Houbao Qi1,2,3, Yuanyuan Li1,2,3, Huan Yun1,2,3, Tong Zhang4,5, Yugang Huang1,2,3, Jiang Zhou1,2,3, Hui Yan1,2,3, Jianmei Wei1,2,3, Yingquan Liu1,2,3, Zhiqian Zhang1,2,3, Yunhuan Gao1,2,3, Yongzhe Che2,3, Xiaomin Su1,2,3, Dashuai Zhu3, Yuan Zhang1,2,3, Jin Zhong4,5, Rongcun Yang1,2,3. 1. 1State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Nankai University, 300071 Tianjin, China. 2. 2Key Laboratory of Bioactive Materials Ministry of Education, Nankai University, 300071 Tianjin, China. 3. 3Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Nankai University, 300071 Tianjin, China. 4. 4State Key Laboratory of Microbial Resources, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101 Beijing, China. 5. 5School of Life Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100039 Beijing, China.
Abstract
Gut mucosal layers are crucial in maintaining the gut barrier function. Gut microbiota regulate homeostasis of gut mucosal layer via gut immune cells such as RORγt (+) IL-22(+) ILC3 cells, which can influence the proliferation of mucosal cells and the production of mucin. However, it is unclear how gut microbiota execute this regulation. Here we show that lactobacilli promote gut mucosal formation by producing L-Ornithine from arginine. L-Ornithine increases the level of aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand L-kynurenine produced from tryptophan metabolism in gut epithelial cells, which in turn increases RORγt (+)IL-22(+) ILC3 cells. Human REG3A transgenic mice show an increased proportion of L-Ornithine producing lactobacilli in the gut contents, suggesting that gut epithelial REG3A favors the expansion of L-Ornithine producing lactobacilli. Our study implicates the importance of a crosstalk between arginine metabolism in Lactobacilli and tryptophan metabolism in gut epithelial cells in maintaining gut barrier.
Gut mucosal layers are crucial in maintaining the gut barrier function. Gut microbiota regulate homeostasis of gut mucosal layer via gut immune cells such as RORγt (+) IL-22(+) ILC3 cells, which can influence the proliferation of mucosal cells and the production of mucin. However, it is unclear how gut microbiota execute this regulation. Here we show that lactobacilli promote gut mucosal formation by producing L-Ornithine from arginine. L-Ornithine increases the level of aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand L-kynurenine produced from tryptophan metabolism in gut epithelial cells, which in turn increases RORγt (+)IL-22(+) ILC3 cells. HumanREG3Atransgenic mice show an increased proportion of L-Ornithine producing lactobacilli in the gut contents, suggesting that gut epithelial REG3A favors the expansion of L-Ornithine producing lactobacilli. Our study implicates the importance of a crosstalk between arginine metabolism in Lactobacilli and tryptophan metabolism in gut epithelial cells in maintaining gut barrier.
Gut mucus layers play a crucial barrier role in both separating the host from the noxious external environment and inhibiting the entrance of gut microbiota and/or their metabolites into the bloodstream and tissues[1]. The small intestine has one layer of unattached mucus to directly form a soluble mucus gel[2], which may act as a matrix to limit the contact of gut microbiota with gut cell surface[3]. The colonic mucus layer forms a physical barrier against bacteria and their metabolites[4]. Although gut mucus layers are vitally important for individual health, the mechanism(s) underlying the maintenance of gut mucosal homeostasis is not completely clear.Gut mucus layer consists of high-molecular-weight glycoproteins called mucin, that are synthesized and secreted by goblet cells. Goblet cells originate by their own mitosis or by differentiation of stem cells[5], which may be regulated by gut immune cells through the production of cytokines, such as IL-6[6] or direct cell–cell contact by activated macrophages[7]. IL-22 produced by innate lymphoid cells group 3 and other immune cells such as Th17, Th22, natural killer cells, γδ T cells, and lymphoid tissue inducer, can also promote the production of gut epithelial stem cells, which potentially increase mucus production through goblet cells[8,9]. These immune cell responses are dictated not only via “endogenous” host-derived but also “exogenous” signals, such as gut microbiota/their metabolites. Indeed, gut microbiota may not only regulate gut innate immune but also adaptive immune cells, such as that L. reuteri has a role in IL-22 production[10], and segmented filamentous bacteria may induce Th17 cells differentiation[11]. The products of bacteria may also interrupt T-cell differentiation, such as that polysaccharide A from Bacteroides fragilis promotes Treg cell secretion[12], and the lysates of polysaccharide-producing bacteria induce differentiation of Treg cells and IL-10 production[13]. Thus, the altered gut microbiota has direct or indirect effects on the gut immune cells.Interestingly, many secreted antimicrobial proteins in the gastrointestinal tract may potentially affect the composition of gut microbiota via killing bacteria, such as REG3[14]. Recent studies have shown that Reg3α contributes to resistance to DSS-mediated colitis with altered gut microbiota[15]. Thus, it is possible for gut antimicrobial proteins to be involved in gut mucosal homeostasis through the altered microbiota. We here found that gut antimicrobial protein REG3A may affect the composition of gut microbiota, typically increasing the proportion of Lactobacillus. We demonstrate that these increased Lactobacillus may promote gut mucus-layer homeostasis through producing L-Orn.
Results
REG3A promotes the formation of gut mucus layers
To investigate the effect(s) of gut microbiota on gut mucosal-layer homeostasis, we generated humanREG3Amice, which may affect the composition of gut microbiota. We found that mucus gel remarkably increased in the ileum of REG3Amice (Fig. 1a), in which humanREG3A (Gene ID: 5068) was selectively expressed in mouse intestinal Paneth cells under the control of the HD5 promoter[16] (Supplementary Fig. 1a, c, e). Higher levels of mucin 2 were also detected in the ileum of REG3Amice (Fig. 1b). Intestinal histological structures of REG3Amice exhibited increased goblet cells (Fig. 1c). The goblet cell markers Clca3 (Gob5), Retnlb (RELMβ), and Tff2 (trefoil factor 2) were upregulated in these REG3Amice (Fig. 1d). Ki67 cells in the intestinal crypt also remarkably increased in REG3Amice (Fig. 1e). The cell-cycle checkpoint molecules Cdkn1a (p21) and Cdkn2d (p19) were downregulated in these epithelial cells (Fig. 1e). Meanwhile, increased crypt height, including the transit-amplifying compartment, which indicates high proliferative activity, was also observed in these humanREG3Amice (Fig. 1f). Interestingly, mucus layers in the proximal colon tissues of REG3Amice were also markedly thicker, as compared with their control cohoused littermates (Fig. 1g). The thickened mucus layer in the colon tissues may be derived from the expression of REG3A in colon Paneth cell-like cells[17] and/or the secreted REG3A by intestinal Paneth cells. Higher levels of mucin 2 were detected in proximal colon tissues of humanREG3Amice (Fig. 1h). Ki67 cells in the colon crypt also remarkably increased in these REG3Amice (Fig. 1i). The Cdkn1a (p21) and Cdkn2d (p19) were downregulated in the colonic epithelial cells (Fig. 1i). The REG3Amice also conferred a marked resistance to DSS-mediated colitis (Fig. 1i–n). Levels of serum LPS were lower in DSS-treated humanREG3Amice (Fig. 1o). The bacterium numbers in the organs and tissues, such as the spleen of DSS-treated REG3Amice, were much less than wt control littermates (Fig. 1p). Furthermore, there had been much more goblet cells and Ki67 cells with upregulated Clca3, Retnlb, and Tff2 and downregulated Cdkn1a and Cdkn2d in the colon crypt of DSS-treated humanREG3Amice (Supplementary Fig. 2a–d). Taken together, these data indicate that REG3A is involved in the maintenance of gut mucosal homeostasis through modulating gut epithelial regeneration and repair.
