OBJECTIVE: Growth hormone (GH) nadir (GHnadir) during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is an important tool in diagnosing acromegaly, but data evaluating the need to adjust cut-offs to biological variables utilizing today's assay methods are scarce. We therefore investigated large cohorts of healthy subjects of both sexes to define normal GHnadir concentrations for a modern, sensitive, 22 kD-GH-specific assay. DESIGN: Multicenter study with prospective and retrospective cohorts (525 healthy adults: 405 females and 120 males). METHODS: GH concentrations were measured by the IDS-iSYS immunoassay after oral application of 75 g glucose. RESULTS: GHnadir concentrations (µg/L) were significantly higher in lean and normal weight subjects (group A) compared to overweight and obese subjects (group B); (males (M): A vs B, mean: 0.124 vs 0.065, P = 0.0317; premenopausal females without estradiol-containing OC (OC-EE) (FPRE): A vs B, mean: 0.179 vs 0.092, P < 0.0001; postmenopausal women (FPOST): A vs B, mean: 0.173 vs 0.078, P < 0.0061). Age, glucose metabolism and menstrual cycle had no impact on GHnadir. However, premenopausal females on OC-EE (FPREOC) exhibited significantly higher GHnadir compared to all other groups (all P < 0.0001). BMI had no impact on GHnadir in FPREOC (A vs B, mean: 0.624 vs 0.274, P = 0.1228). CONCLUSIONS: BMI, sex and OC-EE intake are the major determinants for the GHnadir during OGTT in healthy adults. Using a modern sensitive GH assay, GHnadir concentrations in healthy subjects are distinctly lower than cut-offs used in previous guidelines for diagnosis and monitoring of acromegaly.
OBJECTIVE: Growth hormone (GH) nadir (GHnadir) during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is an important tool in diagnosing acromegaly, but data evaluating the need to adjust cut-offs to biological variables utilizing today's assay methods are scarce. We therefore investigated large cohorts of healthy subjects of both sexes to define normal GHnadir concentrations for a modern, sensitive, 22 kD-GH-specific assay. DESIGN: Multicenter study with prospective and retrospective cohorts (525 healthy adults: 405 females and 120 males). METHODS: GH concentrations were measured by the IDS-iSYS immunoassay after oral application of 75 g glucose. RESULTS: GHnadir concentrations (µg/L) were significantly higher in lean and normal weight subjects (group A) compared to overweight and obese subjects (group B); (males (M): A vs B, mean: 0.124 vs 0.065, P = 0.0317; premenopausal females without estradiol-containing OC (OC-EE) (FPRE): A vs B, mean: 0.179 vs 0.092, P < 0.0001; postmenopausal women (FPOST): A vs B, mean: 0.173 vs 0.078, P < 0.0061). Age, glucose metabolism and menstrual cycle had no impact on GHnadir. However, premenopausal females on OC-EE (FPREOC) exhibited significantly higher GHnadir compared to all other groups (all P < 0.0001). BMI had no impact on GHnadir in FPREOC (A vs B, mean: 0.624 vs 0.274, P = 0.1228). CONCLUSIONS: BMI, sex and OC-EE intake are the major determinants for the GHnadir during OGTT in healthy adults. Using a modern sensitive GH assay, GHnadir concentrations in healthy subjects are distinctly lower than cut-offs used in previous guidelines for diagnosis and monitoring of acromegaly.
Authors: Andrea Giustina; Garni Barkhoudarian; Albert Beckers; Anat Ben-Shlomo; Nienke Biermasz; Beverly Biller; Cesar Boguszewski; Marek Bolanowski; Jens Bollerslev; Vivien Bonert; Marcello D Bronstein; Michael Buchfelder; Felipe Casanueva; Philippe Chanson; David Clemmons; Maria Fleseriu; Anna Maria Formenti; Pamela Freda; Monica Gadelha; Eliza Geer; Mark Gurnell; Anthony P Heaney; Ken K Y Ho; Adriana G Ioachimescu; Steven Lamberts; Edward Laws; Marco Losa; Pietro Maffei; Adam Mamelak; Moises Mercado; Mark Molitch; Pietro Mortini; Alberto M Pereira; Stephan Petersenn; Kalmon Post; Manuel Puig-Domingo; Roberto Salvatori; Susan L Samson; Ilan Shimon; Christian Strasburger; Brooke Swearingen; Peter Trainer; Mary L Vance; John Wass; Margaret E Wierman; Kevin C J Yuen; Maria Chiara Zatelli; Shlomo Melmed Journal: Rev Endocr Metab Disord Date: 2020-09-10 Impact factor: 6.514
Authors: Pamela U Freda; Jeffrey N Bruce; Carlos Reyes-Vidal; Simran Singh; Yessica DeLeon; Zhezhen Jin; Alexander G Khandji; Serge Cremers; Kalmon D Post Journal: Pituitary Date: 2020-10-30 Impact factor: 4.107
Authors: Renato Cozzi; Maria R Ambrosio; Roberto Attanasio; Alessandro Bozzao; Laura De Marinis; Ernesto De Menis; Edoardo Guastamacchia; Andrea Lania; Giovanni Lasio; Francesco Logoluso; Pietro Maffei; Maurizio Poggi; Vincenzo Toscano; Michele Zini; Philippe Chanson; Laurence Katznelson Journal: Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets Date: 2020 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Maria Fleseriu; Beverly M K Biller; Pamela U Freda; Monica R Gadelha; Andrea Giustina; Laurence Katznelson; Mark E Molitch; Susan L Samson; Christian J Strasburger; A J van der Lely; Shlomo Melmed Journal: Pituitary Date: 2020-10-20 Impact factor: 4.107
Authors: Jose M Garcia; Beverly M K Biller; Márta Korbonits; Vera Popovic; Anton Luger; Christian J Strasburger; Philippe Chanson; Ronald Swerdloff; Christina Wang; Rosa Rosanna Fleming; Fredric Cohen; Nicola Ammer; Gilbert Mueller; Nicky Kelepouris; Frank Strobl; Vlady Ostrow; Kevin C J Yuen Journal: Endocr Connect Date: 2021-01 Impact factor: 3.335
Authors: C Bona; N Prencipe; A M Berton; F Bioletto; M Parasiliti-Caprino; V Gasco; E Ghigo; S Grottoli Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2022-06-24 Impact factor: 5.467
Authors: Júnia R O L Schweizer; Katharina Schilbach; Michael Haenelt; Alexandre V Giannetti; Mariana F Bizzi; Beatriz S Soares; Eduardo Paulino; Jochen Schopohl; Sylvère Störmann; Antônio Ribeiro-Oliveira; Martin Bidlingmaier Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2021-07-13 Impact factor: 5.958