| Literature DB >> 31096674 |
Angelika Kamizela1, Barbara Gawdzik2, Mariusz Urbaniak3, Łukasz Lechowicz4, Agata Białońska5, Sylwia Ewa Kutniewska6, Weronika Gonciarz7, Magdalena Chmiela8.
Abstract
This paper presents the synthesis of γ -halo- δ -lactones, δ -iodo- γ -lactones and δ -hydroxy- γ -lactones from readily available organic substrates such as trans-crotonaldehyde and aryl bromides. Crystal structure analysis was carried out for lactones that were obtained in crystalline form. All halo- δ -lactones and δ -hydroxy- γ -lactones were highly cytotoxic against gastric cancer AGS cells with I C 50 values in the range of 0.0006-0.0044 mM. Some lactones showed high bactericidal activity against E. coli ATCC 8739 and S. aureus ATCC 65389, which reduced the number of CFU/mL by 70-83% and 87% respectively.Entities:
Keywords: anti-cancer properties; bactericidal properties; halolactones; hydroxylactones; translactonization
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31096674 PMCID: PMC6572184 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24101875
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1A four-step synthesis of -halo--lactones and -hydroxy--lactones.
The yields and products distribution from halolactonization of unsaturated carboxylic acids 4a–c (according to GC).
| yield [%] |
|
| yield [%] |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 51 | 72 | ||||
|
| 82 | 72 | ||||
|
| 62 | 78 | ||||
Figure 2Mechanisms of chloro- and bromolactonization of ,-unsaturated carboxylic acids with NCS and NBS.
The yields and products distribution from iodolactonization of unsaturated carboxylic acids 4a–c (according to GC).
| yield [%] |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| - | - | |||||
|
| 75 | - | |||||
|
| 69 | - | |||||
Figure 3The translactonization mechanism of -iodo--lactones.
Figure 4The comparison of the NMR signals for H-6 and H-5 protons of: (a) trans,trans--bromo--lactone 7b and (b) cis,trans--bromo--lactone 8b.
Figure 5The crystalline structure of: (a) trans,trans--chloro--lactone 5a; and (b) trans,trans--bromo--lactone 7a.
Figure 6The crystalline structure of: (a) cis--hydroxy--lactone 13a; (b) trans--hydroxy--lactone 12b; and (c) trans--hydroxy--lactone 12c.
Figure 7The comparison of the NMR signals for H-5 and H-6 protons of: (a) trans--hydroxy--lactone 12b; and (b) cis--hydroxy--lactone 13a.
The bactericidal activity of the investigated lactones against Escherichia coli ATCC 8739 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 65389.
| Compound | ||
|---|---|---|
| Number of CFU/mL (× | ||
|
| 6.41 | 2.74 |
|
| 4.06 | 7.63 |
|
| 9.46 | 14.83 |
|
| 7.58 | 5.20 |
|
| 6.32 | 3.58 |
|
| 2.06 | 7.39 |
|
| 5.21 | 4.63 |
|
| 8.63 | 10.96 |
|
| 6.52 | 6.42 |
|
| 7.14 | 9.29 |
|
| 5.83 | 9.04 |
|
| 8.87 | 3.60 |
|
| 9.02 | 21.25 |
|
| 2.43 | 9.76 |
|
| 7.65 | 5.92 |
|
| 2.87 | 6.30 |
|
| 9.43 | 21.15 |
|
| 6.02 | 9.12 |
| Control | 9.47 | 21.36 |
| Control with DMSO | 9.30 | 20.85 |
The cytotoxic activity of tested lactones against AGS cell lines.
