Literature DB >> 31097170

68Ga-DOTATATE PET Identifies Residual Myocardial Inflammation and Bone Marrow Activation After Myocardial Infarction.

Jason M Tarkin, Claudia Calcagno, Marc R Dweck, Nicholas R Evans, Mohammed M Chowdhury, Deepa Gopalan, David E Newby, Zahi A Fayad, Martin R Bennett, James H F Rudd.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31097170      PMCID: PMC6525109          DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


× No keyword cloud information.
Myocardial infarction (MI) healing occurs in 2 phases: first an inflammatory phase, where clearance of necrotic debris occurs, followed by a reparative phase characterized by angiogenesis, granulation tissue formation, and attempts to repair the extracellular matrix. While efficient healing relies on coordinated mobilization of monocytes to the damaged myocardium, with resolution of the acute inflammatory response by ∼10 to 14 days, excessive inflammation impairs myocardial salvage and promotes adverse cardiac remodeling. In ischemic heart failure, pro-inflammatory macrophages persist long after the formation of healed scar in remote and border zones of the infarcted, remodeled heart because of maladaptive changes in the mononuclear phagocytic network and spleen (1). An accurate means of diagnosing harmful inflammation after an MI is urgently needed. We previously demonstrated that 68Ga-DOTATATE, a somatostatin receptor subtype-2 positron emission tomography (PET) ligand, could identify pro-inflammatory macrophages within atherosclerotic plaques (2). Here, in this substudy of our original prospective observational study, we examined whether 68Ga-DOTATATE could reveal residual post-infarction myocardial inflammation. Patients with an MI within 3 months treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (“recent MI,” n = 6), and patients with a past history of MI and echocardiography data available from after their event (“old MI,” n = 6), were included. Patients with equivocal culprit arteries, and those managed medically or with coronary artery bypass grafting surgery, were excluded. ECG-gated PET imaging was performed as previously described (2). Maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and tissue-to-blood ratios (TBRmax), normalized for blood pool activity in the superior vena cava, were derived blinded to clinical details in each of the 16 myocardial segments. Myocardial 68Ga-DOTATATE and 18F-FDG PET signals were compared: 1) within infarcted and noninfarcted segments; 2) to each other; and 3) to tracer activity in the thoracic vertebral bone marrow as an experimental marker of systemic inflammation, using standard nonparametric statistical tests (all data median [interquartile range (IQR)] unless stated). Recently infarcted myocardial segments were defined by clinically adjudicated (treated) culprit artery territories, with individual anatomical variation verified by angiography. In patients with old MI, infarcted myocardium was determined by echocardiographic wall motion abnormalities (hypokinesia/akinesia), assessed independently of the study and prior to enrollment. Demographics were similar for recent MI (age 74 years [IQR: 64 to 78 years], 83% male) and old MI (age 59 years [IQR: 56 to 72 years], all male) patients. There were 3 ST-segment elevation MIs, which were all old MIs. PET imaging occurred 35 days (range 21 to 80 days) after recent MIs, and 7 years (range 1.8 to 22 years) after old MIs, with 2 days (range 1 to 21 days) in between 68Ga-DOTATATE and 18F-FDG scans. 68Ga-DOTATATE signals were higher in infarcted compared with noninfarcted myocardium in patients with both recent MI (SUVmax 1.60 [IQR: 1.45 to 2.11] vs. 1.33 [IQR: 1.25 to 1.52]; p = 0.03; TBRmax 2.33 [IQR: 1.55 to 2.71] vs. 1.80 [IQR: 1.32 to 2.22]; p = 0.03) and old MI (SUVmax 2.22 [IQR: 2.03 to 2.50] vs. 1.78 [IQR: 1.63 to 2.13]; p < 0.0001; TBRmax 2.79 [IQR: 2.47 to 3.23] vs. 1.89 [IQR: 1.52 to 2.36]; p < 0.0001). Unlike 68Ga-DOTATATE, which exhibited very low background myocardial binding in all patients, avid myocardial 18F-FDG uptake (basal inferoseptum SUVmax >5) rendered 5 (42%) scans uninterpretable despite 6-h pre-scan fasting. In the readable scans, the 2 tracers showed reasonable agreement in the myocardium (r = 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.20 to 0.53; p < 0.0001). Despite high liver and spleen 68Ga-DOTATATE activity, focal myocardial signals were clearly distinguishable in all 5 patients with inferior infarcts. Bone marrow 68Ga-DOTATATE signals were highly correlated with both infarct-related myocardial inflammation detected by 68Ga-DOTATATE (r = 0.83 [95% CI: 0.48 to 0.95]; p = 0.001), and metabolic bone marrow activity measured by 18F-FDG (r = 0.64 [95% CI: 0.08 to 0.89]; p = 0.03). We found that 68Ga-DOTATATE identified active inflammation in recently infarcted myocardium, as well as old ischemic injury. Our observations agree with existing clinical data (3), but contradict findings in mice (4). 68Ga-DOTATATE binding in chronically damaged myocardium, particularly at the infarct border (Figure 1), likely reflects residual macrophage-driven inflammation; however, histological validation is needed. While tracer binding to myocytes and/or fibroblasts are possible alternative explanations, transcriptomic data from infarcted mouse hearts (5) indicates that SSTR2 is not expressed in these cell types.
Figure 1

