Literature DB >> 31095325

Sex-Specific Selection and the Evolution of Between-Sex Genetic Covariance.

Joel W McGlothlin1, Robert M Cox2, Edmund D Brodie3.   

Abstract

Because the sexes share a genome, traits expressed in males are usually genetically correlated with the same traits expressed in females. On short timescales, between-sex genetic correlations (rmf) for shared traits may constrain the evolution of sexual dimorphism by preventing males and females from responding independently to sex-specific selection. However, over longer timescales, rmf may evolve, thereby facilitating the evolution of dimorphism. Although it has been suggested that sexually antagonistic selection may reduce rmf, we lack a general theory for the evolution of rmf and its multivariate analog, the between-sex genetic covariance matrix (B). Here, we derive a simple analytical model for the within-generation change in B due to sex-specific directional selection. We present a single-trait example demonstrating that sex-specific directional selection may either increase or decrease between-sex genetic covariance, depending on the relative strength of selection in each sex and on the current value of rmf. Although sexually antagonistic selection can reduce between-sex covariance, it will only do so when selection is much stronger in one sex than in the other. Counterintuitively, sexually antagonistic selection that is equal in strength in the 2 sexes will maintain positive between-sex covariance. Selection acting in the same direction on both sexes is predicted to reduce between-sex covariance in many cases. We illustrate our model numerically using empirical measures of sex-specific selection and between-sex genetic covariance from 2 populations of sexually dimorphic brown anole lizards (Anolis sagrei) and discuss its importance for understanding the resolution of intralocus sexual conflict. © The American Genetic Association 2019. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  constraint; genetic correlation; intralocus sexual conflict; sexual dimorphism; sexual selection

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31095325     DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esz031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hered        ISSN: 0022-1503            Impact factor:   2.645


  3 in total

1.  Quantifying maladaptation during the evolution of sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Genevieve Matthews; Sandra Hangartner; David G Chapple; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  A sex-specific evolutionary interaction between ADCY9 and CETP.

Authors:  Isabel Gamache; Marc-André Legault; Jean-Christophe Grenier; Rocio Sanchez; Eric Rhéaume; Samira Asgari; Amina Barhdadi; Yassamin Feroz Zada; Holly Trochet; Yang Luo; Leonid Lecca; Megan Murray; Soumya Raychaudhuri; Jean-Claude Tardif; Marie-Pierre Dubé; Julie Hussin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  The Evolution of Derived Monomorphism From Sexual Dimorphism: A Case Study on Salamanders.

Authors:  Nancy L Staub
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2020-12-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.