Literature DB >> 31095893

Improving scientific practice in sports-associated drug testing.

Jon Nissen-Meyer1, Tore Skotland2, Bjarne Østerud3, Erik Boye1,2.   

Abstract

Antidoping work is heavily based on scientific analyses of biological material, such as urine and blood. Because of the high stakes both for sports and for the athletes involved it is important that analyses are performed and interpreted in agreement with established scientific standards and professional norms. This is not always the case, as we document here. It is our experience that the antidoping movement does not appear willing to consider that errors can occur and should be corrected. The consequences of the lack of transparency and responsibility are carried by unlucky athletes. Scientific, ethical and legal considerations urge the antidoping movement to reform some of their rules and regulations and to include the possibility that the World Anti-Doping Agency position could, in some cases, be incorrect.
© 2019 Federation of European Biochemical Societies.

Keywords:  EPO; PAGE; WADA laboratories; doping; scientific analyses

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31095893     DOI: 10.1111/febs.14920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEBS J        ISSN: 1742-464X            Impact factor:   5.542


  1 in total

1.  Are doping tests in sports trustworthy?: Athletes suffer from insufficiently defined criteria for doping tests: Athletes suffer from insufficiently defined criteria for doping tests.

Authors:  Jon Nissen-Meyer; Tore Skotland; Erik Boye
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 8.807

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.