| Literature DB >> 31098545 |
Joanna Lucy Bovis1, John Pradeep Edwin1, Chris Patrick Bano1, Athanasios Tyraskis1, Dinnish Baskaran1, Karthik Karuppaiah1.
Abstract
Our study assessed barriers to reporting adverse incidents (AIs). Adverse incident reporting (AIR), although it is a pillar of risk management, has a wide variation in staff perception and usage. A questionnaire was used in five NHS hospitals to assess 267 members of multidisciplinary team (MDT) staff usage of AIR. Thirty-three percent of staff had never reported an adverse incident (AI). Fourty-one percent of staff had missed opportunities to report AIs due to a poor response to previous reports. The group who missed opportunities had a significantly higher proportion of not having received feedback to their previous AI (p=0.03). In the group who had received training, 79% had submitted an AI. This was significantly higher than the group who had not received training (63%, p=0.02). Our study revealed that training and feedback following AIR are two major factors that could improve confidence in and use of AI reporting.Entities:
Keywords: Patient safety; clinical governance; duty of candour; safety culture
Year: 2018 PMID: 31098545 PMCID: PMC6502564 DOI: 10.7861/futurehosp.5-2-117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Future Healthc J ISSN: 2514-6645