| Lactone | Concentration [ | 5% DMSO | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 | 20 | 10 | 5 | 0.5 | 0.1 | |||
|
| 15 ± 0.01 | 18 ± 0.08 | 27 ± 0.10 | 43 ± 0.09 | 48 ± 0.05 | 54 ± 0.07 | 85 ± 0.1 | 0.0019 |
|
| 8 ± 0.09 | 11 ± 0.07 | 14 ± 0.12 | 16 ± 0.06 | 20 ± 0.09 | 35 ± 0.06 | 0.0023 | |
|
| 10 ± 0.12 | 21 ± 0.08 | 34 ± 0.09 | 44 ± 0.10 | 47 ± 0.12 | 54 ± 0.12 | 0.0006 | |
|
| 8 ± 0.05 | 8 ± 0.09 | 19 ± 0.01 | 23 ± 0.09 | 28 ± 0.07 | 35 ± 0.06 | 0.0019 | |
|
| 8 ± 0.06 | 14 ± 0.07 | 21 ± 0.02 | 28 ± 0.03 | 35 ± 0.02 | 42 ± 0.02 | 0.0044 | |
|
| 6 ± 0.08 | 14 ± 0.07 | 16 ± 0.10 | 28 ± 0.06 | 37 ± 0.05 | 49 ± 0.10 | 0.0029 | |
|
| 8 ± 0.03 | 20 ± 0.06 | 21 ± 0.03 | 25 ± 0.10 | 26 ± 0.05 | 39 ± 0.02 | 0.0021 | |
|
| 10 ± 0.06 | 14 ± 0.03 | 20 ± 0.06 | 23 ± 0.02 | 25 ± 0.10 | 40 ± 0.10 | 0.0036 | |
|
| 8 ± 0.07 | 18 ± 0.10 | 25 ± 0.12 | 42 ± 0.02 | 49 ± 0.06 | 63 ± 0.03 | 0.0035 | |
|
| 9 ± 0.09 | 17 ± 0.07 | 25 ± 0.05 | 39 ± 0.09 | 47 ± 0.06 | 61 ± 0.10 | 0.0016 | |
|
| 11 ± 0.05 | 17 ± 0.10 | 28 ± 0.09 | 31 ± 0.02 | 35 ± 0.10 | 44 ± 0.15 | 0.0019 | |
|
| 10 ± 0.09 | 11 ± 0.03 | 18 ± 0.07 | 43 ± 0.10 | 58 ± 0.10 | 69 ± 0.15 | 0.0025 | |
|
| 8 ± 0.09 | 15 ± 0.06 | 26 ± 0.03 | 43 ± 0.12 | 52 ± 0.15 | 54 ± 0.15 | 0.0014 | |
|
| 15 ± 0.03 | 18 ± 0.06 | 23 ± 0.02 | 35 ± 0.10 | 43 ± 0.15 | 51 ± 0.10 | 0.0014 | |
|
| 10 ± 0.06 | 14 ± 0.08 | 16 ± 0.09 | 37 ± 0.03 | 43 ± 0.02 | 58 ± 0.07 | 0.0018 | |
|
| 8 ± 0.03 | 10 ± 0.07 | 13 ± 0.03 | 20 ± 0.02 | 23 ± 0.15 | 38 ± 0.06 | 0.0017 | |
|
| 9 ± 0.10 | 13 ± 0.08 | 18 ± 0.05 | 22 ± 0.09 | 26 ± 0.05 | 39 ± 0.09 | 0.0043 | |
|
| 8 ± 0.08 | 10 ± 0.10 | 18 ± 0.12 | 29 ± 0.05 | 39 ± 0.09 | 44 ± 0.12 | 0.0037 | |
The cytotoxicity was assessed by (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) (MTT) reduction assay. The cell viability was calculated for four experiments including three repeats for each compound. Complete RPMI-1640 medium was used as a positive control (Control +) of cell viability (100% viable cells) and 0.03% HO as a negative control (Control −) of cell viability (100% dead inactive cells). All values were expressed as the mean percentage of viable cells ± SD. The differences between positive control and treated with tested compounds were evaluated by non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test. Statistical significance: p < 0.05. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was used as a solvent; , half maximal inhibitory concentration.