Fig. 1
Gut human REG3A promotes the formation of gut mucus layers. a Fluorescence in situ hybridization of 16S rRNA and immunostaining of mucin in the ileum of human REG3A mice (REG3A) and control cohoused littermate wt mice (ten slides/mouse; n = 6). b qRT-PCR of mucin 2 (MUC2) in the ileum of human REG3A and control cohoused littermate wt mice (n = 6). c Staining of goblet cells in the ileum of control cohoused littermate wt and human REG3A mice. Ten slides/mouse, n = 6; VCU, villus-crypt units. d QRT-PCR of Clca3, REtnlb, and Tff2 (n = 6). e Staining of Ki67 cells (ten slides/mouse, n = 6) and qRT-PCR of Cdknla and Cdkn2d (n = 6). f Crypt and transit-amplifying (TA) heights in the ileum of wt and human REG3A mice. Eighty wt (WT) versus 86 human REG3A tg (REG3A) transit-amplifying compartments; ten slides/mouse, n = 6. g Fluorescence in situ hybridization of 16S rRNA and immunostaining of mucin in the proximal colon of human REG3A mice (REG3A) and control cohoused littermate wt mice (ten slides/mouse; n = 6). h QRT-PCR of mucin 2 (MUC2) in the colon tissues (n = 6). i Staining of Ki67 cells in the colon (ten slides/mouse, n = 6) and qRT-PCR of Cdknla and Cdkn2d (n = 6). j, k Survival rate (j), body weight, and the disease activity index (DAI) (k) after DSS (n = 18). l Length of colon tissue. m QRT-PCR of TNFα, IL1®, and IL-6 in the colon tissues after DSS (n = 6). n Hematoxylin/eosin staining and histological scores of distal colon samples after DSS. Scale bars = 40 µm. o LPS in the peripheral sera of REG3A and control cohoused littermate wt mice after DSS (n = 6). p Bacterium clones in the spleen after DSS (n = 6). Student’s t test, mean ± SD in b, d, and e (RE), h, i (RE), and l, m, o, and p, mean ± SEM in e (ki67 cell), f, g, and i the Mann–Whitney U test in c and n; Wilcoxon’s test in j; analysis of variance test in k; NS no significance; RE relative expression. Data are representative of three independent experiments. Also see Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2
Gut humanREG3A promotes the formation of gut mucus layers. a Fluorescence in situ hybridization of 16S rRNA and immunostaining of mucin in the ileum of humanREG3Amice (REG3A) and control cohoused littermate wt mice (ten slides/mouse; n = 6). b qRT-PCR of mucin 2 (MUC2) in the ileum of humanREG3A and control cohoused littermate wt mice (n = 6). c Staining of goblet cells in the ileum of control cohoused littermate wt and humanREG3Amice. Ten slides/mouse, n = 6; VCU, villus-crypt units. d QRT-PCR of Clca3, REtnlb, and Tff2 (n = 6). e Staining of Ki67 cells (ten slides/mouse, n = 6) and qRT-PCR of Cdknla and Cdkn2d (n = 6). f Crypt and transit-amplifying (TA) heights in the ileum of wt and humanREG3Amice. Eighty wt (WT) versus 86 humanREG3A tg (REG3A) transit-amplifying compartments; ten slides/mouse, n = 6. g Fluorescence in situ hybridization of 16S rRNA and immunostaining of mucin in the proximal colon of humanREG3Amice (REG3A) and control cohoused littermate wt mice (ten slides/mouse; n = 6). h QRT-PCR of mucin 2 (MUC2) in the colon tissues (n = 6). i Staining of Ki67 cells in the colon (ten slides/mouse, n = 6) and qRT-PCR of Cdknla and Cdkn2d (n = 6). j, k Survival rate (j), body weight, and the disease activity index (DAI) (k) after DSS (n = 18). l Length of colon tissue. m QRT-PCR of TNFα, IL1®, and IL-6 in the colon tissues after DSS (n = 6). n Hematoxylin/eosin staining and histological scores of distal colon samples after DSS. Scale bars = 40 µm. o LPS in the peripheral sera of REG3A and control cohoused littermate wt mice after DSS (n = 6). p Bacterium clones in the spleen after DSS (n = 6). Student’s t test, mean ± SD in b, d, and e (RE), h, i (RE), and l, m, o, and p, mean ± SEM in e (ki67 cell), f, g, and i the Mann–Whitney U test in c and n; Wilcoxon’s test in j; analysis of variance test in k; NS no significance; RE relative expression. Data are representative of three independent experiments. Also see Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2
REG3A-mediated formation of gut mucus layers is dependent on ILC3
Gut immune cells may influence mucosal cell proliferation through the direct cell–cell contact or the production of cytokines, such as IL-22[9,18]. We thus assessed IL-22-associated gut immune cell population and subpopulations according to the described gated strategy (Supplementary Fig. 3). IL-22(+) cells include innate lymphocyte cell 3 (ILC3), CD4(+)Th17, and CD4(+)Th22 cells in gut tissues[19]. We found that the increased IL-22(+) cells in humanREG3Amice mainly belonged to CD4(–) IL-22(+) cells but not CD4(+)IL17(+) (Fig. 2a), implying that these cells may be ILC3 cells. ILC3 cells are RORγt-positive cells and constitute at least two bona fide subsets NCR(+) ILC3 expressing NKp46 and LTi-like ILC3, which includes CD4(+) and CD4(–) subsets[20,21]. The increased ILC3 cells in the ileum and colon of humanREG3Amice were CD45(+)lin(–)RORγt(+) IL-22(+)NKp46(–) CD4(–) ILC3 cells (Fig. 2b, c), which may strongly produce IL-22[22]. Increased CD45(+)lin(–)RORγt(+) IL-22(+)NKp46(–) CD4(–) ILC3 cells were also found in Reg3α adenovirus-injected mice (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Fig. 1b, d, f). Higher levels of IL-22 in the ileum and colon tissues were detected in REG3Amice and Reg3α/adenovirus- injected mice (Fig. 2e). All of these imply that CD45(+)lin(–)RORγt (+) IL-22(+)NKp46(–) CD4(–) ILC3 cells may be involved in REG3A/Reg3α-mediated formation of gut mucus layers. To further confirm the role of IL-22 in REG3A-mediated gut mucus layers, we treated REG3Amice by injecting IL-22-neutralizing antibodies. Reduced mucus gel in the ileum tissues and thinned mucus layers in the colon tissues of REG3Amice were observed after administering IL-22-neutralizing antibodies (Fig. 2f, g), indicating that REG3A-mediated mucus layers were dependent on IL-22. In addition, the proportion of CD11C(+)CD103(+)CD11B(+) dendritic cells, CD11B(+)Ly6C(+) myeloid-derived monocytes, and CD11B(+)F4/80(+) macrophages, which may be promoted by GM-CSF from RORγt(+)IL-22(+) ILC3 cells, also increased (Supplementary Fig. 4). Taken together, gut REG3A (Reg3α in mouse) promotes the formation of gut mucus layers in the small intestine and colon through RORγt (+) IL-22(+) ILC3 cells.
