Literature DB >> 31097163

Pacemaker Implantation After Mitral Valve Surgery With Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

Joseph J DeRose1, Donna M Mancini2, Helena L Chang3, Michael Argenziano4, François Dagenais5, Gorav Ailawadi6, Louis P Perrault7, Michael K Parides1, Wendy C Taddei-Peters8, Michael J Mack9, Donald D Glower10, Babatunde A Yerokun10, Pavan Atluri11, John C Mullen12, John D Puskas13, Karen O'Sullivan3, Nancy M Sledz3, Hugo Tremblay5, Ellen Moquete3, Bart S Ferket3, Alan J Moskowitz3, Alexander Iribarne14, Annetine C Gelijns3, Patrick T O'Gara15, Eugene H Blackstone16, A Marc Gillinov16.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is higher following mitral valve surgery (MVS) with ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) compared with MVS alone.
OBJECTIVES: This study identified risk factors and outcomes associated with PPM implantation in a randomized trial that evaluated ablation for AF in patients who underwent MVS.
METHODS: A total of 243 patients with AF and without previous PPM placement were randomly assigned to MVS alone (n = 117) or MVS + ablation (n = 126). Patients in the ablation group were further randomized to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) (n = 62) or the biatrial maze procedure (n = 64). Using competing risk models, this study examined the association among PPM and baseline and operative risk factors, and the effect of PPM on time to discharge, readmissions, and 1-year mortality.
RESULTS: Thirty-five patients received a PPM within the first year (14.4%), 29 (83%) underwent implantation during the index hospitalization. The frequency of PPM implantation was 7.7% in patients randomized to MVS alone, 16.1% in MVS + PVI, and 25% in MVS + biatrial maze. The indications for PPM were similar among patients who underwent MVS with and without ablation. Ablation, multivalve surgery, and New York Heart Association functional (NYHA) functional class III/IV were independent risk factors for PPM implantation. Length of stay post-surgery was longer in patients who received PPMs, but it was not significant when adjusted for randomization assignment (MVS vs. ablation) and age (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61 to 1.08; p = 0.14). PPM implantation did not increase 30-day readmission rate (HR: 1.43; 95% CI: 0.50 to 4.05; p = 0.50). The need for PPM was associated with a higher risk of 1-year mortality (HR: 3.21; 95% CI: 1.01 to 10.17; p = 0.05) after adjustment for randomization assignment, age, and NYHA functional class.
CONCLUSIONS: AF ablation, multivalve surgery, and NYHA functional class III/IV were associated with an increased risk for permanent pacing. PPM implantation following MVS was associated with a significant increase in 1-year mortality. (Surgical Ablation Versus No Surgical Ablation for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Mitral Valve Surgery; NCT00903370).
Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biatrial maze; cardiac surgery; permanent pacemaker; pulmonary vein isolation; valvular heart disease

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31097163      PMCID: PMC6602091          DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  9 in total

1.  Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery.

Authors:  A Marc Gillinov; Annetine C Gelijns; Michael K Parides; Joseph J DeRose; Alan J Moskowitz; Pierre Voisine; Gorav Ailawadi; Denis Bouchard; Peter K Smith; Michael J Mack; Michael A Acker; John C Mullen; Eric A Rose; Helena L Chang; John D Puskas; Jean-Philippe Couderc; Timothy J Gardner; Robin Varghese; Keith A Horvath; Steven F Bolling; Robert E Michler; Nancy L Geller; Deborah D Ascheim; Marissa A Miller; Emilia Bagiella; Ellen G Moquete; Paula Williams; Wendy C Taddei-Peters; Patrick T O'Gara; Eugene H Blackstone; Michael Argenziano
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Incidence and predictors of pacemaker placement after surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Berhane Worku; Sang-Woo Pak; Faisal Cheema; Mark Russo; Brian Housman; Danielle Van Patten; Jessica Harris; Michael Argenziano
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Biatrial or Left Atrial Lesion Set for Ablation During Mitral Surgery: Risks and Benefits.

Authors:  Andrei Churyla; Adam Iddriss; Adin-Christian Andrei; Jane Kruse; S Chris Malaisrie; Rod Passman; Zhi Li; Richard Lee; Patrick M McCarthy
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 4.  Ablation of atrial fibrillation with concomitant cardiac surgery.

Authors:  A Marc Gillinov; Adam E Saltman
Journal:  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007

5.  Midterm survival in patients treated for atrial fibrillation: a propensity-matched comparison to patients without a history of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Richard Lee; Patrick M McCarthy; Edward C Wang; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Jane Kruse; S Chris Malaisrie; Edwin C McGee
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation, but they do increase procedural morbidity.

Authors:  Lori K Soni; Sophia R Cedola; Jacob Cogan; Jeffrey Jiang; Jonathan Yang; Hiroo Takayama; Michael Argenziano
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Epidemiologic features of chronic atrial fibrillation: the Framingham study.

Authors:  W B Kannel; R D Abbott; D D Savage; P M McNamara
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-04-29       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Atrial fibrillation correction surgery: lessons from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Database.

Authors:  James S Gammie; Michel Haddad; Sarah Milford-Beland; Karl F Welke; T Bruce Ferguson; Sean M O'Brien; Bartley P Griffith; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Predictors and risk of pacemaker implantation after the Cox-maze IV procedure.

Authors:  Jason O Robertson; Phillip S Cuculich; Lindsey L Saint; Richard B Schuessler; Marc R Moon; Jennifer Lawton; Ralph J Damiano; Hersh S Maniar
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 4.330

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Isolated left atrial cryoablation of atrial fibrillation in conventional mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gatti; Ilaria Fiorica; Luca Dell'Angela; Marco Morosin; Giorgio Faganello; Chiara Cappelletto; Linda Pagura; Alessandro Ceschia; Rita Piazza; Aniello Pappalardo
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2020-10-16

Review 2.  Arrhythmias in Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Gaps in Knowledge and the Way Forward.

Authors:  Maciej Kubala; Christian de Chillou; Yohann Bohbot; Patrizio Lancellotti; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Christophe Tribouilloy
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-02-15

3.  Results of concomitant cryoablation for atrial fibrillation during mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Alexander Bogachev-Prokophiev; Ravil Sharifulin; Anastasiia Karadzha; Sergey Zheleznev; Alexander Afanasyev; Mikhail Ovcharov; Alexey Pivkin; Anton Zalesov; Sergey Budagaev; Sergey Ivantsov; Alexander Chernyavsky
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-03-31

4.  Effect of electrophysiological mapping on non-transmural annulus ablation and atrial fibrillation recurrence prediction after 6 months of Cox-Maze IV procedure.

Authors:  Zhishan Sun; Chengming Fan; Long Song; Hao Zhang; Zenan Jiang; Haoyu Tan; Yaqin Sun; Liming Liu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.