| Literature DB >> 31096746 |
Shahabeddin Sarvi1,2, Tooran Nayeri Chegeni1,2,3, Mehdi Sharif1,2,4, Mahbobeh Montazeri1,2, Seyed Abdollah Hosseini1,2, Afsaneh Amouei1,2, Zahra Hosseininejad1,2,3, Davood Anvari1,2,3, Reza Saberi1,2,3, Shaban Gohardehi1,2, Ahmad Daryani1,2.
Abstract
Toxoplasmosis is a serious zoonotic disease that can lead to abortion and congenital disorders and has a widespread global distribution in humans and animals. The objective of this review was to investigate the incidence of toxoplasmosis in Iranian neonates in order to obtain a comprehensive assessment of the overall situation of the disease for use in developing future interventions. Original studies investigating the incidence of Toxoplasma gondii infections in Iranian neonates were systematically searched in a number of English-language and Persian-language electronic databases. The search process resulted in the inclusion of a total of 11 studies in the systematic review, 10 of which were entered into the meta-analysis. The reviewed articles included 2,230 Iranian neonates investigated through January 1, 2018. Based on the retrieved studies, the overall weighted incidence rates of toxoplasmosis in the Iranian neonatal population and neonates with suspected congenital toxoplasmosis were estimated to be 0.64% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31 to 1.09) and 4.10% (95% CI, 2.68 to 5.77), respectively, using a fixed-effects model. The findings of the reviewed studies demonstrate that the incidence of toxoplasmosis is high in Iranian neonates. Accordingly, it can be concluded that toxoplasmosis is a serious public health concern that has been ignored by the Ministry of Health. Therefore, it is essential to perform further studies, in addition to implementing screening and detection programs, using standardized methods to estimate the incidence of toxoplasmosis in Iran and to determine its associated risk factors.Entities:
Keywords: Incidence; Iran; Neonate; Systematic review; Toxoplasmosis
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31096746 PMCID: PMC6635660 DOI: 10.4178/epih.e2019021
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Epidemiol Health ISSN: 2092-7193
Figure 1.The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flow diagram of the search strategy, study selection, and data management procedure of Toxoplasma gondii infection in neonates in Iran.
Characteristics of the included studies of Toxoplasma gondii infection in neonates in Iran
| Study | City | Neonates (n) | IgG (n) | IgM (n) | PCR (n) | Method | Design |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alameh et al., 2002 [ | Isfahan | 18 | 7 | 0 | - | IFA | Cross-sectional |
| Gharavi, 2003 [ | Tehran | 18 | 18 | 8 | - | IFA, ISAGA | Cross-sectional |
| Assmar et al., 2004 [ | Tehran | 11 | 11 | 4 | 4 | PCR | Cross-sectional |
| Mehbod et al., 2005 [ | Tehran | 210 | 79 | 8 | - | ELISA, IFA | Cross-sectional |
| Shaddel et al., 2007 [ | Tehran | 104 | ELISA: 38, IFA: 60 | ELISA: 6, IFA: 5, total: 7 | 6 | ELISA, IFA, PCR | Cross-sectional |
| Golalipour et al., 2009 [ | Gorgan | 64 | 23 | 2 | - | ELISA | Cross-sectional |
| Noorbakhsh et al., 2012 [ | Tehran | 50 | 9 | 5 | - | ELISA | Case-control |
| Noorbakhsh et al., 2013 [ | Tehran | 270 | 119 | 4 | 0 | ELISA, PCR | Cohort |
| Zavari et al., 2015 [ | Rafsanjan | 254 | 83 | 1 | - | ELISA | Cross-sectional |
| Rasti et al., 2015 [ | Kashan | 9 | 9 | 0 | 3 | ELISA, PCR | Cohort |
| Shieh et al., 2017 [ | Arak | 261 | 37 | 3 | 1 | ELISA, PCR | Cross-sectional |
IgG, immunoglobulin G; IgM, immunoglobulin M; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; IFA, immunofluorescence assay; ISAGA, immunosorbent agglutination assay; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Figure 2.Forest plot diagram of the studies showing incidence rates of Toxoplasma infection in (A) neonates and (B) neonates with suspected congenital toxoplasmosis.
Quality assessment of the included studies based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale[1]
| Study | Selection (3 points) | Comparability (2 points) | Outcome (3 points) | Total score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alameh et al., 2002 [ | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Gharavi, 2003 [ | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Assmar et al., 2004 [ | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Mehbod et al., 2005 [ | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Shaddel et al., 2007 [ | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Golalipour et al., 2009 [ | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Noorbakhsh et al., 2012 [ | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| Noorbakhsh et al., 2013 [ | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| Zavari et al., 2015 [ | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| Rasti et al., 2015 [ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
| Shieh et al., 2017 [ | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
Good: 7-9; fair: 4-6; poor: ≤3 for case-control studies and good: 6-7; fair: 3-5; poor: 1-2 for cross-sectional studies.
Figure 3.Bias assessment plot from Egger in the meta-analysis in (A) neonates, (B) neonates with suspected congenital toxoplasmosis.