We next investigated whether the accumulation of CD45(+)lin(–)RORγt (+) IL-22(+)NKp46(–) CD4(–) ILC3 cells in humanREG3Amice is dependent on the altered microbiota. We performed the transplantation experiment of REG3A-shaped microbiota in pan-antibiotic-treated WT mice. More RORγt(+)IL-22(+) cells increased mucus gel in the ileum, thickened mucus layers in the colon tissues, and increased goblet cells and Ki67 cells in the gut tissues were observed in REG3Atg feces- transplanted mice (Supplementary Fig. 5). We next analyzed the composition of gut microbiota and found that the proportion of lactobacilli was high in the ileum and colon of humanREG3Amice, as compared with their control cohoused littermates (Fig. 3a–e). Although mouse Reg3 may kill some Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-positive lactobacilli are not sensitive to Reg3[14,23]. We further analyzed the composition of lactobacilli via in vitro culture and sequencing analyses, and found that increased lactobacillus in humanREG3Amice was close to L. murinus isolates, which was named as L. NK2 (Fig. 3c, d and Supplementary Fig. 6a, b). We next employed germ-free (GF) mice to examine the effects of L. NK2 strain on RORγt (+) IL-22(+) ILC3 cells and formation of gut mucus layers (Supplementary Fig. 6c). Infusion of L. NK2 caused increased mucus and accumulation of RORγt (+) IL-22(+) ILC3 cells (Fig. 3f, g). Non-transplanted control GF mice housed under separated but similar conditions had less RORγt(+)IL-22(+) cells (Fig. 3f, g), consistent with previous data in GF mice[24,25]. Moreover, the effect of lactobacillus is bacteria-species specific. L. NK2 strain than L. NK1 strain, which is homologous with L. taiwaness isolate[23], caused more remarkable accumulation of RORγt(+)IL-22(+) cells in GF mice (Fig. 3f, g). Increased mucus gel in the ileum, thickened mucus layers in the colon tissues, and increased goblet cells and Ki67 cells in the gut tissues were also observed in L. NK2 strain- transplanted GF mice (Fig. 3h, i and Supplementary Fig. 6d–f). The increased RORγt (+) IL-22(+) cells, thickened gut mucus, and increased Ki67 cells were also not found in germ-free REG3A tg mice (Fig. 3j–m). Thus, we demonstrate that lactobacillus L. NK2 alone promotes the accumulation of RORγt (+) IL-22(+) in gut tissues.
REG3A-associated lactobacillus promotes production of L-Kyn in gut epithelial cells. a Microarray of the ileum epithelial cells in REG3A-associated lactobacillus-colonized GF mice (GF/L.NK2) and control uncolonized GF mice (n = 6). b Metabolism map of tryptophan in mouse gut epithelial cells. c QRT-PCR and immunoblotting of IDO1 in the ileum tissues of L. NK2 or L. NK1-colonized GF mice and control uncolonized GF mice. SPF, wt mice raised in SPF environment. d Immunostaining of IDO1 in the ileum tissues of REG3A-associated lactobacillus-colonized GF mice and control GF mice (representative image, n = 6). e L-Kyn ELISA of the ileum (left) and colon (right) epithelial cells of REG3A-associated lactobacillus-colonized GF mice and control GF mice (n = 6). f L-Kyn ELISA of the ileum (left) and colon (right) epithelial cells of human REG3A
mice and their control littermates (n = 6). g, h QRT-PCR (g) and immunoblotting (h) of IDO1 in the ileum or colon epithelial cells of human REG3A mice and their control littermates. i Immunostaining of p-Src in the ileum epithelial cells of human REG3A mice and their control littermates. j, k Flow cytometry of CD45(+)RORγt(+)IL-22(+) and their subsets in the ileum (j) and colon (k) LP of mice with or without L-Kyn infusion. Scale bars = 40 µm; Student’s t test was used in f, g, j, and k. ANOVA plus post-Bonferroni analysis in c, d, and e; NS no significance; RE relative expression. In h and i, different individuals were indicated
REG3A-associated lactobacillus promotes production of L-Kyn in gut epithelial cells. a Microarray of the ileum epithelial cells in REG3A-associated lactobacillus-colonized GF mice (GF/L.NK2) and control uncolonized GF mice (n = 6). b Metabolism map of tryptophan in mouse gut epithelial cells. c QRT-PCR and immunoblotting of IDO1 in the ileum tissues of L. NK2 or L. NK1-colonized GF mice and control uncolonized GF mice. SPF, wt mice raised in SPF environment. d Immunostaining of IDO1 in the ileum tissues of REG3A-associated lactobacillus-colonized GF mice and control GF mice (representative image, n = 6). e L-Kyn ELISA of the ileum (left) and colon (right) epithelial cells of REG3A-associated lactobacillus-colonized GF mice and control GF mice (n = 6). f L-Kyn ELISA of the ileum (left) and colon (right) epithelial cells of humanREG3Amice and their control littermates (n = 6). g, h QRT-PCR (g) and immunoblotting (h) of IDO1 in the ileum or colon epithelial cells of humanREG3Amice and their control littermates. i Immunostaining of p-Src in the ileum epithelial cells of humanREG3Amice and their control littermates. j, k Flow cytometry of CD45(+)RORγt(+)IL-22(+) and their subsets in the ileum (j) and colon (k) LP of mice with or without L-Kyn infusion. Scale bars = 40 µm; Student’s t test was used in f, g, j, and k. ANOVA plus post-Bonferroni analysis in c, d, and e; NS no significance; RE relative expression. In h and i, different individuals were indicated
Lactobacillus-derived L-Orn is a critical factor for ILC3
