Katherine A Gifford1, Susan P Bell1,2, Dandan Liu3, Jacquelyn E Neal3, Maxim Turchan1, Avantika S Shah2,4, Angela L Jefferson1,2. 1. Vanderbilt Memory & Alzheimer's Center, Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. 2. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. 3. Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. 4. Center for Quality Aging, Division of General Internal Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Physical frailty (or loss of physiologic reserve) is associated with cognitive impairment and dementia. Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) may represent early pathologic changes of dementia. The association between these disease markers is unclear. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis. SETTING: Community-based participants from the Vanderbilt Memory & Aging Project. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 306 older adults with normal cognition (NC; n = 174) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI; n = 132). MEASUREMENTS: Frailty was measured using standard methods, and a composite frailty score was calculated. SCD was quantified using the Everyday Cognition Scale (ECog; total score and four domain scores). Objective cognition was assessed with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Proportional odds models, stratified by sex, related the frailty composite to MoCA and total ECog score adjusting for age, education, body mass index, cognitive diagnosis, depressed mood, Framingham Stroke Risk Profile, apolipoprotein E (APOE ε4) carrier status, and height (for gait speed models). Secondary models related individual frailty components to SCD domains and explored associations in NC only. RESULTS: In women, frailty composite was related to MoCA (odds ratio [OR] = .56; P = .04), a finding attenuated in sensitivity analysis (OR = .59; P = .08). Frailty composite related to ECog total (OR = 2.27; P = .02), planning (OR = 2.63; P = .02), and organization scores (OR = 2.39; P = .03). Increasing gait speed related to lower ECog total (OR = .06; P = .003) and memory scores (OR = .03; P < .001). Grip strength related to lower ECog planning score (OR = .91; P = .04). In men, frailty was unrelated to objective and subjective cognition (P values >.07). Findings were consistent in the NC group. CONCLUSION: Frailty component and composite scores are related to SCD before the presence of overt dementia. Results suggest that this association is present before overt cognitive impairment. Results suggest a possible sex difference in the clinical manifestation of frailty, with primary associations noted in women. Further studies should investigate mechanisms linking early changes among frailty, SCD, and cognition. J Am Geriatr Soc, 1-9, 2019. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:1803-1811, 2019.
OBJECTIVES: Physical frailty (or loss of physiologic reserve) is associated with cognitive impairment and dementia. Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) may represent early pathologic changes of dementia. The association between these disease markers is unclear. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis. SETTING: Community-based participants from the Vanderbilt Memory & Aging Project. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 306 older adults with normal cognition (NC; n = 174) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI; n = 132). MEASUREMENTS: Frailty was measured using standard methods, and a composite frailty score was calculated. SCD was quantified using the Everyday Cognition Scale (ECog; total score and four domain scores). Objective cognition was assessed with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Proportional odds models, stratified by sex, related the frailty composite to MoCA and total ECog score adjusting for age, education, body mass index, cognitive diagnosis, depressed mood, Framingham Stroke Risk Profile, apolipoprotein E (APOE ε4) carrier status, and height (for gait speed models). Secondary models related individual frailty components to SCD domains and explored associations in NC only. RESULTS: In women, frailty composite was related to MoCA (odds ratio [OR] = .56; P = .04), a finding attenuated in sensitivity analysis (OR = .59; P = .08). Frailty composite related to ECog total (OR = 2.27; P = .02), planning (OR = 2.63; P = .02), and organization scores (OR = 2.39; P = .03). Increasing gait speed related to lower ECog total (OR = .06; P = .003) and memory scores (OR = .03; P < .001). Grip strength related to lower ECog planning score (OR = .91; P = .04). In men, frailty was unrelated to objective and subjective cognition (P values >.07). Findings were consistent in the NC group. CONCLUSION: Frailty component and composite scores are related to SCD before the presence of overt dementia. Results suggest that this association is present before overt cognitive impairment. Results suggest a possible sex difference in the clinical manifestation of frailty, with primary associations noted in women. Further studies should investigate mechanisms linking early changes among frailty, SCD, and cognition. J Am Geriatr Soc, 1-9, 2019. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:1803-1811, 2019.
Authors: J M Guralnik; L Ferrucci; C F Pieper; S G Leveille; K S Markides; G V Ostir; S Studenski; L F Berkman; R B Wallace Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: M S Yassuda; A Lopes; M Cachioni; D V S Falcao; S S T Batistoni; V V Guimaraes; A L Neri Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Frank Jessen; Rebecca E Amariglio; Martin van Boxtel; Monique Breteler; Mathieu Ceccaldi; Gaël Chételat; Bruno Dubois; Carole Dufouil; Kathryn A Ellis; Wiesje M van der Flier; Lidia Glodzik; Argonde C van Harten; Mony J de Leon; Pauline McHugh; Michelle M Mielke; Jose Luis Molinuevo; Lisa Mosconi; Ricardo S Osorio; Audrey Perrotin; Ronald C Petersen; Laura A Rabin; Lorena Rami; Barry Reisberg; Dorene M Rentz; Perminder S Sachdev; Vincent de la Sayette; Andrew J Saykin; Philip Scheltens; Melanie B Shulman; Melissa J Slavin; Reisa A Sperling; Robert Stewart; Olga Uspenskaya; Bruno Vellas; Pieter Jelle Visser; Michael Wagner Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2014-05-03 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Beth E Snitz; Lisa A Weissfeld; Ann D Cohen; Oscar L Lopez; Robert D Nebes; Howard J Aizenstein; Eric McDade; Julie C Price; Chester A Mathis; William E Klunk Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: M M Cherrier; S Asthana; S Plymate; L Baker; A M Matsumoto; E Peskind; M A Raskind; K Brodkin; W Bremner; A Petrova; S LaTendresse; S Craft Journal: Neurology Date: 2001-07-10 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Rebecca E Amariglio; J Alex Becker; Jeremy Carmasin; Lauren P Wadsworth; Natacha Lorius; Caroline Sullivan; Jacqueline E Maye; Christopher Gidicsin; Lesley C Pepin; Reisa A Sperling; Keith A Johnson; Dorene M Rentz Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2012-08-23 Impact factor: 3.139
Authors: Erin D Bouldin; Christopher A Taylor; Kenneth A Knapp; Christina E Miyawaki; Nicholas R Mercado; Karen G Wooten; Lisa C McGuire Journal: Int Psychogeriatr Date: 2020-09-04 Impact factor: 7.191
Authors: Zvinka Z Zlatar; Wassim Tarraf; Kevin A González; Priscilla M Vásquez; María J Marquine; Richard B Lipton; Linda C Gallo; Tasneem Khambaty; Donglin Zeng; Marston E Youngblood; Mayra L Estrella; Carmen R Isasi; Martha Daviglus; Hector M González Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2021-05-31 Impact factor: 16.655
Authors: AnnaLynn M Williams; Kevin R Krull; Carrie R Howell; Pia Banerjee; Tara M Brinkman; Sue C Kaste; Robyn E Partin; Deokumar Srivastava; Yutaka Yasui; Gregory T Armstrong; Leslie L Robison; Melissa M Hudson; Kirsten K Ness Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2021-07-20 Impact factor: 44.544