Post-Infarction Myocardial Inflammation Identified by 68Ga-DOTATATE PET

(A)68Ga-DOTATATE positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography image (scale bar: standardized uptake values) demonstrating residual inflammation (arrow) in (B) partially viable myocardium with subendocardial infarct (dashed arrow), bordering full-thickness scarring (asterisk) confirmed by late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging, 4 years after a left anterior descending artery myocardial infarction. 18F-FDG positron emission tomography imaging reproduced a near-identical pattern of abnormal myocardial tracer uptake. Stress magnetic resonance imaging was negative for ischemia.

Post-Infarction Myocardial Inflammation Identified by 68Ga-DOTATATE PET (A)68Ga-DOTATATE positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography image (scale bar: standardized uptake values) demonstrating residual inflammation (arrow) in (B) partially viable myocardium with subendocardial infarct (dashed arrow), bordering full-thickness scarring (asterisk) confirmed by late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging, 4 years after a left anterior descending artery myocardial infarction. 18F-FDG positron emission tomography imaging reproduced a near-identical pattern of abnormal myocardial tracer uptake. Stress magnetic resonance imaging was negative for ischemia. Residual myocardial inflammation detected by 68Ga-DOTATATE could represent an important prognostic biomarker to study disease mechanisms and test novel therapies for the inflamed, failing heart.
  5 in total

1.  Imaging of myocardial inflammation with somatostatin receptor based PET/CT - A comparison to cardiac MRI.

Authors:  Constantin Lapa; Theresa Reiter; Xiang Li; Rudolf A Werner; Samuel Samnick; Roland Jahns; Andreas K Buck; Georg Ertl; Wolfgang R Bauer
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 4.164

2.  Targeting post-infarct inflammation by PET imaging: comparison of (68)Ga-citrate and (68)Ga-DOTATATE with (18)F-FDG in a mouse model.

Authors:  James T Thackeray; Jens P Bankstahl; Yong Wang; Mortimer Korf-Klingebiel; Almut Walte; Alexander Wittneben; Kai C Wollert; Frank M Bengel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Remodeling of the mononuclear phagocyte network underlies chronic inflammation and disease progression in heart failure: critical importance of the cardiosplenic axis.

Authors:  Mohamed Ameen Ismahil; Tariq Hamid; Shyam S Bansal; Bindiya Patel; Justin R Kingery; Sumanth D Prabhu
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 17.367

4.  Multicellular Transcriptional Analysis of Mammalian Heart Regeneration.

Authors:  Gregory A Quaife-Ryan; Choon Boon Sim; Mark Ziemann; Antony Kaspi; Haloom Rafehi; Mirana Ramialison; Assam El-Osta; James E Hudson; Enzo R Porrello
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Detection of Atherosclerotic Inflammation by 68Ga-DOTATATE PET Compared to [18F]FDG PET Imaging.