Lactobacillus-derived L-Orn promotes the production of AhR ligand L-Kyn in gut epithelial cells. a Immunostaining of IDO1 in the ileum after L-Orn administration in wt mice or L-Orn inhibitor DFMO administration in human REG3A mice. b HPLC/MASS of L-Kyn in the ileum epithelial cells after administrating L-Orn or L-Orn inhibitor DFMO (n = 6). c, d Flow cytometry of RORγt (+) IL-22(+) cells in the ileum (c) and colon (d) of mice after administering L-Orn or L-Orn inhibitor DFMO. e Flow cytometry of RORγt (+) IL-22(+) cells in the ileum and colon of IDO-1 KO with or withour L-Orn. f Immunostaining and qRT-PCR of mucin in the ileum of mice after administering L-Orn or L-Orn inhibitor DFMO (ten slides/mouse, n = 6). g Staining of Ki67 cells in the ileum of mice after administering L-Orn or L-Orn inhibitor DFMO (ten slides/mouse, n = 6). h Immunostaining of mucin in the colon of mice after administering L-Orn or L-Orn inhibitor DFMO (ten slides/mouse, n = 6). WT, wild-type mice; WT/Orn, L-Orn-fed mice; REG3A, human REG3A mice; REG3A/DFMO, L-Orn inhibitor DFMO-fed mice. IDO-1 KO/L-Orn, L-Orn-fed IDO-1 KO mice. Scale bars = 40 µm; Student’s t test, mean ± SD in e; ANOVA plus post-Bonferroni analysis in a, b, c, d, f, g, and h; NS no significance; RE, relative expression. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments. Also see Supplementary Fig. 7
Lactobacillus-derived L-Orn promotes the production of AhR ligand L-Kyn in gut epithelial cells. a Immunostaining of IDO1 in the ileum after L-Orn administration in wt mice or L-Orn inhibitor DFMO administration in humanREG3Amice. b HPLC/MASS of L-Kyn in the ileum epithelial cells after administrating L-Orn or L-Orn inhibitor DFMO (n = 6). c, d Flow cytometry of RORγt (+) IL-22(+) cells in the ileum (c) and colon (d) of mice after administering L-Orn or L-Orn inhibitor DFMO. e Flow cytometry of RORγt (+) IL-22(+) cells in the ileum and colon of IDO-1 KO with or withour L-Orn. f Immunostaining and qRT-PCR of mucin in the ileum of mice after administering L-Orn or L-Orn inhibitor DFMO (ten slides/mouse, n = 6). g Staining of Ki67 cells in the ileum of mice after administering L-Orn or L-Orn inhibitor DFMO (ten slides/mouse, n = 6). h Immunostaining of mucin in the colon of mice after administering L-Orn or L-Orn inhibitor DFMO (ten slides/mouse, n = 6). WT, wild-type mice; WT/Orn, L-Orn-fed mice; REG3A, humanREG3Amice; REG3A/DFMO, L-Orn inhibitor DFMO-fed mice. IDO-1 KO/L-Orn, L-Orn-fed IDO-1 KO mice. Scale bars = 40 µm; Student’s t test, mean ± SD in e; ANOVA plus post-Bonferroni analysis in a, b, c, d, f, g, and h; NS no significance; RE, relative expression. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments. Also see Supplementary Fig. 7
L-OCT deficiency impedes the effect of lactobacillus
L-Orn may be derived from Arg metabolism through the ADI pathway in lactobacillus (Supplementary Fig. 9a)[31]. Indeed, L. NK2 produced L-Orn through Arg metabolism, but L. NK2 and L. reuteri more effectively used Arg to produce L-Orn than L. NK1 (Supplementary Fig. 9b). The ADI pathway comprises three reactions catalyzed by Arg deminase (ADI; EC3.5.3.6), ornithine carbamoyl-transferase (OCT: EC2.1.3.3), and carbamate kinase (CK: EC 2.7.2.2), leading to the conversion of Arg into ornithine (Supplementary Fig. 9a)[31]. We prepared L. reuteriΔOCT but failed to generate L. NK2ΔOCT. The generated L. reuteriΔOCT did not produce L-Orn in vitro in the presence of Arg (Supplementary Fig. 9b). OCT deficiency affected the concentration of L-Kyn not only in the ileum but also in the colon epithelial tissues (Supplementary Fig. 9c). The levels of both IDO1 and p-Src in the gut epithelial cells of OCT-deficient lactobacillus-colonized mice were lower (Supplementary Fig. 9d–f). The proportion of CD45(+) RORγt(+)IL-22(+)lin(–)NKp46(–)CD4(–) ILC3 cells, decreased mucus gel, thinner mucus layers, and reduced mucin 2 were also observed in these OCT-deficient lactobacillus-colonized mice (Supplementary Fig. 9g–i). L. reuteri also produced the AhR ligand indole-3-aldehyde[10]. But no differences were detected in L-Kyn in the gut content between wild-type L. reuteri and OCT-deficient L. reuteri. Higher levels of L-Orn could be detected in L. reuteri and L.NK2-infused mice (Supplementary Fig. 9j). Both L. reuteri and OCT- deficient L. reuteri had a similar proliferative ability (Supplementary Fig. 9k).Since L.NK2 promotes the homeostasis of not only the small intestine but also the colon, we employed DSS- mediated colitic model to assess the physiological function of lactobacillus-derived L-Orn in resisting DSS- mediated colitis. L-Orn administration promoted resistance of wt mice to DSS-induced colitis; whereas L-Orn inhibitor decreased the resistance of humanREG3A to DSS-mediated colitis (Fig. 6a–g and Supplementary Fig. 10a, b, e, f). The levels of serum LPS were lower and the numbers of bacterium clones in the spleen were less in L-Orn-administered mice (Supplementary Fig. 10c, d); whereas there were higher levels of serum LPS and the more bacterium clones in L-Orn inhibitor administered humanREG3Amice after giving DSS (Supplementary Fig. 10g, h). OCT-deficient lactobacillus, which did not produce L-Orn, reduced the resistance of mice to DSS-mediated colitis (Fig. 6i–k and Supplementary Fig. 10i, j). Similar effectiveness was also observed in L. NK2-transplanted mice, which were administered using L-Orn inhibitor DFMO (Fig. 6l–n and Supplementary Fig. 10m, n). They also had higher levels of serum LPS and the more bacteria in the spleen of OCT-deficient lactobacillus-infused mice and also in L. NK2 transplantation with L-Orn inhibitor- treated mice after giving DSS (Supplementary Fig. 10k, l, o, p). These results demonstrate that lactobacillus- derived L-Orn plays a critical role in maintaining gut mucosal homeostasis.
