Literature DB >> 31095316

Effects of dietary exogenous fibrolytic enzymes on ruminal fermentation characteristics of beef steers fed high- and low-quality growing diets1.

Lucas B Kondratovich1, Jhones O Sarturi1, Carly A Hoffmann1, Michael A Ballou1, Sara J Trojan1, Pedro R B Campanili1.   

Abstract

The effects of dietary pretreatment with fibrolytic enzyme-based cocktail were evaluated in 2 studies: (1) in vitro true digestibility; and (2) intake, digestibility, feeding behavior, and ruminal fermentation of beef steers fed growing diets. For the in vitro assessment, the ruminal inoculum was collected from 2 steers (BW = 543 ± 45 kg; 4-h after feeding; growing diets) and enzymes included or not (Trichoderma reesei fermentation extract; 0.75 µL/g of substrate DM). Within in vitro batches (n = 4), 12 substrates were incubated and in vitro true nutrient digestibility was evaluated. For study 2, 5 ruminally cannulated beef steers (BW = 520 ± 30 kg) were used in a 5 × 4 unbalanced Latin square using a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments: (a) diet quality (high = HQ; and low = LQ) and (b) enzyme inclusion (0 or 0.75 mL/kg of diet DM). Steers were fed ad libitum during four 21-d periods consisting of 14-d of adaptation and 7-d of collections. An enzyme × substrate was observed (P < 0.01), in which DM, OM, and NDF disappearance of sorghum grain increased with enzymes addition. Addition of enzymes increased (P < 0.01) ADF digestibility for all substrates. No diet quality × enzyme (P ≥ 0.18) was observed for intake variables in study 2. Enzyme-fed steers increased (P ≤ 0.05) intake of DM, digestible DM, NDF, and ADF compared with steers not fed fibrolytic enzymes. Addition of enzyme did not affect (P ≥ 0.28) apparent total tract digestibility of beef steers. Steers fed HQ diets consumed more (P ≤ 0.04) DM, digestible DM and OM, and less (P ≤ 0.03) total and digestible fiber than steers fed LQ diets. Ruminal pH average decreased (P = 0.01) for steers fed HQ or enzyme-fed diets compared with other treatments. A tendency (P = 0.06) toward improved total VFA was observed on enzyme-fed steers with HQ diets, but not for LQ diets. The molar proportion of ruminal propionate increased (P = 0.01) when steers were fed enzyme. Steers fed HQ diets had greater (P < 0.01) propionate and valerate molar proportions, lower (P < 0.01) acetate and acetate:propionate ratio than steers fed LQ diets. In vitro methane and total gas production were not affected (P ≥ 0.50) by dietary treatments. Fibrolytic enzymes positively affected digestion of multiple roughage sources commonly fed to cattle and might have additional benefit when used on unprocessed sorghum grain. Fibrolytic enzymes in beef cattle growing diets stimulated intake and generated positive impacts on ruminal fermentation.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cellulase; digestibility; enzyme; feeding behavior; growing diet

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31095316      PMCID: PMC6606506          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skz165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  18 in total

1.  Studies on ruminant saliva. 1. The composition and output of sheep's saliva.

Authors:  E I McDougall
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1948       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  Nutritional recommendations of feedlot consulting nutritionists: the 2007 Texas Tech University survey.

Authors:  J T Vasconcelos; M L Galyean
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2007-06-25       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Using a fibrolytic enzyme in barley-based diets containing wheat dried distillers grains with solubles: ruminal fermentation, digestibility, and growth performance of feedlot steers.

Authors:  Z X He; M L He; N D Walker; T A McAllister; W Z Yang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 4.  Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.

Authors:  P J Van Soest; J B Robertson; B A Lewis
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  A fibrolytic enzyme additive for lactating Holstein cow diets: ruminal fermentation, rumen microbial populations, and enteric methane emissions.

Authors:  Y-H Chung; M Zhou; L Holtshausen; T W Alexander; T A McAllister; L L Guan; M Oba; K A Beauchemin
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  A comparison of methods of adding fibrolytic enzymes to lactating cow diets.

Authors:  W Z Yang; K A Beauchemin; L M Rode
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.034

7.  Fibrolytic enzyme supplements for dairy cows in early lactation.

Authors:  L M Rode; W Z Yang; K A Beauchemin
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.034

8.  Effect of direct-fed fibrolytic enzymes on the lactational performance of dairy cows.

Authors:  G E Lewis; W K Sanchez; C W Hunt; M A Guy; G T Pritchard; B I Swanson; R J Treacher
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.034

9.  Improved milk production efficiency in early lactation dairy cattle with dietary addition of a developmental fibrolytic enzyme additive.

Authors:  L Holtshausen; Y-H Chung; H Gerardo-Cuervo; M Oba; K A Beauchemin
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.034

10.  Effect of method of applying fibrolytic enzymes or ammonia to Bermudagrass hay on feed intake, digestion, and growth of beef steers.

Authors:  N A Krueger; A T Adesogan; C R Staples; W K Krueger; S C Kim; R C Littell; L E Sollenberger
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 3.159

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparing the effectiveness of different roughage sources in Brazilian cattle feed.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.159

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.