kg-1 dry biomass, respectively. A potential related effective dose assessment showed that mushrooms L. pseudoscabrum can contribute at 0.89-10.3 μSv kg-1 db from 210Po decay and 0.42-4.37 μSv kg-1 db from 210Pb decay.Entities:
Keywords: 210Pb; 210Po; Effective radiation dose; Foraging; Mushrooms; Soil
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31098904 PMCID: PMC6570668 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-05376-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 4.223
Fig. 1The map of hazel bolete (L. pseudoscabrum) fruit bodies and surface soil sampling locations
The average values of 210Po activity concentrations for fruit bodies of hazel bolete (L. pseudoscabrum) and topsoil
| Mushroom samples and sampling locations | 210Po activity concentration (Bq kg−1 dry biomass) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caps | Stems | Whole mushroom | Topsoil | ||
| Bugaj | Bu1 | 2.19 ± 0.14 | 1.95 ± 0.14 | 2.07 ± 0.88 | n/a |
| Bu2 | 2.03 ± 0.12 | 1.67 ± 0.14 | 1.87 ± 0.89 | n/a | |
| Bu3 | 0.98 ± 0.08 | 1.03 ± 0.09 | 1.01 ± 0.57 | n/a | |
| Bu4 | 2.00 ± 0.13 | 1.38 ± 0.11 | 1.69 ± 0.75 | n/a | |
| Bu5 | 2.00 ± 0.14 | 1.51 ± 0.06 | 1.78 ± 0.69 | n/a | |
| Gołdap | Go1 | 2.53 ± 0.11 | 2.34 ± 0.12 | 2.44 ± 0.36 | n/a |
| Go2 | 3.11 ± 0.11 | 2.76 ± 0.15 | 3.02 ± 0.44 | n/a | |
| Go3 | 3.38 ± 0.24 | 1.90 ± 0.13 | 2.45 ± 0.43 | n/a | |
| Go4 | 2.69 ± 0.15 | 1.70 ± 0.08 | 2.12 ± 0.25 | n/a | |
| Ciechocinek | C1 | 4.06 ± 0.21 | 2.48 ± 0.16 | 3.28 ± 1.20 | n/a |
| C2 | 3.51 ± 0.21 | 3.07 ± 0.22 | 3.29 ± 1.29 | n/a | |
| C3 | 3.75 ± 0.20 | 2.48 ± 0.15 | 3.13 ± 1.10 | n/a | |
| C4 | 3.69 ± 0.03 | 2.73 ± 0.19 | 3.20 ± 1.09 | n/a | |
| C5 | 2.06 ± 0.13 | 4.19 ± 0.18 | 3.14 ± 0.97 | n/a | |
| Sławno | Sł1 | 2.49 ± 0.13 | 2.31 ± 0.15 | 2.41 ± 0.82 | 25.3 ± 0.6 |
| Sł2 | 0.74 ± 0.06 | 2.02 ± 0.14 | 1.36 ± 0.65 | 31.5 ± 0.8 | |
| Sł3 | 2.46 ± 0.17 | 1.80 ± 0.14 | 2.21 ± 0.60 | 29.8 ± 0.4 | |
| Sł4 | 2.67 ± 0.14 | 3.20 ± 0.28 | 2.86 ± 0.93 | 28.9 ± 0.4 | |
| Sł5 | 2.54 ± 0.24 | 1.85 ± 0.15 | 2.30 ± 1.05 | 37.8 ± 0.4 | |
| Sł6 | 2.58 ± 0.23 | 2.80 ± 0.20 | 2.64 ± 1.08 | 28.5 ± 0.5 | |
| Złotów | Z1 | 2.67 ± 0.13 | 0.81 ± 0.06 | 1.91 ± 0.44 | 18.8 ± 1.3 |
| Borkowo | Bo1 | 8.59 ± 0.36 | 1.05 ± 0.07 | 5.47 ± 1.04 | 102 ± 2 |
| Bo2 | 2.32 ± 0.17 | 1.87 ± 0.16 | 2.04 ± 0.45 | 45.8 ± 1.0 | |
| Bo3 | 1.64 ± 0.08 | 8.23 ± 0.37 | 5.16 ± 1.11 | 48.1 ± 1.0 | |
n/a not analyzed
