Literature DB >> 31095685

Level and source of fat in the diet of gestating beef cows: I. Effects on the prepartum performance of the dam and birth weight of the progeny1.

Federico Añez-Osuna1, Gregory B Penner1, John Campbell2, Michael E R Dugan3, Carolyn J Fitzsimmons3,4, Paul G Jefferson5, Herbert A Lardner1,5, John J McKinnon1.   

Abstract

A 2-yr study was conducted to evaluate the effects of level and source of fat in the diet of gestating beef cows on their prepartum performance and birth weight of progeny. Each year, 75 multiparous (≥3 calving) pregnant Angus cows were stratified by BW (663 ± 21.5 kg) and BCS (2.6 ± 0.12; 1 to 5 scale) and randomly assigned to 1 of 15 outdoor pens. Subsequently, each pen was randomly assigned to 1 of 3 (n = 5) treatments: a low-fat diet (LF; 1.4 ± 0.12% EE) consisting of grass-legume hay, barley straw, and barley grain, or 1 of 2 high-fat diets (HF; 3.3 ± 0.20% EE) that included either a canola seed (CAN) or a flaxseed (FLX) based pelleted feed. Diets were formulated to meet the requirements of pregnant beef cows during the last 2 trimesters of gestation (0.183 ± 4.8 d), adjusted for changes in environmental conditions, and offered such that each pen on average received similar daily amounts of DE (31.2 ± 2.8 Mcal/cow), CP (1.36 ± 0.13 kg/cow), and DM (12.9 ± 1.0 kg/cow). Data were analyzed as a randomized complete block design with contrasts to separate the effects of level (LF vs. HF) and source (CAN vs. FLX) of fat. After 160 d on trial, conceptus corrected-BW (CC-BW) of LF cows (708 kg) and the proportion of overconditioned cows (13.2%) were greater (P ≤ 0.04) than those of HF, with no difference (P ≥ 0.84) between CAN and FLX for CC-BW (697 kg) and proportion of overconditioned cows (3.6% vs. 2.9%). Feeding FLX diet during gestation resulted in cows with a greater (P ≤ 0.01) concentration of conjugated linolenic acid (0.12% vs. 0.05%) and n-3 (0.58% vs. 0.37%) fatty acids, and a tendency (P = 0.09) for conjugated linoleic acid concentration (1.05% vs. 0.88%) to be greater in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SCAT) when compared with cows fed the CAN diet. By the end of gestation, serum NEFA concentration of LF cows (592 µEq/L) was lower (P < 0.01) than that of HF cows, and FLX cows had greater (P < 0.01) serum NEFA concentration than CAN cows (636 vs. 961 µEq/L). Cows receiving the LF diet during gestation gave birth to lighter (P < 0.01) calves compared with those receiving the HF diets (40.2 vs. 42.9 kg), with no difference (P = 0.24) between calves born to CAN (42.4 kg) and FLX (43.3 kg) cows. In conclusion, these results suggest a partitioning of the ME in pregnant beef cows that is dependent on the type of dietary energy, resulting in heavier calves at birth for cows fed high-fat diets. Also, the type of fatty acid in the diet of gestating beef cows affected the fatty acid profile in SCAT and serum NEFA concentration.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  beef cows; energy partitioning; fat level; fat source; gestation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31095685      PMCID: PMC6606498          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skz171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  40 in total

1.  Enzymic determination of D(-)-beta-hydroxybutyric acid and acetoacetic acid in blood.

Authors:  D H WILLIAMSON; J MELLANBY; H A KREBS
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1962-01       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 2.  Maternal nutrition and fetal development.

Authors:  Guoyao Wu; Fuller W Bazer; Timothy A Cudd; Cynthia J Meininger; Thomas E Spencer
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 3.  Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.

Authors:  P J Van Soest; J B Robertson; B A Lewis
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.034

4.  Effects of amount and source of fat on the rates of lipolysis and biohydrogenation of fatty acids in ruminal contents.

Authors:  T M Beam; T C Jenkins; P J Moate; R A Kohn; D L Palmquist
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Effect of extruded full-fat soybeans on conjugated linoleic acid content of intramuscular, intermuscular, and subcutaneous fat in beef steers.

Authors:  M S Madron; D G Peterson; D A Dwyer; B A Corl; L H Baumgard; D H Beermann; D E Bauman
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Effects of dietary unsaturated fatty acids on oocyte quality and follicular development in lactating dairy cows in summer.

Authors:  T R Bilby; J Block; B C do Amaral; O Sa Filho; F T Silvestre; P J Hansen; C R Staples; W W Thatcher
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.034

7.  Effects of feeding beef females supplemental fat during gestation on cold tolerance in newborn calves.

Authors:  M A Lammoglia; R A Bellows; E E Grings; J W Bergman; R E Short; M D MacNeil
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 8.  Implications of dietary fatty acids during pregnancy on placental, fetal and postnatal development--a review.

Authors:  Emilio Herrera
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 9.  Challenges with fats and fatty acid methods.

Authors:  D L Palmquist; T C Jenkins
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Methods for analysis of conjugated linoleic acids and trans-18:1 isomers in dairy fats by using a combination of gas chromatography, silver-ion thin-layer chromatography/gas chromatography, and silver-ion liquid chromatography.

Authors:  Cristina Cruz-Hernandez; Zeyuan Deng; Jianqiang Zhou; Arthur R Hill; Martin P Yurawecz; Pierluigi Delmonte; Magdi M Mossoba; Michael E R Dugan; John K G Kramer
Journal:  J AOAC Int       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.913

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.