Fig. 6
Lactobacillus-derived L-Orn promotes resistance to DSS-mediated colitis. a Experimental design for B–G. b, c, Survival rate (b) and body weight and the disease activity score (c) were monitored after the start of DSS. Wild-type (WT) mice with (L-Orn) or without (Vehicle) administration of L-Orn (n = 18, male). d Length of colon tissue in wild-type mice with or without administration of L-Orn. Mice were killed on day 7 after the start of DSS and colon length was measured. e, f, Survival rate (e) and body weight and the disease activity index (f) were monitored after the start of DSS. Human REG3A
mice with (REG3a/DFMO) or without (REG3A/Vehicle) administration of DFMO (n = 18, male) mice. g Length of colon tissue in human REG3A
mice with or without administration of DFMO mice. Mice were killed on day 7 after the start of DSS and colon length was measured. h Experimental design for i–n. i, j, Survival rate (i) and body weight and the disease activity score (j) were monitored after the start of DSS. Mice were infused with L. reuteri or L. reuteri/ΔOCT (n = 18, male). k Length of colon tissue in mice after infusing L. reuteri or L. reuteri/ΔOCT. Mice were killed on day 7 after the start of DSS and colon length was measured. l, m, Survival rate (l) and body weight and the disease activity score (m) were monitored after the start of DSS. Mice were infused with or L. NK2 with DFMO (n = 18, male) mice. n Length of colon tissue in mice after infusing L. NK2 or L. NK2 with DFMO. Mice were killed on day 7 after the start of DSS and colon length was measured. Wilcoxon’s test in b, e, i, and l; analysis of variance test in c, f, j, and m; Student’s t test in d, g, k, and n; NS no significance; RE relative expression. Data are representative of three independent experiments. Also see Supplementary Fig. 9
Lactobacillus-derived L-Orn promotes resistance to DSS-mediated colitis. a Experimental design for B–G. b, c, Survival rate (b) and body weight and the disease activity score (c) were monitored after the start of DSS. Wild-type (WT) mice with (L-Orn) or without (Vehicle) administration of L-Orn (n = 18, male). d Length of colon tissue in wild-type mice with or without administration of L-Orn. Mice were killed on day 7 after the start of DSS and colon length was measured. e, f, Survival rate (e) and body weight and the disease activity index (f) were monitored after the start of DSS. HumanREG3Amice with (REG3a/DFMO) or without (REG3A/Vehicle) administration of DFMO (n = 18, male) mice. g Length of colon tissue in humanREG3Amice with or without administration of DFMOmice. Mice were killed on day 7 after the start of DSS and colon length was measured. h Experimental design for i–n. i, j, Survival rate (i) and body weight and the disease activity score (j) were monitored after the start of DSS. Mice were infused with L. reuteri or L. reuteri/ΔOCT (n = 18, male). k Length of colon tissue in mice after infusing L. reuteri or L. reuteri/ΔOCT. Mice were killed on day 7 after the start of DSS and colon length was measured. l, m, Survival rate (l) and body weight and the disease activity score (m) were monitored after the start of DSS. Mice were infused with or L. NK2 with DFMO (n = 18, male) mice. n Length of colon tissue in mice after infusing L. NK2 or L. NK2 with DFMO. Mice were killed on day 7 after the start of DSS and colon length was measured. Wilcoxon’s test in b, e, i, and l; analysis of variance test in c, f, j, and m; Student’s t test in d, g, k, and n; NS no significance; RE relative expression. Data are representative of three independent experiments. Also see Supplementary Fig. 9
Discussion
We found that lactobacillus may promote the homeostasis of gut mucus layer through producing L-Orn. L-Orn stimulates Trp metabolism to produce AhR ligands in gut epithelial cells, which induce accumulation of RORγt (+) IL-22(+) ILC3 in gut tissues. We demonstrate that the proportion of L-Orn-producing lactobacilli in the gut contents may be regulated by gut epithelial REG3A. Thus, there exists a gut epithelial REG3A—lactobacillus-derived L-Orn—L-Kyn in gut epithelial cells—RORγt (+) IL-22(+) ILC3 immune cell axis to maintain gut mucosal homeostasis. Our data improve understanding of the mechanism of gut mucosal homeostasis. Since the gut mucosal homeostasis plays a critical role in human diseases such as colitis and metabolism-associated diseases, our findings also offer insight for prevention and treatment of these diseases.We demonstrate that lactobacillus-derived L-Orn may upregulate IDO1 in gut epithelial cells to produce AhR ligand L-Kyn. AhR ligands that drive the differentiation of ILC3 immune cells may be entirely derived from the endogenous ligands, such as the Trp metabolites L-Kyn[24,27]. Several cell types, including specific subsets of dendritic cells (DCs), macrophages, and immature monocytes, express increased levels of IDO1, which may promote the AhR ligand production in response to inflammatory cues, such as interferon γ (IFNγ) or signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3)-activity stimuli[32], and CpG oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs)[32]. However, our data exhibit that gut epithelial cells also produce AhR ligand L-Kyn by L-Orn through upregulating IDO1. Previous studies show that IDO1-positive staining may be primarily detected within the interstitial space of the villi or mucosal layer[33]. IDO1 expression at mucosal sites may be modulated during immune activation[33]. Recent studies also reveal that L-Orn may upregulate IDO1 in the macrophages and DCs[29].Lactobacillus may produce L-Orn through arginine (Arg) metabolisms. Others also reported that lactobacillus could produce L-Orn[30,34]. Interestingly, Arg has been found to preserve intestinal barrier integrity in animals after intestinal obstruction[35] and dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) colitis. It has also been established that Arg may improve the migration of epithelial cells, increase villus height and crypt depth, and decrease cell apoptosis in methotrexate (MTX)-induced mucositis and DSS colitis[35]. Long-term increased polyamine (L-Orn metabolites) intake elevated blood spermine levels and inhibited aging-associated pathologies in mice and humans[36]. Since L-Orn from lactobacillus through Arg metabolism may promote gut mucus homeostasis, our results expand understanding of the mechanism by which Arg contributes to this homeostasis. Others also found that some lactobacilli, such as L. reuteri, have an effect on IL-22 production by producing indole-3-aldehyde[10]. Thus, multiple lactobacillus strains or multiple effects of one lactobacillus strain are involved in the regulation of RORγt (+)IL-22(+) ILC3 cells through different mechanisms. However, previous reports showed that REG3α could produce cytotoxity to Gram + bacteria. This may be that Lactobacillus is different from other Gram+ bacteria. It is possible that the cytotoxity of REG3 to other Gram+ bacteria may affect proliferation and growth of lactobacilli. There also exist increased Gram-positive lactobacilli in other Reg
mice[14,23].