The average values of 210Pb activity concentrations for fruit bodies of hazel bolete (L. pseudoscabrum) and topsoil and 210Po/210Pb activity ratios
| Mushroom samples and sampling locations | 210Pb activity concentration (Bq kg−1 dry biomass) | 210Po/210Pb activity ratio | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caps | Stems | Whole mushroom | Topsoil | Whole mushroom | Topsoil | ||
| Bugaj | Bu1 | 5.88 ± 0.44 | 1.10 ± 0.05 | 3.50 ± 2.01 | n/a | 0.59 ± 0.42 | n/a |
| Bu2 | 1.68 ± 0.10 | 0.83 ± 0.04 | 1.29 ± 0.56 | n/a | 1.45 ± 0.93 | n/a | |
| Bu3 | 0.61 ± 0.04 | 0.83 ± 0.04 | 0.72 ± 0.26 | n/a | 1.40 ± 0.93 | n/a | |
| Bu4 | 1.09 ± 0.08 | 0.78 ± 0.04 | 0.94 ± 0.39 | n/a | 1.80 ± 1.09 | n/a | |
| Bu5 | 1.39 ± 0.09 | 0.89 ± 0.05 | 1.14 ± 0.45 | n/a | 1.54 ± 0.86 | n/a | |
| Gołdap | Go1 | 1.76 ± 0.09 | 1.51 ± 0.05 | 1.64 ± 0.25 | n/a | 1.49 ± 0.32 | n/a |
| Go2 | 1.70 ± 0.08 | 1.77 ± 0.08 | 1.72 ± 0.30 | n/a | 1.76 ± 0.40 | n/a | |
| Go3 | 2.00 ± 0.12 | 0.99 ± 0.05 | 1.36 ± 0.19 | n/a | 1.79 ± 0.40 | n/a | |
| Go4 | 1.73 ± 0.10 | 1.16 ± 0.07 | 1.40 ± 0.18 | n/a | 1.51 ± 0.26 | n/a | |
| Ciechocinek | C1 | 1.96 ± 0.04 | 1.51 ± 0.07 | 1.74 ± 0.34 | n/a | 1.89 ± 0.78 | n/a |
| C2 | 1.52 ± 0.07 | 1.41 ± 0.06 | 1.46 ± 0.38 | n/a | 2.25 ± 1.05 | n/a | |
| C3 | 1.86 ± 0.09 | 1.56 ± 0.06 | 1.71 ± 0.50 | n/a | 1.83 ± 0.83 | n/a | |
| C4 | 1.45 ± 0.10 | 1.07 ± 0.07 | 1.25 ± 0.53 | n/a | 2.57 ± 1.40 | n/a | |
| C5 | 1.38 ± 0.06 | 2.53 ± 0.12 | 1.97 ± 0.63 | n/a | 1.60 ± 0.71 | n/a | |
| Sławno | Sł1 | 1.23 ± 0.09 | 1.63 ± 0.11 | 1.42 ± 0.59 | 25.1 ± 0.7 | 1.70 ± 0.91 | 2.21 ± 0.08 |
| Sł2 | 0.63 ± 0.06 | 1.66 ± 0.09 | 1.13 ± 0.50 | 38.1 ± 0.8 | 1.20 ± 0.78 | 1.81 ± 0.06 | |
| Sł3 | 1.72 ± 0.15 | 1.32 ± 0.05 | 1.56 ± 0.49 | 30.0 ± 0.7 | 1.41 ± 0.58 | 2.12 ± 0.06 | |
| Sł4 | 1.17 ± 0.11 | 0.94 ± 0.07 | 1.09 ± 0.50 | 30.2 ± 0.7 | 2.62 ± 1.48 | 2.12 ± 0.06 | |
| Sł5 | 1.56 ± 0.12 | 1.59 ± 0.11 | 1.57 ± 0.53 | 40.1 ± 0.9 | 1.47 ± 0.84 | 1.95 ± 0.05 | |
| Sł6 | 1.15 ± 0.08 | 1.51 ± 0.13 | 1.25 ± 0.43 | 30.6 ± 1.8 | 2.11 ± 1.13 | 1.91 ± 0.12 | |
| Złotów | Z1 | 1.95 ± 0.11 | 0.88 ± 0.09 | 1.52 ± 0.43 | 11.2 ± 0.4 | 1.26 ± 0.46 | 4.64 ± 0.34 |
| Borkowo | Bo1 | 6.33 ± 0.22 | 0.85 ± 0.06 | 4.06 ± 0.63 | 100 ± 4 | 1.35 ± 0.33 | 1.27 ± 0.06 |
| Bo2 | 2.13 ± 0.16 | 1.17 ± 0.07 | 1.53 ± 0.28 | 106 ± 2 | 1.33 ± 0.38 | 0.52 ± 0.02 | |
| Bo3 | 1.22 ± 0.11 | 4.59 ± 0.24 | 3.02 ± 0.77 | 59.2 ± 1.6 | 1.71 ± 0.57 | 1.24 ± 0.04 | |
n/a not analyzed
Fig. 2Cluster analysis (Ward’s method) based on the 210Po and 210Pb activity concentrations as well as BCF and DR values of analyzed mushrooms and the sampling places
