Literature DB >> 31095167

[Implementation of a clinical guideline for detection of gestational diabetes in primary care].

Rafael Tuesca Molina1, Tania Acosta Vergara1, Brayan Domínguez Lozano2, Carlos Ricaurte3, Humberto Mendoza Charris4, Karen Flórez-Lozano5, Víctor Florez-García1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes (GD) impacts maternal and fetal morbidity. In 2012, the World Diabetes Foundation provided financing project in Barranquilla (Colombia), aimed to implement a clinical guide for the diagnosis and treatment of this condition. AIM: To estimate the adherence of the guide in primary care centers.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A Cross-sectional study of pregnant women suspected of having gestational diabetes. Pregnant women were classified according to the week of admission to the prenatal control program: < week 24 or later. Women with a fasting blood glucose over 92 mg/dL and under 126 mg/dL or with some positive result to the oral glucose tolerance test were included.
RESULTS: Nine percent (1,887 women) of 21,699 registries of pregnant women, were at risk for gestational diabetes. Of these, 1,880 registries with complete data were analyzed. Sixty nine entered the program at less than 24 weeks of pregnancy and 71% had had a fasting blood glucose measured in the first control. In 69.2% of these women, criteria for gestational diabetes was met. A glucose tolerance test was suggested to women with a blood glucose below 92 mg/dl. Among 72% of the latter, the glucose tolerance test met the criteria for gestational diabetes. Among the 498 women who entered the program after 24 weeks of gestation, 68% met the criteria for gestational diabetes with the fasting blood glucose levels. In 90 women, a glucose tolerance test was performed and 80% met the criteria for gestational diabetes.
CONCLUSIONS: An adequate adherence to guidelines favors the detection of pregnant women with gestational diabetes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31095167     DOI: 10.4067/s0034-98872019000200190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Med Chil        ISSN: 0034-9887            Impact factor:   0.553


  1 in total

1.  Evolution of the quality of prenatal care in the primary network of Brazil from 2012 to 2018: What can (and should) improve?

Authors:  Elaine Tomasi; Thales Moura de Assis; Paulo Guilherme Muller; Denise Silva da Silveira; Rosália Garcia Neves; Everton Fantinel; Elaine Thumé; Luiz Augusto Facchini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.