Methods
Mice
Four- to six-week-old male or female C57BL/6 mice were obtained from Nanjing Animal Center. IDO-1–/– mice were from Nanjing Animal Center. All experimental litters were bred and maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions in the Animal Center of Nankai University. Experiments were carried out using age- and gender-matched mice. All procedures were conducted according to the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Model Animal Research Center. Animal experiments were approved by the Institute’s Animal Ethics Committee of Nankai University. All experimental variables such as husbandry, parental genotypes, and environmental influences were carefully controlled. C57BL/6 germ-free (GF) mice were generated by Shanghai SLAC Laboratory Animal Co. LID. All experiments in GF mice were performed in Shanghai SLAC Laboratory Animal Co. LID. HumanREG3Atransgenic mice (humanREG3A) mice were prepared by Nanjing Animal Center. HD5 promoter, which may specifically promote the REG3A expression in gut Paneth cells, was conjugated into Pinsulator–pHD5-promoter–CDS–polyplasmid. The fragments of REG3A–CDS and polyA were cloned into HD5 promoter–Pinsulator. This conjugation was demonstrated using primers (M13F: GCCAGGGTTTTCCCAGTCACGA and HD5-REG3A-tR: GTAGGGTATGATGTGACGTTTG) and sequencing using the primers (HD5-tR:CAGCATGGTGGTACATGCCT and CDS-tF: GGCAACATATGCCCATATGC). HumanREG3Amice were identified using the following primers (REG3A-tF3: GAGCCCAATGGAGAAGGTTGG and REG3A -tR3:GTCCTTCCGAGTGAGAGACAC, which produced a 323-bp band in tg mice and no band in wt mice). According to this method, mice were identified as humanREG3A-positive mice (humanREG3A) and humanREG3A-negative mice (wt). HumanREG3Amice or wt siblings were from a cross between wt mice and humanREG3Amice (heterozygous mice). The mice were from different mothers.For preparation of mouse Reg3α/adenovirus-injected mice, mouse Reg3α adenoviruses (Reg3α/Ad) were first prepared by ABM, Canada and expanded by JIKAI, China, and then ip injected into mice according to the indicated time (1 × 109 viral particles/mouse). Control empty adenoviruses (NC/Ad, 1 × 109 control viral particles) were from ABM, Canada.
Mouse models
For DSS-induced colitis, dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced colitis was performed according to the previous method[37]. Briefly, mice received 2.5% (wt/vol) DSS (40,000 kDa; ICN Biochemicals) or indicated doses in their drinking water for 7 days, and then switched to regular drinking water. The amount of DSSwater drank per animal was recorded and no differences in intake between strains were observed. For survival studies, mice were followed for 14 days post start of DSS treatment. Mice were weighed every other day for the determination of percent weight change. This was calculated as % weight change = (weight at day X–day 0/weight at day 0) × 100. Diarrhea was scored daily as follows: 0, normal; 2, loose stools; 4, watery diarrhea. Blood in stool was scored as follows: 0, normal; 2, slight bleeding; 4, gross bleeding. Weight loss was scored as follows: 0, none; 1, 1–5%; 2, 5–10%; 3, 10–15%; 4, >15%. Disease activity index was the average of these scores: (combined score of stool consistency, bleeding, and weight loss)/3[38]. Mice were killed at the indicated days for histological study. Representative colon tissues were embedded in paraffin for hematoxylin/eosin (H&E) staining or embedded in OCT compound (Tissue-Tek, Sakura, Torrance, CA) and frozen over liquid nitrogen for immunostaining. For histological evaluation, colonic epithelial damage was scored blindly as follows: 0, normal; 1, hyperproliferation, irregular crypts, and goblet cell loss; 2, mild-to-moderate crypt loss (10–50%); 3, severe crypt loss (50–90%); 4, complete crypt loss, surface epithelium intact; 5, small-to-medium-sized ulcer (<10 crypt widths); 6, large ulcer (>10 crypt widths)[39].For microbiota transplantation, germ-free mice were orally administered 200 □l of lactobacillus (1 × 109 bacteria, once/week). In wt mice, mice were first treated with ampicillin (A, 1 g/L, Sigma), vancomycin (V, 0.5 g/L), neomycin sulfate (N, 1 g/L), and metronidazole (M, 1 g/L) via the drinking water for 2 weeks. To confirm the elimination of bacteria, stools were collected from antibiotic-treated and untreated mice and cultured in anaerobic and aerobic conditions. Mice were orally administered 200 □l of fecal suspension or 1 × 109 bacteria (once/week).For L-kynurenine (L-Kyn) administration, mice were randomly assigned to two different treatment groups (n = 6/group). L-kynurenine sulfate (300 mg/kg, i.p.) or vehicle (0.1 M PBS buffer) of the same volume (0.2 ml) was administered intraperitoneally[40].For L-Orn or eflornithine (DFMO) infusion, mice were randomly assigned to two different treatment groups (n = 6/group), and then mice were administered in drinking distilled H2O for 14 days. The mean L-Orn consumption of mice was ∼3.3 g/kg/d[41]. Eflornithine (DFMO) (MedChem Express) was administered as a 1% solution in drinking distilled H2O to mice for 14 days[42]. The mean DFMO consumption of mice was ∼1.5 g/kg/d. Mice fed with H2O without L-Orn or DFMO were used as control.
Gut microbiota analysis
Gut microbiota was analyzed according to our previously reported method[23]. Briefly, gut microbiota were analyzed by Majorbio Biotechnology Company (Shanghai, China) using primers that target to the V3–V4 regions of 16S rRNA. Operational Taxonomic Unit (OTU) analysis was performed as follows: sequences were processed (trimmed) using the Mothur software and subsequently clustered at 97% sequence identity using cd-hit to generate OTUs. The OTU memberships of the sequences were used to construct a sample–OTU count matrix. The samples were clustered at genus and OTU levels using the sample–genus and sample–OTU count matrices, respectively. For each clustering, Morisita–Horn dissimilarity was used to compute a sample distance matrix from the initial count matrix, and the distance matrix was subsequently used to generate a hierarchical clustering using Ward’s minimum variance method. For the absolute numbers of gut lactobacilli, 16Ss rRNAs were extracted, and then amplified using strain-specific primers. The concentration of each product was detected and then exchanged into copy numbers. Standard curves were prepared from serial dilution of Lactobacillus genomic 16S rRNAs. Primers used were listed in Supplementary Table 1.
