Literature DB >> 31098818

Index tumor volume on MRI as a predictor of clinical and pathologic outcomes following radical prostatectomy.

Dordaneh Sugano1, Abhinav Sidana1, Amit L Jain2, Brian Calio1, Sonia Gaur3, Mahir Maruf1, Maria Merino4, Peter Choyke3, Baris Turkbey3, Bradford J Wood5, Peter A Pinto1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Index tumor volume (ITV) measured on radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens has been shown to be associated with adverse pathologic and oncologic outcomes. We evaluate the value of ITV calculated from prostate multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in predicting adverse clinical and pathologic outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from a prospectively maintained, single-institution database were analyzed for patients who underwent mpMRI prior to RP (2007-2016). Index tumor was defined as a T2-visible lesion with the longest diameter. Adverse pathologic outcomes were extraprostatic extension (EPE), lymph node invasion (LNI), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), and positive margins (PM). Logistic and Cox proportional hazard regression were used to assess associations with adverse pathology and biochemical recurrence (BCR), respectively.
RESULTS: Of the 455 patients included, EPE, LNI, SVI and PM were present in 23.5%, 6.2%, 5.5% and 15.7% patients, respectively. Patients with adverse pathologic outcomes had larger median ITV. ITV was found to be an independent predictor of EPE (OR 1.22, p = 0.010), LNI (OR 1.39, p = 0.001), and SVI (OR 1.28, p = 0.009), but not PM (OR 1.03, p = 0.522). Combination of ITV and PSA was found to have predictive ability comparable to that of modified Partin tables (EPE:ITV + PSAAUC = 0.71 vs. PartinAUC = 0.71; LNI:ITV + PSAAUC = 0.92 vs. PartinAUC = 0.90, SVI:ITV + PSAAUC = 0.78 vs. PartinAUC = 0.82). 5 year BCR-free survival (median follow-up 24.9 months) was higher for patients with ITV < 2 cc (84.1% vs. 58.5%, p = 0.001). However, ITV was not found to be an independent predictor of BCR (HR 1.69, p = 0.130).
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that ITV measured on mpMRI is a predictor of adverse pathologic and clinical outcomes and can aid in preoperative risk assessment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarkers; Magnetic resonance imaging; PSA; Prostatic neoplasms; Tumor volume

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31098818      PMCID: PMC8274954          DOI: 10.1007/s11255-019-02168-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  26 in total

Review 1.  Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American Urological Association Prostate Guidelines for Localized Prostate Cancer Update Panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Michael S Cookson; Gunnar Aus; Arthur L Burnett; Edith D Canby-Hagino; Anthony V D'Amico; Roger R Dmochowski; David T Eton; Jeffrey D Forman; S Larry Goldenberg; Javier Hernandez; Celestia S Higano; Stephen R Kraus; Judd W Moul; Catherine Tangen; J Brantley Thrasher; Ian Thompson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Improved decision making in intermediate-risk prostate cancer: a multicenter study on pathologic and oncologic outcomes after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jean Baptiste Beauval; Guillaume Ploussard; Bastien Cabarrou; Mathieu Roumiguié; Adil Ouzzane; Jérome Gas; Annabelle Goujon; Gautier Marcq; Romain Mathieu; Sébastien Vincendeau; Xavier Cathelineau; Pierre Mongiat-Artus; Laurent Salomon; Michel Soulié; Arnaud Méjean; Alexandre de La Taille; Morgan Rouprêt; François Rozet
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Impact of surgical margin status on prostate-cancer-specific mortality.

Authors:  Heather J Chalfin; Michael Dinizo; Bruce J Trock; Zhaoyong Feng; Alan W Partin; Patrick C Walsh; Elizabeth Humphreys; Misop Han
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging tumor volume with histopathology.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Haresh Mani; Omer Aras; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Vijay Shah; Marcelino Bernardo; Thomas Pohida; Dagane Daar; Compton Benjamin; Yolanda L McKinney; W Marston Linehan; Bradford J Wood; Maria J Merino; Peter L Choyke; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  The predictive value of endorectal 3 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extraprostatic extension in patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  D M Somford; E H Hamoen; J J Fütterer; J P van Basten; C A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; W Vreuls; I M van Oort; H Vergunst; L A Kiemeney; J O Barentsz; J A Witjes
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  The impact of positive surgical margins on mortality following radical prostatectomy during the prostate specific antigen era.

Authors:  Stephen A Boorjian; R Jeffrey Karnes; Paul L Crispen; Rachel E Carlson; Laureano J Rangel; Eric J Bergstralh; Michael L Blute
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Tumor volume improves the long-term prediction of biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer with positive surgical margins.

Authors:  Christian P Meyer; Jens Hansen; Katharina Boehm; Derya Tilki; Firas Abdollah; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Margit Fisch; Guido Sauter; Markus Graefen; Hartwig Huland; Felix K H Chun; Sascha A Ahyai
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Prediction of extraprostatic extension in men with biopsy Gleason score of 8 or greater.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Nakanishi; Patricia Troncoso; R Joseph Babaian
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-10-19       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Predictive value of negative 3T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate on 12-core biopsy results.

Authors:  James S Wysock; Neil Mendhiratta; Fabio Zattoni; Xiaosong Meng; Marc Bjurlin; William C Huang; Herbert Lepor; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Preoperative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Richard Ho; Mohummad M Siddiqui; Arvin K George; Thomas Frye; Amichai Kilchevsky; Michele Fascelli; Nabeel A Shakir; Raju Chelluri; Steven F Abboud; Annerleim Walton-Diaz; Sandeep Sankineni; Maria J Merino; Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Extraprostatic extension in prostate cancer: primer for radiologists.

Authors:  Alice C Shieh; Ezgi Guler; Vijayanadh Ojili; Raj Mohan Paspulati; Robin Elliott; Nikhil H Ramaiya; Sree Harsha Tirumani
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-12

2.  Percent tumor volume vs American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system subclassification for predicting biochemical recurrence in patients with pathologic T2 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Se Young Choi; Byung Hoon Chi; Bumjin Lim; Yoon Soo Kyung; Dalsan You; In Gab Jeong; Cheryn Song; Jun Hyuk Hong; Hanjong Ahn; Choung-Soo Kim
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  MRI Characteristics Accurately Predict Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Cécile Manceau; Jean-Baptiste Beauval; Marine Lesourd; Christophe Almeras; Richard Aziza; Jean-Romain Gautier; Guillaume Loison; Ambroise Salin; Christophe Tollon; Michel Soulié; Bernard Malavaud; Mathieu Roumiguié; Guillaume Ploussard
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 4.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.