| Literature DB >> 31098308 |
Abstract
Stroke has become a major disease seriously threating human health due to its high morbidity, mortality and disability. Rehabilitation nursing care for stroke patients has always been a key part of clinical care. The neurological nursing managers should pay high attention to the issue about how to more effectively improve the level of nurses' rehabilitation nursing on stroke patients. Therefore, this paper investigates the current cognition of neurological nurses about stroke knowledge, attitude and behaviour, and then analyses the factors affecting the knowledge, attitude and behaviour of stroke in the nurses, in order to provide better nursing services for stroke patients, and improve their nursing quality. The findings show that the different cognitions of nurses about their role have different effects on the knowledge, attitudes and behavioural levels of the neurological nurses; the nurses with more types of roles have better knowledge and behavioural levels of stroke.Entities:
Keywords: Cognition; Neurology; Rehabilitation Nursing; behavioral levels
Year: 2019 PMID: 31098308 PMCID: PMC6487783 DOI: 10.1515/tnsci-2019-0005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Neurosci ISSN: 2081-6936 Impact factor: 1.757
Project analysis results of each item of neurological nurse stroke knowledge questionnaire (n=240)
| Entry | High grouping | Low grouping | t | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.63±0.60 | 1.84±0.96 | 3.05 | 0.005** |
| 2 | 1.58±0.69 | 1.05±0.70 | 2.32 | 0.026* |
| 3 | 1.89±0.57 | 1.05±1.03 | 3.13 | 0.004** |
| 4 | 2.95±0.23 | 2.21±1.03 | 3.13 | 0.004** |
| 5 | 4.52±0.61 | 2.84±1.07 | 5.97 | <0.001** |
| 6 | 4.21±0.54 | 2.26±0.93 | 7.89 | <0.001** |
| 7 | 4.74±0.45 | 3.32±1.16 | 4.99 | <0.001** |
| 8 | 3.53±0.84 | 2.16±0.83 | 5.04 | <0.001* |
| 9 | 3.79±0.92 | 1.47±1.98 | 4.62 | <0.001** |
| 10 | 1.26±1.91 | 1.05±1.81 | 0.35 | 0.729 |
| 11 | 2.32±1.00 | 1.20±0.94 | 3.31 | 0.002** |
| 12 | 2.05±0.40 | 0.79±0.79 | 6.22 | <0.001** |
| 13 | 2.89±0.32 | 1.89±0.74 | 5.44 | <0.001** |
| 14 | 1.05±1.81 | 0.63±1.50 | 0.78 | 0.440 |
| 15 | 3.53±1.26 | 1.89±2.05 | 2.95 | 0.006** |
| 16 | 1.89±0.32 | 1.26±0.93 | 2.79 | 0.011* |
| 17 | 2.11±1.24 | 1.32±1.11 | 2.07 | 0.046* |
| 18 | 2.11±0.57 | 1.21±1.08 | 3.19 | 0.04** |
| 19 | 3.00±1.05 | 1.94±0.71 | 3.62 | 0.001* |
Note: *p<0.05 **p<0.001
Cronbach ‘alpha coefficient of each questionnaire and total questionnaire
| Questionnaire | Number of entries | Cronbach ‘alpha coefficient |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge questionnaire | 17 | 0.727 |
| Attitude questionnaire | 9 | 0.737 |
| Behavioural questionnaire | 14 | 0,935 |
| Total questionnaire | 40 | 0.861 |
Project analysis results of each item of neurological nurse stroke behaviour questionnaire (n=240)
| Entry | High grouping | Low grouping | t | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.37±0.76 | 2.04±0.62 | 6.14 | <0.001** |
| 2 | 3.47±0.51 | 2.17±0.64 | 7.27 | <0.001** |
| 3 | 3.63±0.50 | 2.21±0.66 | 7.83 | <0.001** |
| 4 | 3.58±0.51 | 1.79±0.78 | 8.64 | <0.001** |
| 5 | 3.58±0.69 | 1.54±0.83 | 8.57 | <0.001** |
| 6 | 3.84±0.50 | 1.83±0.64 | 11.25 | <0.001** |
| 7 | 3.68±0.58 | 2.50±0.51 | 7.10 | <0.001** |
| 8 | 3.74±0.45 | 2.08±0.50 | 11.32 | <0.001** |
| 9 | 3.74±0.56 | 2.58±0.78 | 5.65 | <0.001** |
| 10 | 3.89±0.32 | 2.33±0.64 | 10.49 | <0.001** |
| 11 | 3.58±0.61 | 2.21±0.72 | 6.63 | <0.001** |
| 12 | 3.58±0.51 | 1.96±0.86 | 7.27 | <0.001** |
| 13 | 3.84±0.37 | 2.21±0.72 | 9.59 | <0.001** |
| 14 | 3.63±0.50 | 2.00±0.88 | 7.18 | <0.001** |
Note: *p<0.05 **p<0.001
Figure 1Macroscopic picture of continuous rehabilitation nursing mode for stroke patients
Figure 2The role of neurological nurses in self-evaluation(n=240)
Comparison of stroke, knowledge, attitude and behaviour scores of nurses in different genders (n=240)
| Gender | n | Stroke knowledge | Stroke attitude | Stroke behaviour |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 11 | 30.81±5.98 | 29.27±6.42 | 40.09±11.82 |
| Female | 229 | 39.36±9.21 | 31.88±5.00 | 40.62±9.84 |
| t | -3.040 | -1.664 | -0.173 | |
| p | 0.003** | 0.097 | 0.863 |
Note: *p<0.05 **p<0.001
Comparison of stroke, knowledge, attitude and behaviour scores of medical staff with different professional titles (n=240)
| Job title | n | Knowledge score | Attitude score | Behavioral score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nurse | 111 | 34.66±9.37 | 31.18±6.19 | 39.64±10.40 |
| Head nurse | 94 | 41.51±6.87 | 31.79±4.00 | 40.57±9.37 |
| Supervisor | 32 | 6.16±7.39 | 33.37±3.25 | 43.78±9.70 |
| Deputy director nurse or above | 3 | 42.00±14.00 | 34.7±2.31 | 42.67±6.03 |
| F | 21.225 | 1.904 | 1.499 | |
| p | <0.01** | 0.130 | 0.216 |
Note: *p<0.05 **p<0.001
Figure 3Before and after intervention, the intervention group had different dimensions of quality of life
Comparison of stroke, knowledge, attitude and behaviour scores among nursing staff with or without history of stroke in relatives (n=240)
| Relatives with a history of stroke | n | Knowledge score | Attitude score | Behavioural score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | 83 | 41.48±8.11 | 31.86±4.29 | 40.96±10.05 |
| No | 157 | 37.64±9.7 | 31.71±5.48 | 40.40±9.86 |
| t | 3.728 | 0.214 | 0.417 | |
| p | 0.001** | 0.830 | 0.667 |
Note: *p<0.05 **p<0.001
Comparison of scores of stroke knowledge, attitudes and behaviours among medical staff who have participated in training (n=240)
| Participated in stroke training | n | Knowledge score | Attitude score | Behavioural score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | 170 | 40.05±8.94 | 31.62±5.20 | 41.01±9.98 |
| No | 70 | 36.34±9.54 | 32.09±4.83 | 39.60±9.75 |
| T | 2.860 | -0.639 | 0.999 | |
| p | 0.005** | 0.524 | 0.319 |
Note:*p<0.05 **p<0.001