Lactobacillus isolation and culture
Lactobacillus isolation and culture were performed according to previous method[23]. In brief, 100 mg of fresh fecal samples were collected and diluted in 2 ml of BPS solution, and cultured on Rogosa SL selective medium (Sigma-Aldrich) for lactobacillus enumeration, and then colonies were identified and purified using 16S rRNA sequence analyses. Lactobacilli were cultured in deMan, Rogosa, Sharpe (MRS; 3 M Health Care, St. Paul, MN) media and also grown on MRS agar containing 10% sucrose. Anaerobic conditions were generated with the sachets of AnaeroPack-Anaero (Mitsubishi Gas Chemical, Japan) in an airtight jar. After 24 h of cultivation in liquid media, lactobacilli could reach 1 × 109 CFU/ml.For L-Orn production by lactobacillus in vitro, lactobacilli were propagated routinely for 24 h at 37 °C in MRS broth medium. Before using to assay arginine catabolism, cells were first subcultured (37 °C for 24 h) on MRS agar. Monoclonal lactobacillus was newly propagated in MRS broth with or without 6 mM arginine, which was then used to induce arginine catabolism. The supernatants were collected at the indicated time and L-ornithine was analyzed using ELISA.
Construction of OCT-deficient lactobacillus
Ornithine carbamoyltransferase (OCT) nucleotide sequences of L. reuteri DSM 20016 (NCBI GI 148530277, Lreu_0044) and JCM 1112 (NCBI GI 183223999, LAR_0041) were used for identifying a homologous gene in the genome of L. reuteri ATCC PTA 4659. The locus of the gene encoding the OCT and flanking nucleotide sequences in L. reuteri ATCC PTA 4659 were analyzed with the BLAST program against the NCBI databases (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast. cgi). The gene coding for OCT in L. reuteri ATCC PTA 4659 was truncated according to the following method. To construct a ΔOCT (ornithine carbamoyltransferase) deletion mutant inserted with chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (cat, Cm), the upstream chromosomal DNA fragment (896 bp) and the downstream chromosomal DNA fragment (949 bp) and the cat gene were amplified with the Left-F/Left-R, Right-F/Right-R, and Cat-F/Cat-R primers. The vector pMG36e fragment was amplified by 36e-F/36e-R primers. Then the four PCR products were gel purified, ligated by the one-step cloning kit, and transformed into E. coli DH5α. The recombinant plasmid pMG36e-left-cat-right was electroporated into L. reuteri with selection on MRS medium of 3 μg/ml erythromycin (Em) and 3 μg/ml Cm. The recombinant L. reuteri-containing plasmid pMG36e-left-cat-right was propagated in MRS medium with 5 μg/ml Em at 37 ℃ for 30 generations without Em at 37 ℃ for 20 generations for the loss of plasmid subsequently. Then the cultures of the 20th generation were serially diluted from 10 to 107 in sterilized PBS and plated onto MRS medium without any antibiotics. After culturing for 48 h, the clones were spotted on the MRS medium with Em and Cm. After incubation at 37 °C for 48 h, the clones which were growing only on the MRS medium with Cm, were thought to be desired mutants. The sequences around the OCT gene were amplified and sequenced to confirm the mutants. PCR primers used in this study were listed in Supplementary Table 1.
Microarray
Expression of coding mRNA was analyzed by Beijing Capitalbio Technology Co., Ltd, according to our previously reported method[43]. Total RNA was extracted using Trizol (Life Technologies). Contaminating DNAs were removed using RNeasy spin columns (Qiagen). The quality of isolated RNA samples was evaluated with an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies) and the purified RNA was quantified using a NanoDrop ND-2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher). The Agilent Gene Expression oligo microarrays and miRNA microarrays were analyzed using Agilent Gene Expression oligo microarrays Version 6.5, May 2010 and Agilent miRNA microarrays Version 2.3. The R software (v.2.13.0) platform was applied to analyze the microarray data, and the LIMMA (linear regression model) package was used to statistically analyze differentially expressed genes. Genes having a fold change >2 or <−2 and an adjusted p < 0.05 were considered as differentially expressed.
Flow-cytometry analyses
Single-cell suspensions of Peyer’s patches (PP) and spleen of mice were prepared by mashing in a cell strainer (70 mm), stained, and analyzed by flow cytometry according to previous method[44]. In brief, colon or small intestine were isolated and cleaned by shaking in ice-cold PBS four times before tissue was cut into 1 -cm pieces. The epithelial cells were removed by incubating the tissue in HBSS with 2 mM EDTA for 30 min at 37 ℃ with shaking. The LP cells were isolated by incubating the tissues in digestion buffer (DMEM, 5% fetal bovine serum, and 1 mg/ml Collagenase IV and DNase I) for 40 min. The digested tissues were then filtered through a 40-mm filter. Cells were resuspended in 10 ml of the 40% fraction of a 40:80 Percoll gradient and overlaid on 5 ml of the 80% fraction in a 15-ml Falcon tube. LP cells were collected at the interphase of the Percoll gradient, washed, and resuspended in a medium, and then stained and analyzed by flow cytometry. Dead cells were eliminated through 7-AAD staining.For intracellular staining, the cells were cultured and stimulated for 6 h with 50 ng/ml phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate and 1 μg/ml ionomycin (Sigma) in the presence of GolgiStop. After incubation for 6 h, cells were washed in PBS, and then fixed in Cytofix/Cytoperm, permeabilized with Perm/Wash buffer, and stained with FITC-, PE-, APC- APC/cy7-, PerCP/Cy5.5-, or PE/cy7-conjugated antibodies. Meanwhile, dead cells were eliminated through 7-AAD staining.For intracellular IL-22 staining, cells were stimulated directly ex vivo by incubating for 6 h with 20 ng/ml rIL-23 in the presence of GolgiStop for the final 3 h of culture. Cells were fixed and permeabilized by using perm buffer set, as described by the manufacturers, and stained with IL-22 and RORγt antibodies.
Histological and immunostaining
For hematoxylin/eosin (H&E) staining, previously reported methods were used in this experiment[37]. Immunostaining was performed according to our previous method[37,45]. For RORγt(+)IL-22(+) cell staining, slides were treated with 0.1% Triton X-100, blocked with 3% H2O2. Then sections were blocked with 5% rabbit serum. Add 1:200 RORγt and IL-22 antibodies in Perm buffer for incubation overnight. Sections were then incubated with biotin-labeled goat anti-rat secondary antibody. Tyramide signal amplification was performed to RORγt staining. Fluorescence intensity was analyzed using ImageJ software.Alcian blue-periodic acid Schiff staining was used for mucin or goblet cells.
