Charles Sabbagh1, Loréna Masseline2, Gérard Grelpois2, Alexandre Ntouba3, Jeanne Dembinski1, Jean-Marc Regimbeau4. 1. Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Amiens Picardie, Jules Verne University of Picardie, Amiens, France; Simplification of Surgical Patients Care Research Unit, Jules Verne University of Picardie, Amiens, France; Jules Verne University of Picardie, Amiens, France. 2. Simplification of Surgical Patients Care Research Unit, Jules Verne University of Picardie, Amiens, France. 3. Department of Anesthesia, University Hospital of Amiens Picardie, Jules Verne University of Picardie, Amiens, France; Jules Verne University of Picardie, Amiens, France. 4. Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Amiens Picardie, Jules Verne University of Picardie, Amiens, France; Simplification of Surgical Patients Care Research Unit, Jules Verne University of Picardie, Amiens, France; Jules Verne University of Picardie, Amiens, France. Electronic address: regimbeau.jean-marc@chu-amiens.fr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The feasibility of day case surgery (DCS) appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis (UCAA) was evaluated by the prospective AppendAmbu (Feasibility of Outpatient Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis) study (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01839435). The aim of this study was to evaluate the real-life feasibility of DCS for UCAA. STUDY DESIGN: This single-center, retrospective, non-interventional study was conducted after the AppendAmbu study and included UCAA only. The primary end point was DCS success rate (ie length of stay <12 hours) in the intention-to-treat population (all patients with UCAA) and in the per-protocol population (population with UCAA and no preoperative and intraoperative exclusion criteria). The secondary end points were to determine the DCS quality criteria to evaluate and compare the morbidity and mortality of DCS and conventional hospitalization for UCAA (Clavien, Comprehensive Complication Index) and to externally validate the St Antoine criteria for the selection of patients for DCS. RESULTS: From January 2016 to September 2017, two hundred and ninety-six patients underwent operations for acute appendicitis. The proportion of patients with successful DCS management was 27% in the intention-to-treat population and 95% in the per-protocol population. The unplanned consultation rate was 15%, the unplanned hospitalization rate was 4%, and the unplanned reoperation rate was 0%. The postoperative morbidity of patients managed by DCS was not different from that of patients managed in conventional hospitalization. The DCS success rate was 0%, with a St Antoine score of 0, and 80% of patients had a St Antoine score of 5 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Day case surgery constitutes progress in surgery as a result of enhanced recovery programs. It avoids unnecessary prolonged hospitalization.
BACKGROUND: The feasibility of day case surgery (DCS) appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis (UCAA) was evaluated by the prospective AppendAmbu (Feasibility of Outpatient Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis) study (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01839435). The aim of this study was to evaluate the real-life feasibility of DCS for UCAA. STUDY DESIGN: This single-center, retrospective, non-interventional study was conducted after the AppendAmbu study and included UCAA only. The primary end point was DCS success rate (ie length of stay <12 hours) in the intention-to-treat population (all patients with UCAA) and in the per-protocol population (population with UCAA and no preoperative and intraoperative exclusion criteria). The secondary end points were to determine the DCS quality criteria to evaluate and compare the morbidity and mortality of DCS and conventional hospitalization for UCAA (Clavien, Comprehensive Complication Index) and to externally validate the St Antoine criteria for the selection of patients for DCS. RESULTS: From January 2016 to September 2017, two hundred and ninety-six patients underwent operations for acute appendicitis. The proportion of patients with successful DCS management was 27% in the intention-to-treat population and 95% in the per-protocol population. The unplanned consultation rate was 15%, the unplanned hospitalization rate was 4%, and the unplanned reoperation rate was 0%. The postoperative morbidity of patients managed by DCS was not different from that of patients managed in conventional hospitalization. The DCS success rate was 0%, with a St Antoine score of 0, and 80% of patients had a St Antoine score of 5 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Day case surgery constitutes progress in surgery as a result of enhanced recovery programs. It avoids unnecessary prolonged hospitalization.
Authors: Elisabeth M L de Wijkerslooth; Jay M Bakas; Joost van Rosmalen; Anne Loes van den Boom; Bas P L Wijnhoven Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2021-02-11 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Heather C M Pringle; Urszula Donigiewicz; Melissa-Rose Bennett; Eleanor Walker; George E Fowler; Sunil Narang; Susan Ball; Robert M Bethune Journal: BMC Surg Date: 2021-05-12 Impact factor: 2.102