The cytotoxic activity of tested lactones against L929 cell lines.
| Lactone | Concentration [ | 5% DMSO | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 | 20 | 10 | 5 | 0.5 | 0.1 | |||
|
| 1 ± 0.01 | 5 ± 0.06 | 8 ± 0.07 | 10 ± 0.03 | 15 ± 0.02 | 17 ± 0.09 | 79 ± 0.07 | 0.0058 |
|
| 1 ± 0.03 | 4 ± 0.02 | 7 ± 0.06 | 12 ± 0.05 | 18 ± 0.15 | 20 ± 0.08 | 0.0071 | |
|
| 2 ± 0.12 | 4 ± 0.06 | 10 ± 0.03 | 14 ± 0.09 | 21 ± 0.15 | 26 ± 0.03 | 0.0078 | |
|
| 2 ± 0.09 | 6 ± 0.03 | 7 ± 0.07 | 9 ± 0.15 | 11 ± 0.08 | 15 ± 0.03 | 0.0083 | |
|
| 2 ± 0.05 | 4 ± 0.15 | 16 ± 0.03 | 25 ± 0.02 | 27 ± 0.12 | 32 ± 0.07 | 0.0041 | |
|
| 2 ± 0.02 | 4 ± 0.08 | 9 ± 0.05 | 18 ± 0.12 | 22 ± 0.05 | 24 ± 0.03 | 0.0047 | |
|
| 1 ± 0.12 | 2 ± 0.03 | 6 ± 0.07 | 12 ± 0.02 | 18 ± 0.12 | 25 ± 0.02 | 0.0043 | |
|
| 2 ± 0.09 | 5 ± 0.15 | 10 ± 0.05 | 13 ± 0.12 | 18 ± 0.08 | 25 ± 0.03 | 0.0048 | |
|
| 1 ± 0.03 | 5 ± 0.05 | 11 ± 0.08 | 17 ± 0.02 | 21 ± 0.08 | 27 ± 0.08 | 0.0066 | |
|
| 1 ± 0.15 | 4 ± 0.02 | 7 ± 0.06 | 14 ± 0.03 | 19 ± 0.03 | 23 ± 0.03 | 0.0044 | |
|
| 1 ± 0.02 | 4 ± 0.08 | 8 ± 0.05 | 15 ± 0.03 | 17 ± 0.08 | 24 ± 0.03 | 0.0055 | |
|
| 1 ± 0.05 | 5 ± 0.02 | 11 ± 0.03 | 15 ± 0.03 | 20 ± 0.08 | 25 ± 0.03 | 0.0044 | |
|
| 1 ± 0.12 | 4 ± 0.15 | 11 ± 0.06 | 13 ± 0.07 | 18 ± 0.03 | 23 ± 0.03 | 0.0044 | |
|
| 1 ± 0.05 | 3 ± 0.09 | 6 ± 0.03 | 9 ± 0.06 | 12 ± 0.08 | 15 ± 0.03 | 0.0068 | |
|
| 1 ± 0.02 | 5 ± 0.06 | 7 ± 0.15 | 15 ± 0.08 | 20 ± 0.03 | 25 ± 0.08 | 0.0040 | |
|
| 2 ± 0.05 | 2 ± 0.15 | 6 ± 0.09 | 12 ± 0.07 | 18 ± 0.03 | 22 ± 0.05 | 0.0041 | |
|
| 2 ± 0.06 | 3 ± 0.03 | 8 ± 0.06 | 10 ± 0.02 | 15 ± 0.05 | 19 ± 0.15 | 0.0062 | |
|
| 1 ± 0.07 | 5 ± 0.12 | 6 ± 0.06 | 9 ± 0.03 | 12 ± 0.02 | 16 ± 0.09 | 0.0081 | |
The cytotoxicity was assessed by (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) (MTT) reduction assay. The cell viability was calculated for four experiments including three repeats for each compound. Complete RPMI-1640 medium was used as a positive control (Control +) of cell viability (100% viable cells) and 0.03% HO as a negative control (Control −) of cell viability (100% dead inactive cells). All values were expressed as the mean percentage of viable cells ± SD. The differences between positive control and treated with tested compounds were evaluated by non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test. Statistical significance: p < 0.05. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was used as a solvent; , half maximal inhibitory concentration.