Authors:  Jason M Tarkin; Francis R Joshi; Nicholas R Evans; Mohammed M Chowdhury; Nichola L Figg; Aarti V Shah; Lakshi T Starks; Abel Martin-Garrido; Roido Manavaki; Emma Yu; Rhoda E Kuc; Luigi Grassi; Roman Kreuzhuber; Myrto A Kostadima; Mattia Frontini; Peter J Kirkpatrick; Patrick A Coughlin; Deepa Gopalan; Tim D Fryer; John R Buscombe; Ashley M Groves; Willem H Ouwehand; Martin R Bennett; Elizabeth A Warburton; Anthony P Davenport; James H F Rudd
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 24.094

  5 in total
  10 in total

Review 1.  Clinical imaging of cardiovascular inflammation.

Authors:  Claudia Calcagno; Zahi A Fayad
Journal:  Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 2.346

Review 2.  Multimodality imaging for the prevention of cardiovascular events: Coronary artery calcium and beyond.

Authors:  Duygu Kocyigit; Alexandra Scanameo; Bo Xu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06

Review 3.  Advances in Radiopharmaceutical Sciences for Vascular Inflammation Imaging: Focus on Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Kevin Prigent; Jonathan Vigne
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 4.  Clinical Applications of Somatostatin Receptor (Agonist) PET Tracers beyond Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Rasmus Helgebostad; Mona-Elisabeth Revheim; Kjersti Johnsrud; Kristine Amlie; Abass Alavi; James Patrick Connelly
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-18

Review 5.  Nuclear Molecular Imaging of Cardiac Remodeling after Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Zohreh Varasteh; Wolfgang A Weber; Christoph Rischpler
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-31

6.  Regional analysis of inflammation and contractile function in reperfused acute myocardial infarction by in vivo 19F cardiovascular magnetic resonance in pigs.

Authors:  Florian Bönner; M Gastl; F Nienhaus; M Rothe; A Jahn; S Pfeiler; U Gross; H-P Schultheiss; B Ibanez; S Kozerke; J Szendroedi; M Roden; R Westenfeld; J Schrader; U Flögel; G Heusch; M Kelm
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 12.416

7.  Systematically evaluating DOTATATE and FDG as PET immuno-imaging tracers of cardiovascular inflammation.

Authors:  Yohana C Toner; Adam A Ghotbi; Sonum Naidu; Ken Sakurai; Mandy M T van Leent; Stefan Jordan; Farideh Ordikhani; Letizia Amadori; Alexandros Marios Sofias; Elizabeth L Fisher; Alexander Maier; Nathaniel Sullivan; Jazz Munitz; Max L Senders; Christian Mason; Thomas Reiner; Georgios Soultanidis; Jason M Tarkin; James H F Rudd; Chiara Giannarelli; Jordi Ochando; Carlos Pérez-Medina; Andreas Kjaer; Willem J M Mulder; Zahi A Fayad; Claudia Calcagno
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Left ventricular remodelling post-myocardial infarction: pathophysiology, imaging, and novel therapies.

Authors:  Stefan Frantz; Moritz Jens Hundertmark; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Frank Michael Bengel; Johann Bauersachs
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 35.855

Review 9.  PET Imaging of Post-infarct Myocardial Inflammation.

Authors:  Andrej Ćorović; Meritxell Nus; Ziad Mallat; James H F Rudd; Jason M Tarkin
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 10.  Imaging Atherosclerosis by PET, With Emphasis on the Role of FDG and NaF as Potential Biomarkers for This Disorder.

Authors:  Michael Mayer; Austin J Borja; Emily C Hancin; Thomas Auslander; Mona-Elisabeth Revheim; Mateen C Moghbel; Thomas J Werner; Abass Alavi; Chamith S Rajapakse
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 4.566

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.