Fig. 3PCA analysis (no rotation) based on the 210Po and 210Pb activity concentrations as well as BCF and DR values of analyzed mushrooms and the sampling places (Sławno, Złotów, Borkowo)
The values of bioconcentration factor (BCF) and discrimination ratio (DR) for fruit bodies of hazel bolete (L. pseudoscabrum)
| Mushroom samples and sampling locations | Bioconcentration factor (BCF) | Discrimination ratio (DR) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 210Po | 210Pb | 210Po | 210Pb | ||
| Bugaj | Bu1 | n/a | n/a | 1.14 ± 0.11 | 5.34 ± 0.48 |
| Bu2 | n/a | n/a | 1.42 ± 0.14 | 2.03 ± 0.16 | |
| Bu3 | n/a | n/a | 0.96 ± 0.12 | 0.73 ± 0.06 | |
| Bu4 | n/a | n/a | 1.44 ± 0.14 | 1.41 ± 0.12 | |
| Bu5 | n/a | n/a | 1.33 ± 0.11 | 1.57 ± 0.13 | |
| Gołdap | Go1 | n/a | n/a | 1.12 ± 0.07 | 1.16 ± 0.07 |
| Go2 | n/a | n/a | 3.03 ± 0.20 | 0.96 ± 0.06 | |
| Go3 | n/a | n/a | 1.03 ± 0.10 | 2.02 ± 0.16 | |
| Go4 | n/a | n/a | 1.15 ± 0.09 | 1.50 ± 0.12 | |
| Ciechocinek | C1 | n/a | n/a | 1.69 ± 0.14 | 1.30 ± 0.06 |
| C2 | n/a | n/a | 1.17 ± 0.11 | 1.08 ± 0.06 | |
| C3 | n/a | n/a | 1.57 ± 0.13 | 1.19 ± 0.08 | |
| C4 | n/a | n/a | 1.47 ± 0.13 | 1.35 ± 0.13 | |
| C5 | n/a | n/a | 0.48 ± 0.04 | 0.54 ± 0.04 | |
| Sławno | Sł1 | 0.10 ± 0.03 | 0.06 ± 0.02 | 1.19 ± 0.10 | 0.76 ± 0.07 |
| Sł2 | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.38 ± 0.04 | 0.38 ± 0.04 | |
| Sł3 | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 2.19 ± 0.22 | 1.30 ± 0.12 | |
| Sł4 | 0.10 ± 0.03 | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 1.53 ± 0.16 | 1.24 ± 0.15 | |
| Sł5 | 0.06 ± 0.03 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 2.68 ± 0.33 | 0.98 ± 0.10 | |
| Sł6 | 0.09 ± 0.04 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 2.25 ± 0.25 | 0.76 ± 0.08 | |
| Złotów | Z1 | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 0.14 ± 0.04 | 4.79 ± 0.40 | 2.21 ± 0.26 |
| Borkowo | Bo1 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 11.6 ± 0.9 | 7.45 ± 0.62 |
| Bo2 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.01 ± 0.005 | 0.74 ± 0.08 | 1.83 ± 0.17 | |
| Bo3 | 0.11 ± 0.02 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.17 ± 0.01 | 0.27 ± 0.03 | |
n/a not available (soil not analyzed)
Fig. 4The assessed average values of the annual effective radiation dose from 210Po and 210Pb decay while ingested with hazel bolete (L. pseudoscabrum) mushrooms by adult