Experimental details of the crystallographic analysis for lactones 5a, 7a, 13a, 12b and 12c.
| 5a | 7a | 13a | 12b | 12c | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Empirical formula | C | C | C | C | C |
| Formula weight | 274.73 | 319.19 | 256.29 | 206.24 | 224.22 |
| Temperature (K) | 293.15 | 293.15 | 100 | 100 | 293.15 |
| Wavelength (Å) | 0.71073 | 0.71073 | 1.54184 | 1.54184 | 0.71073 |
| Crystal system, space group | monoclinic, | monoclinic, | monoclinic, | orthorhombic P b c a ( | orthorhombic P b c a |
| a (Å) | 13.670(3) | 13.9026(9) | 11.4137(2) | 10.1332(2) | 10.042(3) |
| b(Å) | 8.9220(2) | 8.9784(4) | 11.46100(10) | 7.62820(10) | 7.591(2) |
| c(Å) | 11.890(3) | 11.8318(9) | 10.7848(2) | 27.2405(2) | 28.174(3) |
| 111.73(3) | 111.418(8) | 117.359(2) | 90 | 90 | |
| Volume (Å | 1347.1(5) | 1374.89(17) | 1252.982 (4) | 2105.64(5) | 2147.8(9) |
| Z, Calculated density (Mg/m | 4, 1.355 | 4, 1.542 | 4, 0.154 | 8, 0.1831 | 8, 1.387 |
| Absorption coefficient (mm | 0.278 | 2.984 | 0.126 | 0.150 | 0.110 |
| F(000) | 576 | 648 | 544 | 880 | 944 |
| Theta range for data collection ( | 2.935 −28.804 | 2.927 −26.999 | 3.86 −76.29 | 3.24 −75.38 | 3.441 −28.867 |
| Index ranges | −17 ≤ h ≤ 18, −11 ≤ k ≤ 12, −16 ≤ l ≤ 9 | −17≤ h≤ 17, −11 ≤ k ≤ 11, −12 ≤ l ≤ 15 | −14 ≤ h ≤ 14, −14 ≤ k ≤ 14, −12 ≤ l ≤ 13 | −142 ≤ h≤ 10, −9 ≤ k ≤ 9, −32 ≤ l ≤ 33 | −13 ≤ h≤ 13, −8≤ k ≤ 10, −36 ≤ l ≤ 37 |
| Reflections Collected unique observed [I > 2sigma(I)] | 9623 | 9471 | 17416 | 13106 | 14345 |
| 3259 | 2957 | 2623 | 2170 | 2677 | |
| 1811 | 1923 | 2483 | 2017 | 1951 | |
|
| 0.0713 | 0.0959 | 0.0281 | 0.0401 | 0.0501 |
| Completeness to | 25.242 | 25.242 | 76.29 | 75.38 | 25.242 |
| Refinement method | Full-matrix least-squares on | Full-matrix least-squares on | Full-matrix least-squares on | Full-matrix least-squares on | Full-matrix least-squares on |
| Data/restraints/parameters | 3259/0/172 | 2957/0/172 | 2623/0/259 | 2170/0/140 | 2677/0/149 |
| Goodness-of-fit on | 0.883 | 1.436 | 4.030 | 3.16 | 1.052 |
| Final R indices [I > 2sigma(I)] | |||||
| R indices (all data) | |||||
Figure 8The arrangement of 5a in the unit cell box.
Figure 9The arrangement of 7a in the unit cell box.
Figure 10The arrangement of 13a in the unit cell box.
Figure 11The arrangement of 12b in the unit cell box.
Figure 12The arrangement of 12c in the unit cell box.