Literature DB >> 31098060

The need for a regulatory rethink: a perspective from Australia.

Stephen Duckett1.   

Abstract

Traditional 'hierarchical' regulation involves checks and balances and external accountability and review bodies. There have been high profile failures of this approach in England (Mid Staffs) and Australia (Bundaberg, Queensland). The regulatory framework needs to be transformed to recognise the increasing use of market and market-like mechanisms in health care. Improvement in the ability to measure quality and safety of care using routine (already collected) data facilitates this. New regulation needs to ensure quality and financial incentives are aligned. New instruments such as incorporating safety/quality measures into service descriptions, use of patient reported outcome measures, and making information about expected outcomes of care to patients available, ought to be used more widely. Improved data capture, including whether a diagnosis was present on admission, will help in improving quality and safety of care and its measurement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Quality; pay for performance; routine data; safety

Year:  2014        PMID: 31098060      PMCID: PMC6438242          DOI: 10.7861/futurehosp.14.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Future Hosp J        ISSN: 2055-3323


  2 in total

1.  Clinical governance breakdown: Australian cases of wilful blindness and whistleblowing.

Authors:  Sonja Cleary; Maxine Duke
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 2.874

2.  Ripple effects: integrating international medical graduates from refugee backgrounds into the health system in Australia.

Authors:  Mercy Moraa Nyanchoga; Donata Sackey; Rebecca Farley; Rachel Claydon; Bryan Mukandi
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2022-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.