Literature DB >> 31097677

Factors associated with anorectal Chlamydia trachomatis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae test positivity in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Andrew Lau1, Fabian Yuh Shiong Kong2, Willa Huston3, Eric P F Chow4,5, Christopher K Fairley4,5, Jane S Hocking2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: There has been considerable discussion about anorectal Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) in women, with some calling for anorectal CT screening, but little about anorectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG). Given that urogenital NG is more strongly associated with pelvic inflammatory disease, this is an evidence gap. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates the associations between anorectal CT in women and CT positivity at other sites (urogenital/oropharyngeal) and with anal intercourse, and compares these with anorectal NG within the same study populations.
METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for English-language studies published to October 2018 using the following terms: ("Chlamydia" OR "Chlamydia trachomatis") AND (("anal" OR "rect*" OR "anorect*") OR ("extra?genital" OR "multi?site")). Studies were included if anorectal NG data were available. Random-effects meta-analyses calculated pooled estimates; heterogeneity was investigated using meta-regression.
RESULTS: 25 studies were eligible. Anorectal CT positivity ranged from 0% to 17.5%, with a summary estimate of 8.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 9.1; I2=88.5%). Anorectal NG positivity ranged from 0% to 17.0%, with a summary estimate of 2.1% (95% CI 1.6 to 2.8; I2=92.7%). The association between urogenital and anorectal positivity was stronger for NG than CT (summary prevalence ratio (PR)=89.3 (95% CI 53.1 to 150.3; I2=80.1%), PR=32.2 (95% CI 25.6 to 40.7; I2=70.3%), respectively), and between oropharyngeal and anorectal positivity it was stronger for NG than CT (PR=34.8 (95% CI 10.2 to 118.2; I2=89.9%), PR=8.8 (95% CI 6.8 to 11.5; I2=58.1%), respectively). Anal intercourse was associated with anorectal NG (PR=4.3; 95% CI 2.2 to 8.6; I2=0.0%) but not with anorectal CT (PR=1.0; 95% CI 0.7 to 1.4; I2=0.0%).
CONCLUSIONS: Anorectal CT is more common than anorectal NG, but anorectal NG is more strongly associated with anal intercourse, urogenital and oropharyngeal NG, suggesting that ongoing discussion about anorectal CT should also include NG. Longitudinal data are required to further understanding of the aetiology of anorectal STIs and assess whether anorectal screening is needed in women. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42df017080188. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990chlamydia trachomatiszzm321990; neisseria gonorrhoeae; systematic review, meta-analysis; women

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31097677     DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2018-053950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Infect        ISSN: 1368-4973            Impact factor:   3.519


  5 in total

Review 1.  Rectal Chlamydia trachomatis Infection: A Narrative Review of the State of the Science and Research Priorities.

Authors:  Christine M Khosropour; Julia C Dombrowski; Lucia Vojtech; Dorothy L Patton; Lee Ann Campbell; Lindley A Barbee; Michaela C Franzi; Kevin Hybiske
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.830

Review 2.  The role of saliva in gonorrhoea and chlamydia transmission to extragenital sites among men who have sex with men: new insights into transmission.

Authors:  Eric Pf Chow; Christopher K Fairley
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 5.396

Review 3.  Chlamydiae from Down Under: The Curious Cases of Chlamydial Infections in Australia.

Authors:  Martina Jelocnik
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2019-11-22

4.  Oral, Vaginal and Anal Sexual Practices among Heterosexual Males and Females Attending a Sexual Health Clinic: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Melbourne, Australia.

Authors:  Tiffany R Phillips; Heidi Constantinou; Christopher K Fairley; Catriona S Bradshaw; Kate Maddaford; Marcus Y Chen; Jane S Hocking; Eric P F Chow
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Current Resources for Evidence-Based Practice, May 2020.

Authors:  Marit L Bovbjerg
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2020-04-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.