Immunostaining of mucus layers and localization of bacteria by fluorescent in situ hybridization
Mucus immune staining was paired with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) in order to analyze bacteria localization at the surface of the intestinal mucosa according to a reported method[23]. In brief, 5-μm sections were cut and dewaxed by preheating at 60 °C for 10 min, followed by bathing in xylene at 60 °C for 10 min, xylene at room temperature for 10 min, and 99.5% ethanol for 10 min. The hybridization step was performed at 50 °C overnight with a probe (EUB338 probe (5ʹ-GCTGCCTCCCGTAGGAGT-3ʹ with a 5ʹ Cy3 label for all bacteria, Huada, China and PNA probe (Lac663) FAM-O-ACATGGAGTTCCACT for lactobacillus, which were synthesized by PNA BIO INC) diluted to a final concentration of 0.01 μg/mL in hybridization buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 0.9 M NaCl, 0.1% SDS, and 20% formamide). After washing for 10 min in wash buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 0.9 M NaCl) and 10 min in PBS, block solution (5% FBS in PBS) was added for 30 min at 50 °C. Mucin 2 primary antibody was diluted to 1:200 in block solution and applied overnight at 4 °C. After washing in PBS, block solution containing anti-rabbit secondary antibody diluted to 1:200 was applied to the section for 2 h. Nuclei were stained using Hoechst33342. Observations were performed with a Zeiss LSM 700 confocal microscope with software Zen 2011 version 7.1. This software was used to determine the distance between bacteria and the epithelial cell monolayer, as well as the mucus thickness.
L-kynurenine HPLC–MS and HPLC–MS/MS analyses
HPLC–MS and HPLC–MS/MS analyses of L-kynurenine were performed by ProfLeader Biotechnology Company (Shanghai, China). Briefly, the UPLC–MS/MS analysis was performed on a Waters Acquity UPLC system coupled with a Waters Xevo-TQXS system. The mobile phase consisted of 20 mM ammonium acetate in water (A) and acetonitrile (B). The chromatographic separation was conducted by a gradient elution program as follows: 0 min, 5% B; 1 min, 5% B; 2 min, 25% B; 4 min, 60% B; 4.5 min, 95% B; 6 min, 95% B; 6.5 min, 5% B; 10 min, 5% B. The flow rate was 0.4 ml/min. Column temperature was 50 °C.
HPLC/MASS analyses of gut contents
For HPLC/MASS analyses of the gut contents, 50 mg of sample were applied to the extraction procedure, and extracted with 800 μL of methanol[46]. In total, 10 μL of internal standard (2.9 mg/mL, DL-o-chlorophenylalanine) was then added. All samples were grinded to fine powder using a grinding mill at 65 Hz for 90 s. The samples after grinding were vortexed for 30 s, and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm and 4 °C for 15 min. In total, 200 μL of supernatant was transferred to a vial for HPLC–MS analysis.
Ex vivo ileum and colon stimulation
For ex vivo ileum and colon stimulation, the fragmented fresh ileum and colon from untreated mice were immediately added in 2 ml of RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% heat-inactivated FBS (Gibco, Invitrogen), 100 U penicillin, 100 g/ml streptomycin, and 10 mm HEPES (Gibco, Invitrogen), and then L-ornithine was added into culture at the indicated concentration and time. For IDO1 analyses, the ileum or colon epithelial cells were separated from ileum or colon tissues using 0.1% EDTA, and expression of IDO1 was analyzed using qRT-PCR and immunoblotting.
ELISA
For ELISA of L-kynurenine and L-ornithine, the preparation of tissue homogenates was performed as previously described[47,48]. L-kynurenine and L-ornithine concentration in tissue homogenates or cell culture supernatants was measured using the L-kynurenine or L-Ornithine ELISA kit (ImmuSmol).
Western blotting
Cell lysates were denatured and subjected to SDS-PAGE, and then were transferred to PVDF membranes according to our previous methods[41,46]. Briefly, hybridizations with primary Abs were performed for 1 h at room temperature in blocking buffer. The protein–Ab complexes were checked using peroxidase-conjugated secondary Abs (Boehringer Mannheim) and ECL (Amersham Biosciences). The primary and secondary antibodies were listed in Supplementary Table 1.
RT-PCR and qRT-PCR
RT-PCR and qRT-PCR were performed according to our previous methods[41,46]. Briefly, total RNA was extracted from cells by using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) and was transcribed to cDNA using HiFiScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (CWBIO, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and then RT-PCR was done. qRT-PCR was performed by using HieffTMqPCR SYBR-Green Master Mix (YEASEN, Shanghai, China) in a Bio-Rad iQ5 multicolor RT-PCR system. The levels of each gene were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method. GAPDH was used as the endogenous control. The primers used for qRT-PCR were shown in Supplementary Table 1.
Statistical analyses
Student’s t test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), ANOVA plus post-Bonferroni analysis, Mann–Whitney U test, and Wilcoxon’s test were used to determine significance. A 95% confidence interval was considered significant and was defined as p < 0.05.
Reagents
The source of the reagents and primer sequences was listed in Supplementary Table 1.
Authors: Anna Ermund; André Schütte; Malin E V Johansson; Jenny K Gustafsson; Gunnar C Hansson Journal: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol Date: 2013-07-05 Impact factor: 4.052
Authors: Shinichiro Sawa; Matthias Lochner; Naoko Satoh-Takayama; Sophie Dulauroy; Marion Bérard; Melanie Kleinschek; Daniel Cua; James P Di Santo; Gérard Eberl Journal: Nat Immunol Date: 2011-02-20 Impact factor: 25.606
Authors: Jiří Hrdý; Aurélie Couturier-Maillard; Denise Boutillier; Carmen Lapadatescu; Philippe Blanc; Jan Procházka; Bruno Pot; Bernhard Ryffel; Corinne Grangette; Mathias Chamaillard Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-10-20 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Pablo Gallardo; Mariana Izquierdo; Roberto M Vidal; Francisco Soto; Juan C Ossa; Mauricio J Farfan Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol Date: 2020-09-18 Impact factor: 5.293
Authors: Shuo Han; Will Van Treuren; Curt R Fischer; Bryan D Merrill; Brian C DeFelice; Juan M Sanchez; Steven K Higginbottom; Leah Guthrie; Lalla A Fall; Dylan Dodd; Michael A Fischbach; Justin L Sonnenburg Journal: Nature Date: 2021-07-14 Impact factor: 49.962