Literature DB >> 31098465

Performing or not performing: what's in a target?

Julie Eatock1, Matthew Cooke2, Terry P Young1.   

Abstract

This paper analyses how providers have coped with the 4-hour target over the past 7 years. To do this, we used publicly available data from NHS Digital to track how long patients remain in accident and emergency (A&E) departments and their 'attendance disposal method'. Using this tool, we compared two A&E departments with similar arrival patterns and age profiles and that perform equally well against the target in a specific year. However, these hospitals exhibit very different underlying behaviour. Over 7 years, both exhibit a general increase in length of stay, increasing number of patients being admitted in the 20 minutes preceding the 4-hour target, and rising numbers of patients that breach the target. Despite the two hospitals having similar input profiles there is a 12 percentage point difference in the number of patients who leave the A&E department in the last 20 minutes. This operational information is not visible simply by monitoring the single existing metric. We conclude that the 4-hour target in isolation is an inadequate measure and we reflect on the difference between selecting measures for policy-level review, and for operational management. A link to download the graphs for each A&E in England is available.

Entities:  

Keywords:  4-hour target; A&E; analysis; hospital

Year:  2017        PMID: 31098465      PMCID: PMC6502571          DOI: 10.7861/futurehosp.4-3-167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Future Healthc J        ISSN: 2514-6645


  1 in total

1.  Determinants of time-to-disposition in patients who underwent CT for pulmonary embolism: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Ali Hassan; Omran Al Dandan; Khaled Awary; Besma Bukhamsin; Reema Bukhamseen; Alaa Alzaki; Amal Al-Sulaibeekh; Hind S Alsaif
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2021-10-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.