Literature DB >> 31098802

Dataset for the reporting of prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy specimens: updated recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting.

James G Kench1, Meagan Judge2, Brett Delahunt3, Peter A Humphrey4, Glen Kristiansen5, Jon Oxley6, Krishan Rasiah7, Hiroyuki Takahashi8, Kiril Trpkov9, Murali Varma10, Thomas M Wheeler11, Ming Zhou12, John R Srigley13, Lars Egevad14.   

Abstract

The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) was formed in 2011 to harmonise the datasets, protocols and checklists for pathological reporting of various cancers and develop internationally agreed upon, evidence-based datasets. A dataset for prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens was developed in 2011-2012 as part of a pilot project; however, it required substantial revision following the ISUP Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading in 2014, the publication of the World Health Organisation (WHO) Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs in 2016, and the 8th edition of the Tumour-Node-Metastasis (TNM) staging system in late 2016. This article presents the up-to-date, evidence-based ICCR dataset and associated commentary for reporting prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens. PubMed and Google search engines were used to review the published literature on the subject, and the dataset was developed in line with the previously published ICCR framework for the development of cancer datasets. Substantial changes have been incorporated into the second edition of the ICCR prostate cancer (radical prostatectomy) dataset. These include revisions to prostate cancer grading, reporting of intraductal carcinoma of prostate and surgical margins, among others. Up-to-date cancer datasets underpin structured reporting and facilitate the production of consistent and accurate pathological data for patient care as well as comparisons between different cohorts and populations internationally.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Datasets; Pathology; Prostate cancer; Protocols

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31098802     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-019-02574-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  5 in total

1.  Digital versus light microscopy assessment of extraprostatic extension in radical prostatectomy samples.

Authors:  Metka Volavšek; Vanessa Henriques; Ana Blanca; Rodolfo Montironi; Liang Cheng; Maria R Raspollini; Alessia Cimadamore; Nuno Vau; Francesco Pierconti; Antonio Lopez-Beltran
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 2.  Intraoperative imaging in pathology-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Floris J Voskuil; Jasper Vonk; Bert van der Vegt; Schelto Kruijff; Vasilis Ntziachristos; Pieter J van der Zaag; Max J H Witjes; Gooitzen M van Dam
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 25.671

Review 3.  Quality checkpoints in the MRI-directed prostate cancer diagnostic pathway.

Authors:  Tristan Barrett; Maarten de Rooij; Francesco Giganti; Clare Allen; Jelle O Barentsz; Anwar R Padhani
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 16.430

4.  The prognostic role of histologic grade, worst pattern of invasion, and tumor budding in early oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma: a comparative study.

Authors:  Bin Xu; Abeer M Salama; Cristina Valero; Avery Yuan; Anjanie Khimraj; Maelle Saliba; Daniella K Zanoni; Ian Ganly; Snehal G Patel; Nora Katabi; Ronald Ghossein
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.535

5.  Clinical utility of subclassifying positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Shawn Dason; Emily A Vertosick; Kazuma Udo; Daniel D Sjoberg; Andrew J Vickers; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Ying-Bei Chen; Anuradha Gopalan; S Joseph Sirintrapun; Satish K Tickoo; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham; Victor E Reuter; Samson W Fine
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2021-07-11       Impact factor: 5.969

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.